User talk:Jgunnsm2

June 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frank Lampard, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to David Easter. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Jgunnsm2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page David Easter has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. 220  of  Borg 03:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220  of  Borg 03:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

David Easter
Your comment and my reply copied from Ponyos talkpage, in case you don't get to see it there. 220  of  Borg 03:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey Ponyo I personally knew David Easter so I dont need to cite a source when I was there! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgunnsm2 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually you do still have to provide a source, especially if reverted or challenged about an edit (which has happened 3 times now), and especially if it is a biography of a living person (WP:BLP). 'Personal knowledge' is not a reliable source (WP:RS). If you have a source for him having lived in Claygate, fine, but being "a model neighbour knocking on doors to let them know they had left their car headlights on." is what we call unencyclopaedic information. 220  of  Borg 03:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)