User talk:Jgrilo3/sandbox

Peer Edit!
Lead Section: Gives a very good overview of the topic. I like the flow of definition to formation to location and then an example. The '--' is kind of a confusing convention, I would just use a common. Each sentence is a good introduction to the specific sections: nothing is redundant, just built upon. I might add a sentence about where geographically the flared slope is found to add a little more overview to the topic.

Organization: The article has a clear structure that makes sense and flows well. The order is appropriate and follows the flow of the lead section. The sections are well titled and make the topic clear.

Content/coverage: I think the coverage of formation could increase. Since Wave Rock is only an example, and only mentioned briefly in the lead section, I would consider it less important. I don't think this is super critical, but you could improve this criteria by adding a few more things to the formation and balance the article better. Other than that, the content itself is all relevant and informational.

Neutrality: The article takes a neutral stance. There is no persuasion or opinions included.

Sources: The sources seem balanced between the 2 sources she provided. Everything is cited. I'm unsure if you are supposed to get more sources on your own to add to this. This would be the only way to change this section. If you don't need to find more sources, the citations do not need to be changed at all.

Overall, there are only a few suggested edits, and it will be ready to be published. Good job! KatieHuda (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)