User talk:Jheiv

Suggestions on the chapter article.
I asked User:NYCRuss for suggestions on good list of chapter articles, his advice is at User talk:NYCRuss.Naraht (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much -- this stuff is very helpful -- I'm beginning to see a lot of room for improvement when I didn't think there could possibly be any more. jheiv  talk  contribs 13:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Mcmillenjudge (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

AFD
Bravo for your defense, let me know how I can help.Naraht (talk) 02:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, its a shame we can't spend this time being productive -- and sorry for unknowingly involving one of the articles you've spent some time on -- but I'm pretty sure we're safe (at at least for the time being). jheiv  talk  contribs 07:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * NP.Naraht (talk) 12:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Amateur_Radio_Emergency_Service
I've replied to your comment on the discussion page.
 * I can appreciate that, maybe there a compromise is possible? jheiv  talk  contribs 01:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Well thanks for another viewpoint on the talk page there. I didn't anticipate this level of debate, but here we are. Dawnseeker2000   02:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm finding it difficult to digest the fact that this new user is against adding a link to the D-STAR/D-RATS item. It baffles me. Anyhow, the article could very well use a section on technology used. Some of the communication tools that ARES uses are standard amateur radio items. But as the article stands it doesn't even mention packet. Developing some content that speaks of digital technologies would be good and I would welcome you to help out there. Thanks. Dawnseeker2000  17:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Mootros (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

A very minor point
I appreciate the mention at Talk:Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy, but Hipocrite deserves the credit for the suggestion.-- SPhilbrick  T  15:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

It was me...
... who requested an account on the ACC account creation interface. Hope this helps :-)  jheiv  talk  contribs 20:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Fun  Pika  20:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Ibc111
I noticed your warning at User talk:Ibc111 (I have worried about the video links that user persistently adds without discussion). In case you missed it, that user has tried to post a message on your talk page, but it ended up in a subpage: User talk:Jheiv/Pages (I assume you won't see a "new messages" indication for that). Johnuniq (talk) 00:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I did miss it -- thanks for the note! jheiv  talk  contribs 01:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Moved note from User:Ibc111
Dear Jheiv: Thanks for telling me the rule. I did read them but unclear how to apply to my case. Your points are more specific. It takes experience. First, why am I interested in interactive network simulation? I have trouble to learn protocols in the past and wish to use simulation and visualization to get to the key points first, then read complete and accurate information provided by traditional materials. Now I a tool to do so. I want to share. Here are some questions that I'd like to seek for your help: I appreciate any help from long time Wikipedian like you. Thanks -ib
 * 1) Will Wikipdia find a way to let users contribute content presented in different forms like interactive simulation? Is there any experiment going on?
 * 2) I have no intention to add url in article to be index by Google. (I thought it flows better.  Readers can "see" a demo while reading accurate text.) Is placing url in External links acceptable?
 * 3) In External links of "Sliding Window Protocol," I see two demos (Flsah and Shockwave.) I added a Flash based simulation below these two demos. I thought it will be OK. But it was removed. I do not understand why. (If you play this simulaation, it shows how to relate window parameter values changes to window's sliding actions.)
 * 4) I intend to share. i can create a web site such as abc.org and place url pointing to abc.org. Is this acceptable?

Moved from User talk:jheiv/Pages. jheiv talk  contribs 01:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Hi ib,

First, I want to say that my warning on your talk page was as a result of this edit, which, as far as I can tell from your contributions, looks like the only edit you have made to the Sliding Window Protocol page -- please correct me if I'm wrong. That edit seemed like an editing test or vandalism, and I quickly noted a few other warnings about policy problems with your edits, so I went with the level 3 warning. Please don't take offense to the warning -- many users without the interest in improving articles come and edit pages maliciously and it's extremely difficult to tell the malicious from the well-intentioned. That being said however, it seems as if you have good intentions and, although I am by no means an expert, but I'll do my best to answer these questions and help you. I'll answer each question separately.

(Quick note, I link to a lot of policy / articles within my response -- please consider taking the time to read all of them, especially the policy ones.)

Lastly, I'll point you to a few more places that might be of interest to you: WP:WELCOME, WP:HELP, WP:POLICY.
 * 1) Will Wikipdia find a way to let users contribute content presented in different forms like interactive simulation? Is there any experiment going on?
 * I'm not aware of any experiment going on that will allow users to experience interactive simulations. However, if you are looking for "richer" media, many Wikipedia articles feature things that are more dynamic than plain text.  For example, the article on Dijkstra's algorithm features an animated gif that shows the progression of the algorithm as does the article on Breadth-first search.  These are especially helpful in my opinion and make use of some of the advantages a digital encyclopedia enjoy.
 * 1) I have no intention to add url in article to be index by Google. (I thought it flows better.  Readers can "see" a demo while reading accurate text.) Is placing url in External links acceptable?
 * There exists some pretty extensive policy documentation on external links, here -- I suggest you read that (a few times, it can be confusing) and if you have specific questions about whether a certain external link is appropriate for an article, start a discussion on the external links noticeboard, a forum where many experienced Wikipedians offer their input about the acceptability of a given link in the hope of finding consensus.
 * 1) In External links of "Sliding Window Protocol," I see two demos (Flsah and Shockwave.) I added a Flash based simulation below these two demos. I thought it will be OK. But it was removed. I do not understand why. (If you play this simulaation, it shows how to relate window parameter values changes to window's sliding actions.)
 * I can't find your edit (it must be under an IP rather than your username) so I can't really help you with those specifics. But like I said, make sure that any external link you wish to add meets the criteria at WP:EL before you add it.  If you are certain it does, but it is removed then you have a few options.
 * Start up a dialog with the editor who removed it, and see why they object.
 * Start up a discussion on the article's talk page about the link and whether it should be included. If you do this, it's nice to notify the editor who removed it that you have started a discussion on the article's talk page and hope they'll be able to add their input.
 * Start up a discussion on the external links noticeboard (link above) and see what their opinion is.
 * An important tenant of Wikipedia policy is to be bold but to always seek consensus, especially if the edit is contentious.
 * 1) I intend to share. i can create a web site such as abc.org and place url pointing to abc.org. Is this acceptable?
 * I think my earlier answers probably covered this, but in summation, it depends on the context, on the article you wish to insert a link into, the value of the external link you wish to add, whether the same material can be incorporated into the article itself (without requiring an external link) as well as many other factors. If you have specifics, I'd suggest starting a thread on the article talk page.  I may already be following the page, but once you start a discussion on the talk page, feel free to come back here and ask for my input.

I want to thank you for your questions and for your interest in improving the Encyclopedia -- I hope I've helped a little bit and please let me know if I can help with anything else. jheiv talk  contribs 01:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Your Request to join the WP:ACC mailing list
Hi there,

I can see your request from a couple of days back to join the mailing list. However, please follow all the instructions at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/accounts-enwiki-l#Subscribing - and send a confirmation email using the Special:Emailuser function, by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Emailuser/Accounts-enwiki-l&wpSubject=Accounts-enwiki-l%20Identification&wpText=I%20would%20like%20to%20subscribe%20to%20the%20Accounts-enwiki-l%20mailing%20list,%20and%20am%20a%20trusted%20user%20on%20the%20English%20Wikipedia.%20I%20have%20applied%20on%20the%20main%20page,%20and%20am%20sending%20this%20email%20to%20identify%20my%20username. clicking here].

I, or another moderator will then approve your request.

Hope this helps,

The Helpful  One  22:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, I actually did already but didn't hear back -- the timestamp was: Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:45 PM. Should I do it again?  Thanks,   jheiv  talk  contribs 23:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, looking through past my emails I can see that you actually did send the email quite a while back, so I have approved your request to join the mailing list. You may also wish to join the IRC channel, #wikipedia-en-accounts, on the Freenode IRC network if you haven't already. Hope this helps, The  Helpful  One  10:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Sean Bielat
Look I am not going to dispute the Bielat page anymore. The article will change after the election next month. If Bielat doesn't win he probably will no longer have any claim to notability anyway and the article will most likely be AFDed, but we'll wait for the election results. However if you think that stating that "However, many note Scott Brown's upset in Massachusetts' 2010 special election as cause for some concern for incumbent Congressman Frank", when Brown has not even endorsed Bielat and has nothing to do with Frank, is not POV while pointing out that Massachusetts, whose entire Congressional delegation is Democratic, is "overwhelmingly" Democratic, is POV then I do not know what to tell you. You don't seem to have any problem with the adjective "self-made" (which I inserted by the way), so your instincts seem to be somewhat skewed. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I agree it is someone's POV, but it's clearly cited as to whose POV it is -- in fact, I think keeping that makes the article more NPOV in that it adds balance. I still don't understand your Brown argument, however. I read the article like this: its clear the odds are stacked against him (Democratic leaning state), but there is some hope (Scott Brown's upset). Without that, it seems like a futile (although many may argue its futile nonetheless) effort.
 * I didn't notice self-made, you are right that many of the changes you made I didn't object to -- only the ones that were unsourced and introduced POV.
 * Lastly, I agree with you that the article will probably be much less notable if he loses the election -- and I, too, suspect it will fail notability. jheiv  talk  contribs 19:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Just readded a few missing words that make my last message a bit more comprehensible. Just in case there is any misunderstanding -- I am not a supporter of Barney Frank! I don't like one-party states, red or blue. Let's see what happens on November 2. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

"Prestigious"
I am removing this word from the lead again, in direct compliance with WP:PEACOCK. Other issues may be subject to consensus, but this issue is directly addressed by Wikipedia policy. If you revert it again, you will be blocked. —Eustress talk 14:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you are a bit confused on the policy. The word prestigious isn't being used to assert notability of the subject of the article -- that is, Penn State -- but rather to help the reader understand the satellite campus system and how the campuses fit together.  Further, as use of the word is now sourced from the Executive Director of admissions of the university, I plan on replacing it if it is erroneously (imho) removed.  If that results in a block, then we'll take that up on the Administrator's noticeboard I suppose.  jheiv  talk  contribs 14:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay... I think I see what you're getting at with the word. Let's put quotes around it so it is clear. —Eustress talk 14:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Just one problem... where is any mention of this campus being the most prestigous in the source? —Eustress talk 14:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats odd, because I searched for prestigious -- anyway, would competitive suffice given that sourcing? I expect that is all the sentence was suppose to convey.  jheiv  talk  contribs 14:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, won't suffice. If you can find a reliable source saying it is the "flagship" campus (much more neutrally worded than "prestigious"), that would be ideal; but any such sentiment should remain off until something can be found. —Eustress talk 14:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * My suggestion is that we remove prestigious and replace it with what was cited, competitive. What are your thoughts on that?  jheiv  talk  contribs 14:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, this page from the PSU law school cites UP as the "flagship" campus. jheiv  talk  contribs 14:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The Law School won't serve as a reliable source (it's not independent)... I'm okay with what is cited: "most competitive campus". —Eustress talk 14:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and make that change.  (You beat me to it) -- I'll also try to find a better source for flagship, although, I'm not sure who would better be able to identify the flagship of a school system other than the school itself (it seems to me it follows the same logic as, if a company press release or earnings report would not be sufficient sourcing for the name of the CEO, what is?).  Thanks.  jheiv  talk  contribs 14:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Moving pages
Hi Jheiv. Next time you move a page to make way for a dab page (as you did with Spider Webb), please remember to update the existing links to the page. I've fixed the links for Spider Webb. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 05:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I read that notice, and clicked "What links here" but I must have been on the wrong page when I did it, because it came up with nothing and I just moved on. Sorry!  jheiv  talk  contribs 05:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. DH85868993 (talk) 00:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Tussey Mountain
Why do you remove my edits as vandalism? PSOC Ski Patrol is an organization pertinent to Tussey Mountain. We are employed there and have been around longer than the resort itself. There is no copyright violation because I have permission to use the content from the website cited as a copyright violation by you. There is also no reason for this content to be considered vandalism. Yakiyos (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the edits for a number of reasons. First off, just because you have permission, doesn't mean you can add it to Wikipedia.  See the policy at Donating Copyrighted Material.  Second, much of the information is not appropriate for the article and goes unnecessary depth about what I can only assume is you and your friends.  See the policies at WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:COI, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:NOTABILITY.  Wikipedia is not a place for you to mirror information that is already on the web.  It is an encyclopedia, and names of random staff members, etc do not belong.  jheiv  talk  contribs 22:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In FnaticMSI, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages GSL, IEM and MLG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Paterno changes
Hi Jheiv - you had made some suggestions to an edit request I made. I made the changes per your recs,  but nothing has been updated. Can u let me know? Thanks.--AVR2012 (talk) 06:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:JohnSurma.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JohnSurma.jpg, which you've sourced to (Flickr Image is CC BY-NC 2.0). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 18:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. When you recently edited Sean Plott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Host and Commentator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kappa-sigma-endowment-fund-logo-reduced.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Kappa-sigma-endowment-fund-logo-reduced.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Boston Wiknic
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC).

Richard Hatch (Survivor contestant)
Hi. You put a tag on the Personal Life section which refers to a discussion on the article's Talk page, but you didn't begin a discussion on the Talk page. 69.62.243.48 (talk) 04:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean Bielat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Bielat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sean Bielat (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Day9tv Logo March 2012.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Day9tv Logo March 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

IEEE technical societies
If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh  18:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member

Nomination of Journal of Forensic Accounting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Forensic Accounting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Journal of Forensic Accounting & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Proposed deletion of List of Fnatic achievements


The article List of Fnatic achievements has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources are cited to demonstrate that this 'list of achievements' meets Wikipedia notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NoAgendaPodcastLogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NoAgendaPodcastLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ks-agc-logo-reduced.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Ks-agc-logo-reduced.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Jheiv! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  22:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Northeastern University student organizations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Northeastern University student organizations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Northeastern University student organizations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Wozal (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)