User talk:Jgreen262/sandbox

Ryan Pan
 * perhaps think about adding to the history section, what veterinary pharmicists do currently and what they use to refer to when prescribing medications to animals
 * I'm a little confused on who actually does the job of compounding... is it the vet doing it or a pharmacist after the fact, also a little confused on the education, like do you get your degree in pharmacy then gravitate to the vetirinary practice or are you a vet and then become in tune with medications and start working on that side of thigns
 * really like all of your sections and think they are all very relevant
 * i think you can add a bunch more on the challenges portion, maybe extend each of the bullet points that you have, giving examples for each, also int eh challenges section, you can delve into why there is a need for a development of this subject and where further research should aim towards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanpan007 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hanalei's Peer Review
A lead section that is easy to understand

-The lead in section is relatively clear, though I think some of the information about compounding medication, and the reasons for compounding that you included (for taste, appearance, changes in dosages, etc.) might be too specific to be included in the introduction. Might be best to include in later content so that the introduction can be condensed to the general info about veterinary pharmacy. -In the first sentence, the inclusion of veterinary pharmacy "is still an emerging field of pharmacy practice" makes it a bit confusing. Possibly eliminate this additional info so that the definition of veterinary pharmacy is more clear. Good for the first sentence to be concise and you can add the extra bit about it being a constantly emerging field later on.

In the history section, it was a bit confusing for me to figure out how compounding medication fits in with the significance of veterinary pharmacy and the role of pharmacists. Possibly divide the 1 large paragraph into 2 to more effectively organize information to make it more clear to the reader how things relate.

In the education section, good info! Include information as to what is phORCAS and APPEs because you mention these programs without explaining what they are. Also might be good to categorize the specific educational programs like University of Florida Pharmacy Program and include others. Also minor edit but you spelled "Purdue" wrong. Overall good information!

Would it be better to change "Practice Sites" to "Practice Settings"? Maybe it's just me but I think more of "settings" when comparing clinical vs. community rather than sites.

"in practice" in "Challenges in Practice" category can probably be eliminated?

A clear structure -Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Overall clear structure! The organization going from general history to more specific categories of education, practice sites, and challenges that come along with this emerging field is good. You can definitely add more information in the subcategories, maybe add more research stats, ex. comparing and detailing effectiveness of veterinary pharmacy in clinical vs community settings and going more in detail with the specific education programs, or lack thereof.

Balanced coverage -Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Yes!

Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? No, everything seems relevant.

-Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? -No. Neutral content

-Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article?

Reliable sources -Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? -Some reliable sources, coming from journals, etc. But there are also some more casual sources like the interviews, which may be argued as debatable neutrality. Probably best to find more journal articles with research carried out.

Overall The intro defines veterinary pharmacy and the impact of pharmacists on this emerging field, A bit confusing at first as to what information is most important so I think it's best if you condense what you include in intro and place the secondary relevant information later. Good chronology of categories. All categories can include more information (obviously totally expected since these are our rough rough drafts haha). Overall I think you're off to a great start. Organization of page provides a good backbone as to what you provide info on, just add more sources too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanalei1212 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Bon Jae Peer Review
Lead

- Lead paragraph was well-written

-Introduces topic clearly

History

- what does "compounding" mean? Can you give a brief explanation of what that means in this section?

-what kind of roles do veterinary pharmacists play?

Education

- What is NAPLEX and what does it do?

- Is there any progress being made for more veterinary pharmacy education?

Overall, very good article and everything else I think is very good and well-written — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koo.b (talk • contribs) 18:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Really nice job on this draft, Jenna. There are some places where it gets a bit wordy (e.g. "The first mention of veterinary pharmacy may date back around 60 years to when literature was published synthesizing veterinary medicine and antibiotic usage") so in those instances try to scale back so each sentence focuses on one idea and then includes a citation (if appropriate). Also, instead of saying "may date back around 60 years" just give a date so it is clear to the reader. Can you be a bit more direct in your lead section, including a clear what/how/why (what is veterinary pharmacy, how does it differ from traditional pharm, and why is it needed). Amyc29 (talk) 03:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Assignments that were in my user page
Veterinary Pharmacy - *GENERAL* Article Outline[edit] Lead - intro General definition Purpose Relation to pharmacy Little bit about compounding Implications for the future History When, how, and why did it start to emerge? Education/Continuing education Residency? Elective courses? Practice experiences? Practice sites Compounding pharmacies Veterinary hospitals? Challenges

Article Evaluation - Collaborative Practice Agreement[edit]

The Wikipedia article "Collaborative Practice Agreement," provides a successful and reliable summary of what a CPA is, how it works, and its implications on pharmacy. The article stays extremely focused on the topic, as each subsequent paragraph relates back to Collaborative Practice Agreements. The article is neutral in the fact that the author(s) do(es) not share a personal opinion, but it does provide brief examples of both criticism and praise for the agreements. Though both views are illustrated in the article, I think that because this is such a pressing topic in the pharmacy community, the article could benefit from slightly more substantial sections on different perspectives from different healthcare professionals. It is apparent that the opinions of physicians and pharmacists should be addressed in the article, but I believe it would really benefit the article to include information on opinions of perhaps nurses or physicians' assistants as well, in addition to expanding on the existing paragraph on perspectives. The majority of the facts included in the article are referenced properly, but it must be known that many of the references come from pharmacy websites or articles, leading one to question if they might be biased in the favor of pharmacists. I don't believe however, that this really raises a question of reliability because the topic is extremely pharmacy-related. The article is very up to date, but it is missing information on each state's individual regulations, as shown in a large chart included in the article. Overall, the article appears to supply a substantial amount of information important to the understanding of a Collaborative Practice Agreement. While there may be room for expansion for perspectives or missing information, it is a part of multiple projects and appears to have relatively minimal problems raised in the Talk Page, leading to my conclusion that it is successful and reliable article.