User talk:Jhenderson777/Archive

crystal ballish reception of shrek forever after
The reason I blanked that section, is the way it is currently worded. "The reception so far" is a sort of crystal ballish way of predicting the performance of the movie, and you are basically doing original research of the end result of the RT score. riffic (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Spider-Man 4 redirects
Hi. Just wondering, if you're going to update one redirect, why not nail the others? I am uncertain if a bot will get to them, that's why I ask you. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Just have a ganders at what relates to Spider-Man 4. That's all. It makes sense to get to the other redirects too, doesn't it? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Soliciting your input
Hi. There's an attempt to bring the History of Spider-Man article, which needs enormous work, up to encyclopedic standards. You were among the editors in the deletion discussion, and it'd be good to get your input on, and edits to, the work-in-progress at User:Spidey104/Fictional history of Spider-Man sandbox. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

List of fictional archenemies
I suppose someone (me/you) may as well start quality referencing the list, otherwise unsourced "put your favourite archenemy on WP" will never stop. I'm almost regretting putting the list back up xD

P.S. Because of your cursive breaking the layout, wikEd no longer works. — Hellknowz ▎talk 12:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * RE: Yeah, I did notice it was on purpose, just thought of pointing out about wikEd. — Hellknowz ▎talk 19:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Sandbox
Relax, it wasn't an accusation. A lot of people do it all the time; the edit summary's just a public reminder to everybody who sees it, not a lecture to you. Bearcat (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

List of fictional archenemies Spongebob
Hey, could you take a look at two references for Spongebob and verify them please? I cannot access them, as the site keeps redirecting me to the main page. I have tagged the two relevant ones with. Cheers! — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I see. I can not access them, it just redirects me away. If they actually do say that, no problem. Thanks! — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Fictional history of Spider-Man
Following three attempts at having this page deleted, a number of editors collaborated on bringing this multiply-tagged article up to policy and guideline standards of Manual of Style (writing about fiction). Comments were solicited at Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man since May 26, and a final draft, created over a month of editorial input, was completed and put up for final comment at Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man on June 25. On June 30, this consensus version, which confirms to Manual of Style (writing about fiction), will replace the current page Fictional history of Spider-Man. As you have contributed to that page, we wanted to alert you to the opportunity for final comments. Thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Captain America: The First Avenger
Just so you know, I nominated us for a DYK over at Template talk:Did you know. Keep your fingers crossed! --TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * And I just want to say how nice it is to work with both you and TriiipleThreat on this article. I so appreciate being able to collaborate with editors as civil and as editorially careful as yourselves. Believe me, that's not universal on Wikipedia! --Tenebrae (talk) 02:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Captain America: The First Avenger
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Syndrome.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Syndrome.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Incrediboy.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Incrediboy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Fictional history of Green Goblin
Sure, why not? That's good initiative, and when you think about it, it makes sense to get the model established in a related area with editors who know the characters and have worked together before. It's nice of you to offer to start the sandbox, and I'd be more than happy to help. At least we know I've got the reference books! --Tenebrae (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Just saw the page. Holy crap! Hope you're reading for a spirited deletion discussion when we finish in about a month or so! I'll start in a couple of days, and post a notice on the Notice Board then. Do feel free to take out chunks in the meantime! --Tenebrae (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Complete agreement. If we can merge Spider-Man's history, then we can merge a supporting character's! And I'm about WIki'd out as well. See you in a day or two.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Swamped with work. I've only jumped in on Wiki articles I've run across during work, but I made a promise and it's only just a delay. I'll be in there tonight. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Films considered the greatest ever
Hi. Why isn't IMDb reliable? The top 50 lists are picked by regular voters, who aren't publicly or privately known in order to protect from fixed voting, and don't you think people who aren't professionals deserve some say? C'mon. :)

And why doesn't Rotten Tomatoes matter? The critics are professionals, so their opinions combined serve a legitimate purpose for lists on that site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EclecticEnnui (talk • contribs) 04:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Consensus discussion on source reliability/notability
Hi. I've started a consensus discussion here. Would you please participate? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters
There was already a prior consensus at FLC not to include certain characters, see ; you can't overturn that just because you happen to disagree. If you think these characters "never should have been removed", the appropriate thing to do is start a discussion at the talk page.

Also, it's not usually the case in WP television articles that there is "no limit" on how many characters can be listed. These articles have inclusion criteria just like all other articles do. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 01:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * As I already said, it's on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters/archive1. If you want more information you should ask User talk:Haha169, the editor who was involved in that review. I did not participate in it and I'm not the one who "doesn't want" those characters, I'm just enforcing what I have been told was a prior consensus. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 00:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
I didnt mean to make you feel guilty. I know you are a careful editor and we have a small working history together so I thought good faith went without saying.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Template: X-Men
Hello, we've talked before, just with a slightly different IP address (i went away on vacation and came back to a new one). I came across your discussion with J Greb and wanted to let you know that I added in some of my own feedback in his talk page and thought you would like to see it. I also came because I saw you were wondering how certain villains are on the list if they've been on teams, etc. Well as the one note that comes up when you edit, we're trying to keep the singular villains list to ones who, while they may have been on teams, they need to have done enough as a villain on their own to get on there. For example, I'll take the Hellfire Club. Note that Selene is on there, because she's confronted the X-Men and their offshoot teams many times on her own, particularly the New Mutants I believe, and was at the center of a big line-wide crossover with Necrosha recently. However, having say Sebastian Shaw get a singular entry wouldn't make as much sense because he has always been a part of the HC and never confronted the X-Men or anyone else outside of it or without a HC based goal in mind. Hope that clears it up a little more. There's a couple villains who I might remove too due to notability or how many times they've actually confronted the X-Men too. Let me know if you have any other questions or want to talk about how we can improve this more.68.55.153.254 (talk) 22:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, well, you were right in thinking that I don't really care for how it looks. Like I saw that J Greb said, what I agree with and strongly believe, is that these templates are mainly a navigational tool, and if you remove all the names, it remove the justification of being able to use the template on the character pages since they're no longer on it. I guess it's kind of a double edged sword in some ways, but I still firmly believe that these templates are very beneficial in being able to jump from name to name without having to go to another page to look up the name of someone else. I personally use it all the time when I'm going through various members pages to look up certain info, and I'm sure others have as well. So that's why I believe the names should stay, just with a better way to list some of the more secondary members and maybe more of a tighter grip on some of who should be put up, like with everything that happened with the handbooks recently. 68.55.153.254 (talk) 13:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Momo-1-.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Momo-1-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ozai.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ozai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Autoblock
Thank you! Jhenderson777 (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a problem - apologies for the inconvenience. Kuru   (talk)  20:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

List of minor Avatar: The Last Airbender characters
Thank for all your edits on List of minor Avatar: The Last Airbender characters. It's really hard for me to write that article since I don't watch the series myself and don't have the time to watch the episodes, which limits me mostly to organizational and low-depth penetration of the topic. I've added more characters to the list of recurring characters, if you don't mind providing more of your expertise :) Cheers! — Code Hydro  21:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Color topics
Template:Color topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --- cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 00:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

List of Spider-Man (1994 TV series) episodes
Hey, thanks for your note. You need to simply follow the instructions at WP:FLC (under "Nomination procedure") and things will be fine. A quick word of advice however, I think your list could use a peer review before being nominated for featured status. Let me know if you need more information, and good luck! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Albums by artist
Just so you know, I am in the middle of creating categories for albums by different artists, so there is no need to revert my additions of these categories when I create the category only minutes later. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It is much easier to add a new category to an article first, save it, then click on the red-linked category, then click save on that to create it. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The categories I remove from an article become parents to the categories I create. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Jhenderson777/X-Men: First Class (film)
Hello there! I just wanted to commend you on your work on the draft of X-Men: First Class. Keep it up! (Oh, and I made a small update, I hope you don't mind.) Cliff smith  talk  16:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Damn hah
It took me like three minutes to figure out I didn't really have a message. Damn you! Hahahaha --☯ The Dark Lord of Wiki ☯ ( talk) 15:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Override
Here is the code. You could probably put it on one of your user pages and use it as a personal template:   It reportedly produces differing results depending on your browser and personal CSS selection. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I really appreciate it. It took a while to figure out but I finally got the hang of it. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhino-2-.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rhino-2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Spider-Man article in need of help
I am placing this request for help on your talk page because you placed your name on the list of users in the Spider-Man work group. The article The Gauntlet and Grim Hunt has a lot of tags for a lot of problems with the article. It will be a lot of work to fix the article, but many hands make light work (you are one of 4 people I am specifically contacting). Please do not do massive deletions, but rather revisions. And most importantly, do not delete a tag until the problem has been solved. During this revision process please remember to write edit summaries so other editors know what is happening. Thank you for your help! Spidey 104 contribs 17:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * THANKS FOR YOUR HELP ON THE ARTICLE, but it would be GREAT if you could continue to help as much as you are able to . Can you clarify your statements on my talk page? I asked questions there about it. Spidey  104 contribs 20:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I misinterpreted your statement. I thought you were done editing the article for good, not done editing it for now. Thanks again for your advice and hopefully we'll be able to get that article into top form soon. Spidey  104 contribs 13:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It's going well, but I have been busy too. So it is going in bits and pieces. There has been some help from Cameron Scott, so it's fine for right now. Spidey  104 contribs 20:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

X-Men: First Clas film project
Just wanted to give you the heads up that the X-Men: First Class film project article has been nominated for deletion.-5- (talk) 18:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah I noticed. It's ok. The film should be coming this month anyway. Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * May as well add more sourced content in order to show that the topic is now too well covered to be be folded into the series article. As is seen in th tewo examples given at the AFD, in order to support a "project article" is is imperative to oversource and show the overwhelming coverage that meets GNG... showing the persistence of coverage and its depth.  Also, it might be prudent to write two sourced sentences in the series article that then redirects to the larger spinout topic.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Filming has started, so I guess it's time to move the Userspace article to X-Men: First Class (film).-5- (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Avatar: Legend of Korra
Hi. I understand thats the real name, I am just moving the original history to this name. The title will be as you say. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 02:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't try to delete anything yet. The sources are not obvious which one is the real name yet. And the Wikia version uses the latest name I used. And since they are both common names, one of them still has to stay a redirect. Feel free to explain what you are doing. Jhenderson  7 7 7  02:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I understand. This is just technical, nothing controvercial, the name will be as you say it is. Dont worry. ;) Rehman(+) 02:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Inre this edit...
You are quite welcome to review the discussion and share your own thoughts. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Ahhh... so now I have a homework assignment? I'll see what I can do.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Article rescue
Article rescue to improve the article is allowed. WritersCramp (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

dig through these...
"Ozai"+"Avatar" -inpublisher:icon  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for X-Men: First Class (film)
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 06:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Response
Thanks for removing the vandalism from my user page.-5- (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Avatar: Legend of Korra
 — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 00:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Legend of the Guardians
FYI, there is a discussion on the film article's talk page here. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Superhero
I think it's perfect! Iconic pose, classic look. I think it illustrates the word "superhero" perfectly. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Fictional history of Green Goblin
I've cut out another 20,000 characters/letter spaces. There's damnably much more to do, but I did a chunk. If you have time to go through and add issue dates where indicated, that would help us a lot. I'll be back to this, but I need a little time off. SUCH a big project. Somehow bigger than the Spider-Man fictional history! --Tenebrae (talk) 02:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Green Lantern edits
As per your edit summary:
 * I see your point of why you don't want it here but it's not legit. 
 * This is constructive material on the article. I don't like your constant reverting 
 * and I know you will keep on doing it if I don't unhide this. That is unacceptable.

Then I would suggest that you utilize the article talk page to make a convincing argument to keep it in. I feel that the article about the film should have information about the film only, not Sherlocking about what might happen sometime down the line in the films. As you well know (judging from your interest in superhero films), a lot of the history gets juggled around when 2D is converted to 3D. We do not know that Ferris is becoming the Sapphire in the course of this film, or even if it is to occur in the course of the (thus far unannounced) sequel. Until we have that, we have no place for it in the article at all. As an aside, I thought I'd let you know that your moving graphics sow down the load of this page considerably, You might wish to consider removing one or both of them. :) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Response
This is the latest article I could find regarding the film's villain, and in the article there's no specific mention as far as who the villain actually is. I would say until someone provides a reliable source stating who the specific villain of the film is that it needs to be removed.-5- (talk) 13:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CadBane.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CadBane.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cad Bane
Hello! Your submission of Cad Bane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Avoiding redirects at Planet
Redirects work perfectly well, so why bother to make these edits? It just makes for clutter on the editing page. Rothorpe (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Still pointless to revert it though. I will revert it for you when I have the time. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  22:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm watching!!! Rothorpe (talk) 00:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * You're watching what? I am pretty sure you have that article on the watchlist. I already reverted my edit. I also placed a few sources where it was tagged that it needed some. Don't expect me to do an edit that's not Good Faith. Basically I am reading that article and seeing what I can do from there. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Pointless redirects like the one I just removed, Neo-Assyrian, as opposed to mere Neo-Assyrian, which in edit mode is less than half as long & just as effective. Anyway, I'll let you get on with whatever else you're doing & have a look later. Ciao! Rothorpe (talk) 00:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I am rolling my eyes at how much you think it matters. An revert and removal of it is just as pointless. But anyways that edit was before I realized you were reverting. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Granted it doesn't matter very much. Just looks dumb, that's all. Rothorpe (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Well I guess I see your point of view. Even though it's not going to be noticeable except on the editable portion of it where it doesn't really doesn't matter what it looks like. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

It does matter. It's a courtesy to other editors to have an edit page that reads easily & makes sense. Rothorpe (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Avoiding redirections helps with that. Doesn't make it worse. What are you expecting them to read, the editing portion. That part ain't used for that. In my experience there's nothing wrong with redirects but they aren't perfect, in fact they are a little less perfect than using the main name of the article. But still it wasn't necessary with what I did compared to fixing it on a navigation box but still nothing wrong with it. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the milk! Have some yourself... Rothorpe (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Cad Bane
<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 06:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Ah, I think I've become pretty efficient over my years of editing.-5- (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Who's this? Just kidding! And that's ok. It seems like you have the time to do so. Right? − Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You see, I'm constantly getting better all the time.-5- (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Ha ha! − Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Green Goblin
Thank goodness for your hard work and your efforts! I hope that what I was able to contribute helped, and I'll be more than glad to go take a look and, hopefully, add third-party background from books and such. I applaud you! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series)
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CadBane.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CadBane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  00:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem
You don't seem to have been notified of the copyright problems raised in regards to Cad Bane. I need to make sure you are aware that our copyright policy forbids both literal duplication and close following of copyrighted sources. While information is free for reuse, you must put that information into your own words, except where you are using direct and clearly marked quotations. Although the article had already been redirected prior to its coming due for evaluation at the copyright problems board, I agree that the content constituted a concern. For one example, compare the following from our article:


 * With the source:

Revision here is very thin. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid such concerns in the future. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:01, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I understand. That's why I am userfying it. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

please don't merge a hours after a merge discussion has begun and only one person has said anything
What you did at Fictional history of Green Goblin was wrong. When someone suggest a merge discussion, then have a discussion, just don't go off and do it. I have reverted you of course.  D r e a m Focus  20:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Me merging this was planned already before he did that. Since I created it I also felt like uncreating it. It has nothing to do with that consensus which I knew wouldn't be active because it's never active there. Please don't judge. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Reply
We'll have to wait until that link gets archived at Archive.org. That was an interview conducted directly with that website, so it won't be found at any other website. But, references with dead links aren't exactly that horrible. At least it was referenced in the first place.-5- (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah I understand. I just like them confirmed. ;) − Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

And to you!
What a thoughtful post! Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours today as well! With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 16:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Back at'cha
Happy thanksgiving right back. And by the way, you were mentioned by F.R Durant HERE, and I then mentioned you in a discussion HERE. Which is perhaps why he wrote you. I think that together, you two could create the best article possible.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I'm a little late, but thanks. I hope you had a good one as well.-5- (talk) 10:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about the edit conflicts on the Spider-Man articles. It's just difficult when we're only dealing with rumors, and it's hard to judge what has credibility or not. I've made some edits to your reboot article and the film series article that I hope are good compromises.-5- (talk) 12:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Spider man reboot
Hi again, i need help and i have a suggestion. Why dont we combine both of our accounts to form an official spider man reboot page. We keep mine and you add your references and stuff to my page. As for help, i need help adding inline references on my page, which im sure yout can help me out on. Then after all of that is done, if you want we can userfy the page to both our names until were ready to make it public. Let me know F.R Durant (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't want to discourage you, but I suggest you move your article to your sandbox and get help if you don't know how. With all due respect what you propose is a waste of time. Henderson's article is far more extensive and cited than yours. If you wish to contribute to the forthcoming article you should be editing his article. We have an expression here on wikipedia "don't bite the newbies", but as I warned you before it is very difficult to create a new wikipedia article. There are editors with years of experience and tens of thousands of edits who have created only a handful of articles. You may think I'm a WP:DICK and untrustworthy, but by putting your article up for deletion I knew you would get help from people more experienced than I. Trust me your article could have easily been speedily deleted in which case there'd be no discussion at all, and all your edits would be lost. --Wlmg (talk) 00:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright wilmg, youve regained my trust, just wanted to be sure if i could trust you, you know like a test, lol. I agree. We should just delete my article and add to his. I'll contribute to it as best as i can and you should remove the user tag from the page too henderson, when you feel its the right time. Ill change my vote on the discusion page to delete and you can remove it from public veiw wilmg, i agree that article looks like it was written by a newby, lol, but you gotta admit, for a first article it was pretty good? F.R Durant (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * You seem to have a good grasp as to how to format an article with sections and boxes. I'll show you some tools like WP:Twinkle that make adding inline cites a snap if you want.--Wlmg (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry if I took a long while to reply. I am sort of on a Wikibreak this week. I really suggest the the same thing that User:Wlmg said. You can userfy your own article if you want it saved or you can edit on my own userspace. Will that work? − Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Help
I need help! I tried to edit your spider man reboot article and something went wrong! Can you take a look and see what went wrong? F.R Durant (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * It's all good. It was reverted. You can revert too if you mess it up, near the editing button there's a history button that shows all contributions. Go to it and undo that certain edit by pushing the undo button. I also recommend you read this to know how to edit on Wikipedia. ;) − Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Heh
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Hello Jhenderson777,  Reh  man has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! 06:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. That's a two minute gap! :)  Reh  man 06:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Sorry, I was out of town on Saturday and too tired to do any editing yesterday. I'm going to get to the Spider-Man articles next.-5- (talk) 15:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * That was the date given, but I don't think it's a good idea to create the article until we know for sure it has started.-5- (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, but I despise redirects and always prefer direct linking.-5- (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the Thanksgiving wishes. I hope you had a good holiday as well. Spidey 104  17:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I removed some unnecessary double spaces.-5- (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem.-5- (talk) 02:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Feedback on Spider-Man
How do you add such feedback box at the bottom? Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 08:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Quentin Beck.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Quentin Beck.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Villain confirmation for reboot?
Superhero Hype has reported that Curt Connors' son has been cast, and that Rhys Ifans is definitely playing Connors/the Lizard. (link) I added Billy Connors and his actor to the reboot article, but should we go ahead and just say Ifans is playing Connors/the Lizard. This isn't a confirmation from Sony, but the evidence for this is starting to mount up. What do you think?-5- (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I didn't care which one was used, it just seemed redundant to have two sources that say the same thing. Actually, if you read the Superhero Hype! reference they made it seem like they were breaking the story, but the Heat Vision reference is dated a day earlier, so we should go with that one.-5- (talk) 19:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictures
How come certain pictures don't show up in the Human penis article despite being in the edit box. Can you fix that? LittleJerry (talk) 03:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks LittleJerry (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

AFD
I hope you did not take offense to my comment in the AFD discussion. Just so you know I think you are good editor and a valued contributor.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you! No I didn't take offense, probably was a little discouraged that I did something stupid, but hey we all do that some times. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If only I had a nickel for everytime I made a mistake on here, I could quit my day job.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * lol. Good one. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  23:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not really a valued contributor though. At least I haven't felt like one lately. :} − Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * You have to keep in mind that Wikipedia isn't a social network. We write and edit articles with only a short description in the edit summary. We rarely come together unless its to resolve a conflict. This makes Wikipedia very impersonal so rarely do we acknowledge other editors contributions. But I've seen work on number of articles and I think I can say for all of us editors and readers alike that your contributions would be missed.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh I am not leaving Wikipedia. I know Wikipedia isn't a social network. Check here. But I do need to cool off from all due to all the heated debates I have been. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Hope this helps,


 * Thanks!!! I really feel like I am not deserving of considered a good editor today but hopefully that's just a today thing. I went too far on some edits today and swallowed my pride. But I will trust your judgement and I do have to admit this does make a good Wikipedia Christmas gift. :D − Jhenderson  7 7 7  02:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Untitled Spider-Man Reboot
Hello! Your submission of Untitled Spider-Man Reboot at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Interior (Talk) 07:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * sorry for the impersonal template, but it has all the links :-) The Interior (Talk) 07:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Untitled Spider-Man Reboot
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, see the talk page of Half-Blood Prince for that. A decision was made to look DH (film) more cohesive, so I decided to do this for all the films in an effort of uniformity and of organisation. Sorry, I'll fix those broken refs. Evil Genius77 (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand
Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Also, the editnotice on this page is awfully big. It would be more considerate to other users if you could take a moment to trim it a little bit so that people don't have to scroll down to find the edit box when they post on your talk page. Thank you, <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Archiving should take care of it but not all of it is doing what it should. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not referring to the length of this page (which is what the archiving deals with), I'm referring to the length of the editnotice located at User talk:Jhenderson777/Editnotice, which is over two screens long and which people have to scroll past every time they want to post on this page. <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I was in edit conflict with you and you beat me. What I was going to do was delete my original comment and say my minor editing is a habit and I will see with what I can do with the edit notice. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * "It's a habit" doesn't mean it's right. Edits like these are not minor and should not be marked as such. If you can't remember to uncheck the "minor" box when making non-minor edits, you can disable it in your preferences. <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry but please calm down, this isn't really something worth going on about like you are. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not "going on" and I never assumed bad faith. I left you a standard message about an editing policy and I left you a note about how to set your preferences. As for whether this is "worth it", per Help:Minor edit (which you clearly haven't taken the time to look at), "the distinction between major and minor edits is significant". Instead of looking for a fight, just listen to the simple advice and get on with it. <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I understand. But I prefer the friendly suggestive way to advise it instead of the I am in authority over you way. I have been doing minor edits most of the time so I wrongly tagged minor edits this time without thinking. Nobody's perfect! I don't even remember myself doing it purposely. By the way, I have read that guideline before. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I sometimes accidently push the button when trying to save the page sometimes as well. ;)− Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

List of programs and machines in the Matrix series
I would like to continue improving the incubated article List of programs and machines in the Matrix series, and I started a discussion requesting comments about what edits should be made so it can be restored in the near future. Since you supported incubation, I invite you to the discussion. It can be found here. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Merry Christmas!
Thanks, same to you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Need opinions on photos
Hi. A disagreement has arisen over which of two photos would be better as the main Infobox image for the Ben Templesmith article. Can you participate in this discussion? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 04:45, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Spider-Man template
I changed it because the way it had been put brackets within the brackets and I thought that was confusing. Take a look at what I've changed it to now. I think this is even better. Spidey 104  19:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I like the Spider-Woman template you started. Spidey  104  19:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Appa and Momo for deletion
The article Appa and Momo is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Appa and Momo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <b class="IPA">r ʨ anaɢ</b> (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Image on Spider-man reboot
The problem with this image as opposed to those other images on the other film articles is that they were seemingly taken by Wikipedia users. This image is credited to MTV.com, which is a big problem.-5- (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, we've been discussing our issues on the talk page. And I'm not going to change the way I edit. If I see bad edits I'm going to revert them, remove them, whatever. I'm not going to let someone make bad edits just for the sake of cooperation.-5- (talk) 18:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * One more thing, I think I ignore/accept a lot more edits than I revert. It's just that the only edits that will be seen by me are the reverts. No one will notice all of the edits I let go by. If anyone wants proof I'll take a screen capture of my Watchlist page.-5- (talk) 18:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You need to take that problem on the image not the article itself if you feel the image doesn't comply with free use. Reverting bad edits are fine (and if it is obviously a bad edit, it can't be a bad edit just because of your point of view definitely if it's a good faith edit, that's why a edit summary is there, and if it a good faith edit you have to explain why you are reverting either in the talk page in the edit summary [no if, and's and but's about it, if it's obviously not vandalism it's probably good faith]. And trust me people have been blocked by avoiding the three revert rule. So please don't go with that's the way I am when it comes to edit conflict. You have to control yourself in Wikipedia to be a Wikipedian and I struggle with that sometimes as well. Wikipedia is full of people that differ in opinions. This is just a advise from a respected colleague from mine that honestly I feel is a better editor than me. It's fine that you do multiple edits but edit summary's are more necessary than we give them credit for. If you creating space use the word "space", if you are avoiding redirection or disambiguation than state that you are doing it. And have a stay cool and bite the newcomers attitude and all that and you will stay a good editor which I know you are. Basically treat users as important as the article itself is what I am saying. − Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Look, I've been editing on here for close to five years now. I think I've improved a lot since then. There's nothing that you're telling me now that I haven't told by other users at least two, three, or four years ago. I've improved in areas you've mentioned. But, this is how I want to edit now. I don't own any articles. I'm volunteering my time just like anyone else, and if that's the case I'm going to use that time how I see fit. If anyone's got a problem with it, then report me, I don't care. Block me, ban me, whatever. It will merely free up my time. I was retired once before, and I came back. If my contributions aren't appreciated, then good luck everyone. Let's just let everyone add unconstructive edits, unreferenced/unverified information and vandalism to their heart's content. If you think my behavior reeks of ownership now then you should have followed me before my brief retirement in late 2009-early 2010. I think I'm a lot more lenient and cooperative now. I can't believe I've written a whole paragraph about this, this is so stupid. And here's my edit summary for this:

-5- (talk) 17:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * lol. Ok then. ;b I don't really have room to be talking actually. You're a better contributor than I could ever be. And we will just leave it to that. I didn't really mean to offend you. I can understand why some people can be offended at advise. Personally I love advise so I wasn't thinking about how it maybe could offend you. So sorry about that! Keep up the good work! − Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * And seriously I relate not using the edit summary some times. So like I said no room to be talking. And being such a valid contributor I would think of you more than five years. What's your trick of being one of the 400 most active contributors for just five years just out of curiosity and respect. ;) −  Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as a jerk. I think I've listened to the Christian Bale rant too many times recently.-5- (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

"Feature" vs. "feature film"
If it seems that wrong to your ear, then I guess I can go along with you if you want to change it back to "feature film." Either way is correct (though the latter does seems redundant to me), and at the end of the day, being accurate is the most important thing. I'm not sure one would say "feature movie" -- "movie" being a synonym of "film" and thus meaning the same thing -- but I respect your work, and part of being a community means sometimes giving in to the other guy. Go for it, dude! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Films based on comics task force
Hello! At the talk page for WikiProject Film, I have proposed a films based on comics task force, which would be a collaboration between WikiProject Film and WikiProject Comics. TriiipleThreat mentioned you as someone who may be interested in the task force, so I invite you to join the discussion. The discussion can be found here. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding the articles! Let me know if you have any ideas for the task force. I am thinking that I would like to have the first real discussion to be about whether or not The Dark Knight Rises should be a stand-alone article or not, and how to structure it if so. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 17:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I've been asked to weigh in. I'm placing a comment at Talk:The Dark Knight Rises. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

online ambassador role
Thanks for you interest in being an Online Ambassador. Let me know what you'd like to know more about, and I'll try to give you quick answers.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool. I look forward to seeing an application from you, if you do have time!  There's some information about how to be an effective mentor here: Online Ambassadors/Guidelines.  Like most things on Wikipedia, it's a work in progress, but I think it's got some good advice so far.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, your last message slipped through without me noticing until now... how does the application work? The application process is described here: Online_Ambassadors.  Generally you'll hear back within a few days or a week, often sooner.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 03:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Dark Knight Rises
It cannot have its own article just yet, it's still in developmental phases. Per WP:NFF, it needs to at least start production (which won't be till May 2011).  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  15:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

See. Jhenderson 7 7 7  16:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm not particularly pleased that you went ahead and started an article for this. I really think it should have waited.-5- (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You're not the only one. Sorry for the inconveniance. In fact I kind of wish it was back as a redirection myself. Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think I mainly feel that way because we have been telling other users for months not to create an article until production starts. Now it feels a little hypocritical and I wonder how other users would use this as leverage to create articles for other films that have yet to start production.-5- (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I could have sworn that at one point Batman Begins did have Batman & Robin listed as "preceded by". The section is meant to include films that are part of a series of films. The fact that continuity is changed and restarted doesn't negate the fact that it's part of a series. For all intents and purposes, Shumacher's Batman films have no actual connection to the Burton films. The only carry over is Pat Hingle who continued to play the role of Commissioner Gordon. The tone, style, everything is different between Burton's films and Shumacher's films (so I don't really know why they are being connected on the Batman in film page). Apart from Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, none of the Bond films are actual sequels. They are all stand alone films, but they all list the next Bond film in the infobox because they are part of a series of films. There has been a lot of debate about this in the Film Project, and I'm sure there will be further debate, because the question becomes "What defines a 'series' of films". Either you're defining it by continuity, or you're defining it by who is producing the product. In the case of Batman, one could argue that the only real "series" are the 2 Burton films, then 2 Shumacher films, then 2 (+1) Nolan films and none should be connected to the other. Or, you could say that Warner Bros. produced all of them and just restarted the continuity with Nolan and they're all part of the greater "film series" featuring Batman.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Your eyes...
Think this one is worth improving?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Voice-actors site
I say go for it. According to its FAQ page, BehindTheVoiceActors.com is not a wiki, doesn't take user submissions, and makes very clear that if a reader claims a mistake in the database then he or she has to provide "actual proof." Here's what the site itself says: "Our site is not perfect but unlike user submitted sites like imdb, wikipedia or tv.com our sources come from official voice actor websites, resumes, DVD credits and other legitimate sources. We do make mistakes sometimes. If you feel strongly that we made a credit mistake we would be more than happy to correct it, but only if you provide a legitimate source. We're sorry that we can't just take your word for it. We need actual proof."

I'd say to use the above blockquote, taken from here, as a legitimate rationale if someone has questions about this site. Nice find, dude! --Tenebrae (talk) 02:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jurassic Park 10.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jurassic Park 10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Dark Knight Rises
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   12:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Charmeleon
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pokémon/Archive_27 - There is your "consensus". It somewhat meets notability requirements, but isn't very strong. All of it is either "Charmeleon along with its evos are x", or "Charmeleon is a middle child". <sub style="color:#00008B;">Blake (Talk·Edits) 03:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Template change
Hey, thanks for the heads up about your change to the template. It is on my watchlist, but I appreciated the comment on my talk page. I agree with you that having that stuff there is redundant since there is the publications template. Spidey 104  01:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

The Amazing Spider-Man
Hello, we cannot have two disambiguation pages. Think about it, if someone searches "The Amazing Spider-Man", they end up at the comic book series article, then they click on the disambiguation link, then they click on "The Amazing Spider-Man (film)", then they can click on "The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film)". My opinion is that The Amazing Spider-Man itself should be a disambiguation page. I've already started discussion about it here. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fine. I like that idea better. As long as it's not being redirected to where it's originally at. ;) Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Whoops, I did forget to fix that. :) I think the disambiguation page approach works because it's likely that the 2012 film will dominate all the other topics for a long, long time. Maybe at some point it could become the primary topic, but it seems fair to show all the topics up front at The Amazing Spider-Man. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

close article for deletion(the dark knight rises)
Please help me close this discussion, i want to remove the deletion tag from the page as soon as possible. F.R Durant (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

re: request
Didn't mean to offend you, that comment was direct everyone. Your doing a great job!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh no. You should be getting my late message just about now. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

As always
...you are kind and gracious. I appreciate your comments, including noting that Milburn and I might have gone too far. We'll see what happens, I guess. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Article deletion discussion
Hi. Can you voice your opinion on the Beth Sotelo deletion discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NicolaeCarpathia.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NicolaeCarpathia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Info
You are correct. I did not know. Thanks for the info. Spidey 104  14:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

S.H.I.E.L.D. template
Based on your previous edits to the S.H.I.E.L.D. template you might have an opinion on a discussion I recently started. Spidey 104  22:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Batman antagonists
Hi Henderson,

Are you still planning on implimenting Template:Batman/antagonists? If it's not likely to be ready for transclusion in the near future, I would recommend moving it to your userspace. Otherwise, it will likely get speedily deleted as a T3.

Neelix (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Ultimate Spidey
Sure. Glad to help. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject G.I. Joe
Welcome to the project! Our paths have crossed before, but I admire the work that you've done on several comic book related articles, and I love what you've done with your user page! Hope that you can help with our current endeavor, merging some of the smaller G.I. Joe character articles into the lists of characters. Feel free to drop me a line if you want, and I look forward to hearing from you! Fortdj33 (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

 * Thank you. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Former film project articles
Ok, I'm obviously wrong, in some sense, about the existence of Category:Former film project articles. Please tell me why it should exist. --79.68.237.87 (talk) 20:16, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm tempted to call your response "Zen". But it was civil and informative, so thank you.  --79.68.237.87 (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I can see why you'd say that if it were a well-populated category. The practice is, certainly, to not mess with categorisation while a discussion is ongoing.


 * If you want, I will revert myself. But I will note it down as the day that led to Category:Formerly living persons. --79.68.237.87 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Not a Sunday Editor?
You mean to say that you do most of your editing while you're at work? Shaaaaaaame :P -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If there is any reaon why I don't edit on Sundays. It's a religous one. But I do edit on Sundays sometimes. I work at home. For right now I am a unofficial author. This is my other work. :b Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Narnia
Would you mind withdrawing the Peer Review? You can find the process for that at Peer review. Since we've started re-vamping it now anyways, maybe we can resubmit it a later when we're done; just so that someone else doesn't start reviewing it and get confused about what's going on. -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Alrighty, as discussed, closed the peer review. BTW, thanks for the Barnstar :) -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

AfDs
I saw your comments at Articles for deletion/Superman (film project) and just wanted to say that AfDs do not have to be a bad thing. In certain circumstances like this it give us something physical to point as a previous consensus for future discussions. They can sometimes be a useful tool.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The problem is the people who create a AFD are partly right. Yet we are going to have a cliche on creating these kind of articles. That's why we need a consensus on making these kind of articles first. We need to create articles that any editor can agree on when to have it. Or at least it would be better to do that. The Dark Knight Rises was snowball kept in the AFD (so that was one was fine) this I can tell that there is going to be some debate. I didn't think we needed to split this one yet. It's still fine as a section per WP:Split in my opinion but at least there are sources for this one. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The problem isnt with the AfD process, if you feel the article should be merged because of WP:SPLIT or something else that is fine but AfDs themselves shouldn't be reason to stop from us from expanding Wikipedia.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Due to what you thought I meant I had to to be more specific on what I meant. Because it's not really what I mean too much. Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

GI Joe PR
Hi Jhenderson777. Sorry to say, but I'm overbooked. I hope someone picks up GI Joe from the queue. Finetooth (talk) 01:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I am confused as to what you are asking me to do. Since you did not nominate Wikipedia:Peer review/G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)/archive1, why are you asking me to review it? I usually only repsond to requests from nominators, and I am swamped at the moment in real life and on Wiki. Can you please clarify your request? Thanks, Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ruhrfisch, sorry for the confusion. I was the one who posted the original request to review Wikipedia:Peer review/G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)/archive1.  I did another review for Jhenderson777 (The Chronicles of Narnia) and ended up editing it as well, and he's helping me out by finding a reviewer for mine. -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the explanations - I am pretty busy right now, but will try to get to it in a few days. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 19:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, and thanks. If you get really swamped, please let me know and I'll keep looking.  Cheers. -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Monsters University
As one of the more active contributors on the Articles for deletion/Superman (film_project) discussion, I thought I'd alert you to this "future film" article, and wondered whether you had anything to add at Talk:Monsters University... --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

RE: Jacen Solo
Y'know, I was always planning on merging Jacen Solo into that, but I never got round to it. I'd recommend merging it. Harry Blue5 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll see if I can trim it. Deciding what the most important details are and the deleting ones that aren't is always annoying though. I might just go in and replace the whole "History" section and start from scratch with a much more brief and less detailed "Appearances" one. Harry Blue5 (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think we might have to split the EU characters, though it makes me sad to do so. Formatting the list is going to be heck either way though, for EU characters we probably have no choice but to format it like the current list. I mean, there are like over 5,000 EU characters (not many franchises can say that, y'know...) Harry Blue5 (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Narnia
I just wanted to take a moment and say "Well done" on the Chronicles of Narnia article. You have really improved the article and inspired other people to get involved as well. LloydSommerer (talk) 01:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Umm, thanks? :P -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 04:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * To Jake I started trying to improve it first with my sandbox (which I wasn't quite complete yet I was planning on summing up the lead last). But I got to give Jake credit because he has basically done most of the work afterwards. I could say I did inspire him to do so though. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  14:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * True enough, if you hadn't gotten it polished enough to submit it for Peer Review, I would never have bothered trying. Hopefully it won't take us too long to get this to GA and then FA! -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

FYI - the copy edit is finished. Just need to address a couple of points that Philg88 left and we can probably send it back into the queue for Peer Review. Feel free to do what you can, I've got the sharks circling one of my other articles, and I need deal with them asap :) -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Superman man of steel article
I need to know if my superman man of steel article is ready to be made public, i dont want to un-userfy it and it ends up getting deleted or something. Thanks F.R Durant (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Obviously you weren't updated. It's out as a film project article. But your sandbox is good for when it starts filming. Also you may join in and share your thoughts about it at the AFD for the film project article as long as you be civil and nice about it. Cheers.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * And also your sandbox still isn't ready because it's designed as a film article not a film project article. (the infobox etc.). I have a question for you would you rather your sandbox be a article incubator? Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Sure, why not, as long as I dont lose the article F.R Durant (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Chip in, please
Based upon recent discussions in several places, I have begun work on an essay that seeks to clarify just how and when discussuion of a film-before-its-filmed would per policy merit inclusion in some manner, or per GNG even merit a seperate article. Please look over User:MichaelQSchmidt/Future Films and offer your insights. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Dr Doom edit request
Saw your edit request on Guild of Copy Editors' page. I am willing to do it, but I'm a slow editor and might take several days before I'm done, consulting you (on the Dr Doom talk page) all the way when I am in doubt about correcting grammar but potentially changing meanings. If you want me to pass on this, don't reply. Otherwise let me know (here or on my talk page). Regards Peter S Strempel  &#124;  Talk   04:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

a related discussion to the earlier
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Future films Your comments toward my attempt at clarity are quite welcome.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

help on wikipedia article
My superman reboot article has been made public, you can check it out, i edited it a little more but someone has made a duplicate article and i need it deleted, its called "man of steel". Mines was obviously started first(if you check the edit history) and mines is obviously better sourced. He has also redirected my article and placed his as the primary article, please fix this for me and delete this guys article, ive been working on my article for so long and now some guy comes along after me and thinks hes going to start up a new one when i already had an article, this is starting to piss me off. Please have this article deleted, and please get my article back, otherwise, im done with wikipedia, thanks F.R Durant (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Roger Rabbit concerns
Hi, I do a lot of peer reviews (there are 19 waiting at Peer review/backlog/items right now and just two people now do the majority of all the reviews there) so unfortunately I do not have time to edit Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Good luck and thanks for your work on it, Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 18:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

It's live
See Future Films  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Wario PR
I saw the Wario peer review had been archived without a lot of comments, so I reviewed it too. Please ask if you want me to reopen the PR. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to know my comments were useful. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Sorry for the length in between replies. I have been having computer problems and as such have had very limited opportunities to do much real editing beyond basic upkeep and maintenance. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

The Clone Wars characters
I've started a list for Star Wars: The Clone Wars characters in my userspace. See here for discussion and details. Just thought you'd be interested. Harry Blue5 (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

"eve"
The middle letters of revert perhaps? --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I've noticed a delay in the edit screen being ready to edit recently. Maybe you thought you'd clicked away or something, but instead some of the text you typed in the edit summary appeared on the page.  No idea really, just noticed that both times it happened, your edit summaries started with "revert".  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation
Can help solve a problem with a new user at Talk:Thor (film) I do not wish to edit war with him.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Raintheone
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Requests for comment/Raintheone regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. If you have the time, please participate by reviewing the summary that has been prepared, and giving your opinion as to what can be done. Thank you! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation
Thank you for the invitation. Kurt Parker (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Double Whammy
<i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 11:09 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you!! I appreciate it. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Darth Bane
I think the Darth Bane article could work better if reworked to be about the Darth Bane series as a whole, what do you think? Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Since the main WikiProject Comics Noticeboard has not been significantly updated since 2009, and since the 2011 merger/move noticeboard is seldom used, I'm asking a few Project members to spread the word that this page exists and that there is a current merge proposal at WikiProject Comics/Notice board/Requested moves/2011. Thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Comic-related improvements
Hi, i'd like to bring to your attention a few comic-related articles that could definetly use a touch up:


 * List of Dick Tracy villains - There could be a little more detail as to the descriptions of the villans.


 * Captain Compass - I read the occasional comic of this detective and there are several claims on it that seem false. "He teams up with the Martian Manhunter to save Black Canary after Two-Face takes her hostage"? Sounds incredibly unrealistic. "He helps out the Justice League after Green Arrow departs"? Not true at all.


 * Agent Cheesecake - More detail could be used in this article and some more references as to some of her adventures with She-Hulk and Glob.


 * Hamilton Hill - The article has no references or sources.


 * Doctor Manhattan - I've always felt maybe this character and maybe the other Watchmen who has no articles yet to receive seperate articles like Rorscach and Ozymandias (hope i spelt that right).


 * Scarlet Skier - Also cites no sources or references. It's also been neglected since 2010.

Maybe these could be wiki projects the Comics task force could give aide to. Please reply and i could even help out (i want to expand my mind with the joy of comics). <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 23:26 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I am tempted to say that all the main Watchmen characters deserve articles. I do believe they had there own article and was AFD'd but the result was keep but they were merged anyways. Sounds like a discussion needs to be made on the List of characters in Watchmen about that. A few of those characters I am not sure of. Are they notable or not. I can probably know about their fictional biography in other Wiki's but that ain't going to help in other important information and citing. Right now I am a little busy doing something that needs to be done on comic book character article which is placing reception section on them which can help prove notability a little bit. But I will see with what I can do with these problems when the time comes. I definitely think the Watchmen characters can maybe deserve there own articles. But it can also be said that some Preacher characters (Jesse Custer, Herr Starr, Saint of killers) Kick Ass characters (Kick Ass, Hit-Girl etc.) maybe even the Scott Pilgrim character himself deserve their own articles as well. So we'll see with what we can do but if they do become articles they definitely need to be cited this time around though. Jhenderson 7 7 7  18:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * And also concerning the Dick Tracy villains list I like that format but I can also see the concern of wanting to know a little bit of wanting to know more about them. After all I have heard of good things about his rogues gallery. I will try to think of some options. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There actually is a discussion about the Watchmen on the talk page, which was asked back in March. No one replied. I suggested a poll to receive a more open consensus, should you want to contribute. <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 16:40 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok I plan on discussing. And I plan on previewing them as articles for a bit as well. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Changes to Columbus Dispatch page
Hi. I was just removing the sections that don't really have any historical significance. At least a couple appear to have been included to promote specific issues (Tina Resch and cartoon).

Digitalscoop (talk) 19:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: Cool Barnstar!
Thanks for the compliments. I always just use the Video game's WikiProject google search for reception, really. Lot of SW articles on IGN for some reason. Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Thanks for the kind words. I'm getting backed up at work not (Wiki addict that I am sometimes) so I'll get back on this in a few hours. Seers! --Tenebrae (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I should be able to tomorrow. Right now I have to deal with a new user making wildly inaccurate and slanderous accusations. Ah, well. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I read all of The Amazing Spider-Man so I am able to keep track of those storylines, but so far I haven't found any additions of One Moment in Time (comics) or any other recent storyline being added to the Spider-Man article. Maybe I looked in the wrong section, so point out where they are if I missed it. Thanks. Spidey  104  13:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FirstClass1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:FirstClass1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deleting it. Bignole is right, it's not that necessary when it came to that last image I uploaded came to Wikipedia. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  14:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for sending me my first Barnstar. I appreciate it! :) Hallows  Horcruxes  21:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

New Spider-Man article
As a member of the Spider-Man work group I am recruiting your help to expand and improve upon the new article about the "Big Time" story arc. Adding an image, preferably a cover to one of the issues, would be immensely helpful, but any and all help would be appreciated. (Note: I have not added it to the Spider-Man publications template yet because it is just started and I want it to be a better article before I add it to that.) Spidey  104  16:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Star Wars stuff
Yeah, I realise your busy with all your film articles, but I'd be interested in your opinion of adding another image for Starkiller and on merging the Max Rebo Band. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Film ambassador
The main goals of the Film ambassador would be to interface between WikiProject Film and WikiProject MoMA on article creation and improvement, responding to requests from museum staff, and assisting students engaged in MoMA educational outreach. It should be noted this would mainly be for older, classic or "arty" films, the kind that an institution like MoMA is most involved with preserving.--Pharos (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I regret to say we're going to pick someone else to be the Film ambassador for WikiProject MoMA, just because most of your great experience seems to be in newer, rather than in older films. Thanks, and we still very much welcome your general participation in the project!--Pharos (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Mostly. I have done a few serials but I think I will stick to with what I have for now. I would support Lugnuts though. Jhenderson  7 7 7  23:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Total Recall (2012 film)
Hello! Your submission of Total Recall (2012 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kiefer .Wolfowitz 10:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC). Kiefer .Wolfowitz 10:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

RE: Image size question
To resize an image use an editting program (e.g. Paint, GIMP and Photoshop). You probably already have Paint if you have a Microsoft computer. Be warned, Paint will destroy transparent backgrounds.

Another way to do it would be to upload the image, preview it as (or whatever) and then save the image from that and reupload it. Not really preferable for fair-use images but it works.

Feel free to ask if you need better detailed info. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

RE: Image size question
To resize an image use an editting program (e.g. Paint, GIMP and Photoshop). You probably already have Paint if you have a Microsoft computer. Be warned, Paint will destroy transparent backgrounds.

Another way to do it would be to upload the image, preview it as (or whatever) and then preview the image from that and reupload it. Not really preferable for fair-use images but it works.

Feel free to ask if you need better detailed info. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

RE: Original and prequel trilogy
I don't really have a problem with it. However, given the high traffic, importance and GA status of the Star Wars article, it would really be worth getting some further discussion for this. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There's probably a lot of reception of people insulting the prequels. The original trilogy will be harder, but there's probably some discussion about its iconicness. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I'm fine either way. Just, again, be careful. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Scope for Spider-Man: Big Time
For the new article I created we need to have a discussion about how big the scope of the article is going to be. I started the article trying to mimic the Spider-Man: Brand New Day article, but recent edits by other uses are changing the article away from that. We need to establish a consensus for the scope of this article so there are no edit wars and so the article can be concise and a quality article. Please post an opinion to the article's talk page where I have further elaborated on my point of view. Thank you. Spidey 104  14:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

DC Comics navbox
Thanks... I'll try to contribute! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stitchdog.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Stitchdog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Darth Vader's mask design
I have just noticed that Darth Vader's mask design bears a striking resembelence to an illustration from the New York World, "Space Invaders Threaten Earth" articule. See http://www.cracked.com/article/100_the-5-ballsiest-lies-ever-passed-off-as-journalism_p2/ 121.210.13.228 (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Dr Doom
Sorry that I appeared to have abandoned the Dr Doom edit, but I had a sudden and serious medical emergency and have only just returned to Wikipedia. I'm guessing you found someone else to finish the job. Regards. Peter S Strempel &#124;  Talk   21:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't remember any changes by the guild of copy editor's so you are still free to improve unless you don't want to. ;)  Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NeoMatrix.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NeoMatrix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

article for deletion
i happened across two articles the other day, one called delusional disorder and one just called delusion. The delusion page is great and im gonna try and edit it somemore, but the delusion disorder page is just full of jibberish, im going to nominate it for deletion. F.R Durant (talk) 22:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey, can you end the deletion discussion on delusional disorder, its been decided that it should be kept. i dont know how, lol thanks F.R Durant (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Avatar-legend-of-korra.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Avatar-legend-of-korra.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

inre User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines
You are cordially invited to User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as I feel its going live is imminent and I value additional eyes and input.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eddie Brock Sp3.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Eddie Brock Sp3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eddiebrock2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Eddiebrock2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment
This is a neutral request for comments concerning List of The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes episodes. The micro-series was recently changed from this to this. I would like your opinion on what is best presentation of this information as well if the episodes should be listed by the order they were aired or by the order they were produced. An ongoing discussion on the subject can be found here.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Medical articles
Hey, i need your help. Ive been trying to clean up the medical articles on wikipedia becuase people keep putting untrue and bias info on them but i just cant do it. everytime i try to tag the page for an expert to come in, they try to delete the tag. it doesnt make any sense. Theamazingspiderman20 (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Solar System navmap
Template:Solar System navmap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Missionimpossibleghostprotocolteaserposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Missionimpossibleghostprotocolteaserposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments
I invite you to leave your thoughts here. I noticed that you made some contributions to the discussion earlier, and I would very much appreciate some more input. The discussion became quite messy, so I thought it best to take it from the top, because frankly, at least some of my points need some attention. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 08:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Missionimpossibleghostprotocolteaserposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Missionimpossibleghostprotocolteaserposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. I definitely appreciate your work with it as well. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Batman work group
Hello! Just wanted to take a moment to let you know about the newly created Batman work group, a part of WikiProject Comics designed to improve the classification and coverage of Batman-related articles on Wikipedia. You are invited to join the group, by adding your name to the list of participants. Feel free to pass this message along, to anyone else you know who would be interested. Thank you for your time and consideration, and we look forward to hearing from you! Fortdj33 (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The  2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Spider-Man (2012)
Hiya, J., and thanks for the kinds words. I'll stop by that article sometime today. Always glad to hear somebody think my input can help! With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I was afraid someone else's edits might be extensive as well; I was taking a chance that the other editor (didn't know who it was) was just making a single change or two. Please do accept my apology after the fact as well. I'm signing off for now! Thank you again for the invite, and I'll come back when I can. Go work your magic! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll go do that right now. Again, my apologies. I probably should have copy-pasted my work to a word file, copy-pasted the other editor's edits into that, and copy-pasted the composite version back into Wikipedia. I feel badly about taking another editor's time and effort away. I appreciation your graciousness very much.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I made changes to every section, since I was fixing a lot of the author citations to last-name-first, as is standard in footnoting. AGAIN, I apologize. I don't know what else I can do to make things right.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't even know we had an "in use" template! Wow! Man, does this encyclopedia have a million unexplored nooks and crannies. THANK YOU for that! And believe me, it's 7:20 p.m. and I've spent all day writing a 2,600-word magazine article in-between my taking-a-break forays into Wikipedia &mdash; I am bushed! 'Night, amigo. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

RE: Your edit on The Amazing Spider-Man, an obvious term is generally something which someone would have to know about or something that is obvious, like if I said "this is an apple", you wouldn't need a link to know what an apple is. Realistically terms should be linked if they cannot be understood without further reading, like the links to Batman, I think there are a LOT of Batman links for a Spider-Man article but not everyone might know what Batman is, so a link might be useful. Something like sequels, people know what a sequel and a prequel are, so they'd be obvious. At least I think they are obvious. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for that. I really do understand what it it I was just meaning it can be debatable for some. I agree apple is obvious, internet should be obvious, tissue is obvious. Superhero being obvious meh it depends if your into fiction. But if I already knew it's on the lead I would have removed it. Halloween? It is mostly arond the world so I guess...  Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Avengers
We should always paraphrase. That said, when I look at the source for the Avengers plot and the Wiki page, it looks identical. It wasn't paraphrased at all, but copied verbatum.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  15:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Entertainment Weekly
Sure. Glad to help. Sometimes the Internet Archive (archive.org) will have old URLs saved. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * That's a valid point. My feeling is it's not WP:WEASEL because we specifically cite who "some writers" are, as opposed to just saying vaguely "some writers" and not specifying. Unless there's some specific reason to name a certain publication or website &mdash; as in, for instance, cases of original reporting where the credibility of the source publication is critical, as in "The Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein then uncovered the president's slush fund" &mdash; it seems redundant, as well as unduly promoting of those sites.


 * But other editors may feel differently &mdash; I wouldn't be averse to your asking some of the page's other editors about this, listing both our concerns. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not quite reading it the same way. He seemed to feel the comparison itself was weaselly, and also the phrase "reported as strikingly similar". I did note that you brought up at the time that you felt "some" was weaselly, but again, if we're citing specific people in the footnotes, I'm not sure giving them special prominence in the article body as well is warranted.


 * And I could be wrong. You might want to ask other editors for their opinion, as I suggested above. Or, leave it and see if the GA review feels that the specifically footnoted phrase "some writers" is weasel. I hope we haven't reached an impasse, but if we have, well, that's what our fellow editors are for!  :)   --Tenebrae (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The only other EW cite I saw was #7, and it seems to link OK. Or did you mean a non-EW cite?--Tenebrae (talk) 21:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Good eye! I totally missed that other footnote and the missing wikilinks. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Just got a press release from the Wikipedia Foundation saying English-language Wikipedia is staging a 24-hour blackout on Wednesday to protest (as well it should) the SOPA legislation before Congress. Darn good way to get people's attention to that bill. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I can tell. That is temporary ain't it. Jhenderson  7 7 7  17:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Never mind that. I heard it's 24 hours. Fine with me then because I am not a fan of those bills either. Jhenderson 7 7 7  18:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film)
Haven't had a chance to go there today, so I hadn't seen the edits. That section looks great now &mdash; pitch-perfect encapsulation of the facts and the issue. Bravo, dude! --Tenebrae (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, J. I think the article by and large is coming along just great!


 * I understand what you're saying about producers, and if a producer in a journalistic interview, with give-and-take and context, were to talk about the making of the movie and how and why specific decisions were made, I would think that would be notable, sure. But these quotes from the official press release are something different: Opinion quotes, written by publicists and vetted by the individuals, designed to promote their product. A producer's opinion that the actor he chose is wonderful and that he think we'll cheer him on really isn't notable in terms of imparting critical information; it goes without saying that they like their choice. There'll be plenty of producers' quotes to come that give data available nowhere or few places else. That's my thought process, anyway.


 * What you been working on here otherwise? I'm interviewing Willem Dafoe tomorrow, and clearing up uncited stuff in his Wikipedia article as I go along.--Tenebrae (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Yep, journalist. I'm meeting him and, I presume, his publicist, at a restaurant in Soho. Most of my interviews these days are over the phone, so it's a treat to do this in person and meet him &mdash; he blew me away in To Live and Die in L.A. and I've followed his work ever since. And in more important matters, brother, I hope you stick around Wikipedia for years to come &mdash; it needs careful, caring and meticulous editors like you! Now don't blush...! --Tenebrae (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * We'll definitely be talking a little about Spider-Man. I've just screened DVDs of two of his three new films (The Hunter and 4:44 Last Day on Earth and we're covering those and Disney's new John Carter. And believe me, everything I say is dead honest &mdash; carries over from work, where you really, really, really don't want to say anything untrue or inaccurate in print. I've seen enough questionable editing on Wikipedia that I genuinely appreciate the good editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, J. You're correct: Personal blogs are virtually always disallowed per WP:SPS. But professional news organizations, (even a small one like /Film if it's recognized by independent third parties as a reliable source) generally fall under WP:NEWSBLOG and are usable. The one thing I do try to remind my fellow editors of is to trace reports back to the original source: /Film, like many organizations, even major newspapers, often re-reports news attributed to another, generally linked source. Hope this helps! With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You're probably right about "Internet."


 * So I'm confused now: Was the /Film guy not reviewing the movie, but the trailer? The trailer ran with the sneak peek of the film itself? I guess I misread. Walk me through it. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Okey-doke. Clearly, I wasn't getting it. (It's late; I'm tired!) If /Film guy's take on the trailer adds to what Time magazine's guy said, then, yeah, I personally wouldn't object. The fact that the trailer's eight minutes long should probably go in there &mdash; that's much longer than most trailers and seems pretty pertinent.


 * I'll go see this, of course. But I'm really waiting for The Avengers! --Tenebrae (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hiya. Yeah, I loved X-Men First Class myself, although Young Adult was my own favorite movie last year. Ballsy to the max, and Theron and Patton should have gotten Oscar noms. (I say this having seen The Descendants, The Artist, and Hugo at least among the big awards movies.)


 * Not sure what "prologue's reveal of the trailer" means. Is the prologue itself the trailer? I might also think about quoting Sciretta directly and succinctly, the way you did the Time guy. Just my suggestions. I'm going to be signing off in a few mins. Pretty tired, and I probably indulged by Wiki-addiction a bit much today. Ah, well! --Tenebrae (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, J. It's a little effusive, and while other editors, of course, may have their own helpful suggestions, here is how I would do it: Peter Sciretta of /Film said the trailer had left him "impressed" and had captured a feeling of dark naturalism alongside Spider-Man's trademark wisecracking.

I think at this length it makes his points succinctly without giving him undue weight. Just my opinion. Our good colleagues TriiipleThreat and Darkwarriorblake, just to name a couple who edit Marvel film articles frequently, I'm sure could offer suggestions as well.

I'm incredibly impressed by the level of your collegiality and collaboration, BTW. I don't know what you do for a living, but if it involves working in a team setting with others, you're probably really, really good at it! --Tenebrae (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Elementary, my dear Henderson! : ) --Tenebrae (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I mean, personally I wouldn't remove viral-marketing references if someone adds them to an article, since they do factually exist. While I'm uncomfortable with what seems to me like crossing a line, I have a feeling that the consensus is to write about them, as Dark Knight Rises does (and in a pretty neutral, straightforward way, so I give it props for that). So there you go, my two cents' worth! Regards as always, Tenebrae (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * That's a really good idea, actually: It puts the campaign in a larger context, and it's that larger context that we're always striving for. I know when someone comes up with a better thought that I did! --Tenebrae (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dogpanting.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dogpanting.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Ben Templesmith, again
I apologize for asking, but can you offer your opinion on the latest round of the Ben Templesmith Photo Saga? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE  X  00:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice to members of WikiProject Comics that two discussions of interest are occurring at Talk:Comic Book Resources and Talk:Comics Bulletin. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ben Templesmith
I think it's pretty much resolved at this point. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

You are gracious as always...
...with the Spider-man film-series edit. It's funny ... I've gone back and reverted some of my own edits in various articles after saying to myself, "Boy, what me made me think that phrasing/fact read well/was pertinent?" So, my thanks for your very collegial understanding! With regards, your WPC colleague Tenebrae (talk) 19:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Ultimate Spider-Man
Thanks. That is much appreciated. Nightscream (talk) 18:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Spider-Man poster
Really got no idea why they are doing that. If it was me, I'd send them a disruptive editing warning. Always nice to be polite. Quentin X (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

WP Star Wars in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Star Wars for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Link
Well, it's not archived at Internet Archive, unfortunately. Pn the plus side, the Vancouver Sun rarely writes its own entertainment stuff &mdash; it usually syndicates (too often from the unreliable gossip site Bang Showbiz). From which article is this link? I can try and do a search for it on a non-Sun outlet. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * It wasn't this, was it? http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/Meet+Spidey+other+woman/5938503/story.html --Tenebrae (talk) 20:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Always happy to help. I'm especially always happy to help another good, responsible editor like yourself! There's a nice core bunch of us at WikiProject Comics, I am truly happy to say. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Anytime I can, absolutely. And thanks as always for the kind words. I tend to dread seeing the "You have messages" tag, and it's always a relief to hear from you or one of my other WikiProject colleagues. We're a very civilized and collegial group, by and large.


 * Myself, I'd love to tell everybody that it's Thanos, and I do in real life. I understand, though, that there's a larger issue at stake at The Avengers than just stating what seems obvious to comics fans. If we start making exceptions to OR because "fans know who it is and that should be enough," that's a really slippery slope. Fans of football teams, music figures, even politicians often "know" things that aren't true, and its only in retrospect that that's discovered. An encyclopedia by its nature needs to have concrete, final-word information as much as humanly possible, and if we say it's OK to use fan knowledge here, then others will want to use their own fan knowledge &mdash; accurate or not &mdash; in other topics' articles. And once Wikipedia starts making arbitrary exceptions, that's a slippery slope to ending the NOR policy that gives Wikipedia what limited credibility it has.


 * So, yeah, it's Thanos, as far as I'm concerned. But I could be wrong &mdash; they could call him something different, like Bruce Banner was David Banner in the 1970s' Hulk TV series &mdash; and I understand the need to hold my tongue because of the bigger picture and the larger concerns. That's my feeling, anyway. With regards, -- Tenebrae (talk) 19:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Nice digging! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what URLs you mean &mdash; I'm on deadline and probably not thinking straight about non-work-things at the moment &mdash; but point me to the exact page and what URLs you need and I'll look for them. Mostly I just right-click to obtain the link's url, and then fill in the field at Archive.org. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, there one for #s180-200: http://web.archive.org/web/20080603030121/http://www.wizarduniverse.com/051308top200characters.html  You can go there now and, in the box to the left of the "Go" button near the top of the page, paste the URL you want an archive of, hit Go, and see if there's one. There are multiple captures; usually the earliest ones are more likely to be no dead. (Whew &mdash; I'm so brain-burned after working all day, and a little more to go, I can barely use English!) --Tenebrae (talk) 21:56, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Did a right-click and and "save link location" or "copy link location," whatever it says. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Gotta admit, I'm kind of bushed myself. I swear, every time I have to interview somebody, I have to redo their Wikipedia page because so much of it's uncited or wrong. Hiddleston's was better than most, at least. I'll try to get back to this URL thing tomorrow. Where are you storing the archive URLs you found? --Tenebrae (talk) 00:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanos
Or possibly in an Empire audio podcast, though frankly I don't feel like hunting it down and listening to the entire thing to hear exactly what it says and to timestamp it. Anyway, I left a note on The Avengers movie talk page asking for other editors' comments. Annnnnd onward--! -- Tenebrae (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I did see that. And we need to go to the original source since, while not likely, it's possible this is a hoax audio. This kind of thing has happened on Wikipedia before, which is why we're so careful. If it's legit, there'll be an original page for it. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Denny seems about to vio 3RR at The Avengers (2012 film), and I'm don't want to vio 3RR myself. I've asked him several times to join the discussion, and he will not. Thought you might want to know. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * He seems to be talking on the talk page now, thank goodness. But join the discussion &mdash; it's actually gotten constructive and fellow editors are needed to help on an MCU consistency issue. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, so much for discussion. He's just made a 4th revert. I'll notify the 3RR board and let an admin make the call.--Tenebrae (talk) 01:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Web shooters pic
Technically, your pic doesn't really show the web shooters. They show the web and you can barely make out the shooters, so they wouldn't really meet the FUC criteria of being used to illustrate text. If there was an actual shot of the webshooters, maybe, but what particular image doesn't really show the device itself all to well.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I feel that it shows Peter intellect on creating it. I might just remove it though. We'll see. Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Archive link added. If you have a chance you might want to stop by The Avengers (2012 film) where a redlink editor is edit-warring. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm thinking that the pic doesn't qualify, because it's a basic picture of his chest logo, which we can see in other images. What would be good would be to get a picture of the graffiti around towns. That would be appropriate.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't have any place near where I am that has that graffiti. You can always check FlickR.com and see if someone has taken that picture and would be willing to release it to the public domain. Unless there is specific commentary on the image itself, and the image is needed (emphasis on "needed") to enhance the understanding, then it won't pass the criteria for fair use.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Although I haven't actually read the plot section yet or seen the film. :) --TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I meant to post this here not my own talk page, LOL.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks man. I am glad I done that. We don't need edit conflict when we have a idea to fix it. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  14:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

TriiipleT beat me to it! Bravo to both of you: two calm and mature Wikipedians who exemplify excellence and collaboration. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * This is a neutral notice of what may be a brewing edit war at The Avengers (2012 film) regarding the consensus comprise re: Thanos. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I see (through edit summaries) that someone has referenced the cosmic cube in the plot section. If it checks out maybe you can footnote it like the Thanos thing.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

WebCitation
I'l go have a look &mdash; sometimes it goes down on weekends. Archive.org is another one we can use. Also, and no spoiler involved, that' stuff going on with the opening line of The Avengers (2012 film) again, where, despite admin J Greb saying the lead was stable and shouldn't be edited without discussion, a couple of editors did so. That being the case, I've fleshed it out. I anticipate a hot zone there, and thought you might want a head's up. Goodness. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Seem to be back working again. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes. It. Was! I can't wait to see it again. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TASlogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:TASlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Spider-Man
A source you might find useful

http://collider.com/marc-webb-amazing-spider-man-interview-spider-man/163783/

and a new trailer

http://collider.com/the-amazing-spider-man-trailer/163457/

Which was pretty good because I really could not have cared less about this film, rebooting a series barely 5 years old, but god damn if that trailer doesn't make it look awesome and now I want to see it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure, tbh I didn't even know there was a viral campaign, lol, they aren't doing a good job with it. But yeah a Wanted poster would be OK, a photo of one of those real world graffiti would be pretty good too. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It would depend on what is actually on the poster. Like if it has any links to other stuff, especially other brands. Like the one at Prometheus for David I just said it was an example of viral marketing, so you could say "A Wanted poster for Spider-Man, posted in real world locations as part of the viral campaign". I'm assuming it was used in the real world though, I don't know. And the Graffiti pic looks good, I saw it just as you messaged me, good job finding it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah you could say "A viral Wanted poster for Spider-Man, used to promote the film at the 2012 WonderCon". I hate copyright, there are lots of great images out there for films, especially for premieres and they're locked away because of copyright. Or images from films which you have to justify to use at all because copyright says that your tiny screenshot from a film is harming someones profits somewhere. Copyright has done so much harm to the ability to share information and just general freedom (i.e. the music industry just got the Pirate Bay censored from the Internet in the UK and I am very much for the Internet being an uncensored, unfiltered resource that everyone should have access to.) Very good job finding it and getting them to release it though. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry guy, maybe the section will get bigger before release and there will be space for it.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

This is the MOS for images page, where it discusses the avoidance of putting text between two images (even uses the word "sandwich").  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  01:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Now I get what you mean. I originally intended it to be somewhere else but it goes below the section whenever I put it there. Still one image is enough...and that's all that matters.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  01:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Here's why it's not showing up in a Vancouver Sun search -- it's in the pay archive, which is a separate search function on the site (and hard to find). Here's the cite, which appears to be useable since it shows the quoted words from this Spider-Man article, and gives the date, headline, writer, etc. "Meet Spidey's other woman; Emma Stone plays Gwen Stacy - Spider-Man Peter Parker's first love ...verbally abusive father. "(Gwen) grew up on the Upper East Side (of New York), had a very stable family, a daddy's girl," she said. "Her father was the police chief. She's the oldest in her family (and) she has younger brothers... (998 words) Byline: Chris Lackner, Source: Postmedia News, Page: C5, Edition: Final $4.95 - Vancouver Sun - Tue Jan 3 2012"

The one issue is that it's dated Jan. 3, 2012, which is after the Dec. 2011 date of the MTV article quoting it. But this is about all I can do right now. I'll try later or in the meantime, happy hunting! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC) --Tenebrae (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks JH, means a lot after all the time I've put into that article. Keep on doing a good job over at Spider-Man. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Budget
Well. . . I dunno. It's clever, for sure. I see the mechanism of how that's a solution. And you've good good judgment. So as they used to say in Mad Men times, you've run it up the flagpole, now see if anyone salues! (BTW, I didn't put that figure in there; someone else put it in, and I just edited the sentence to make it clear it wasn't the filmmaker, some studio official or the trade press giving that figure.) --Tenebrae (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No, I didn't mean to sound discouraging &mdash; what you did was perfectly logical. I guess in writer terms, it's a good first draft.


 * Researching Rick Baker / MIB3 at the moment. I have an interview with him in one hour. Been spending the last four prepping! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mr krabs.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mr krabs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sandy cheeks.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sandy cheeks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gary the snail.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gary the snail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

X-Men
Of course you're right. It's probably just want he wants, to have me lose my temper. This person has been stalking and threatening me intermittently since March. He hates me, and that makes him obsessed. I've asked a couple of admins for help. And I do appreciate your appeal for calm. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Spidey
Yes, so long as there is commentary directly about the shooters. I haven't read the section, so I don't know what if any information there is about the shooters themselves, but there must be a discussion about their design. If there is, then the drawing is better than a screenshot, because its focus is on the building of the shooters and not on just showing the film.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Images should not melt into other sections. The more I read the quote from the quotebox, the more I think that it doesn't belong in that section. The Design section is about practical design elements, not what is influencing the film. I think that quote box needs to be moved (or removed). The quote is ok, but it shouldn't be in the Design section. When it's gone, the web-shooter picture can move up a little (aligned left). You can then move the next image to the right, then lower the image after that a bit and put that on the left. Lastly, re-align the final image to the right. There are so many visuals on the page that a lot of them are cramming into each other, so we need to avoid that as much as possible.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  22:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Webshootersfilm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Webshootersfilm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Screen Rant etc.
Hey, JH. Sure, I'll be glad to throw my two cents in. I'm on deadline at the moment, but I'll stop by the article later. Yeah, getting it to GA would be cool! --Tenebrae (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Of course. I have a few minutes now, so I'll give a quick look. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not wild about Bleeding Cool since it seems more like Rich Johnston's blog than a journalistic site, but he appears to be a professional journalist and he's occasionally quoted in mainstream sources as a comics reporter, so I, at least, am willing to be flexible on him. I can't speak for others, of course. All the news in Screen Rant (as opposed to reviews and such) come from other sources, such as The Hollywood Reporter, newspapers, etc., so I don't think it's even a question: We go to the original source that Screen Rant is lifting from. Same thing with Cinema Blend &mdash; although that site does seem to run what it says are original, one-on-one interviews, such as one with Brave director Mark Andrews, so I don't see why we couldn't use such interviews. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Those interviews certainly seem to me, offhand, to be one-on-ones; it'd be highly unusual for a star at a press conference to be eating his lunch on the dias, for example. I've just gotten my daily assignments so I have to jump off, but what you might want to do to be sure these are one-on-ones is to take some particularly idiosyncratic or unusual phrase from the interview, plug it into Google, and see if it turns up elsewhere.


 * As for the press release, we certainly do cite "XYZ Corporation press release via NewsWebsite.com", so I don't see why we couldn't do that here &mdash; although I would try to find the press release at the Sony corporate site first; at sites with the complete, verbatim press release second; and at an RS trade magazine reporting on the announcement third. Other Wikipedia editors might say go with the trade-magazine version first since a press release might be considered a primary source, but I don't hold with that: We have citation templates etc. for press releases, which I don't believe would still exist if press releases weren't kosher.


 * Anyway, I have to run. Hope I've been helpful. Got to admit, I'm surprised so many of the X-Men: First Class cites weren't archived. (Though I can see not archiving Box OFfice Mojo tlll after a film has completed its run, since the numbers frequently before that and any snapshot would be outdated in a day.) Cheers, mate! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, JH &mdash; sorry ... meant to let you know before I went in earlier today to edit X-MFC. Fortunately, we were in at separate times. And hell, I think we should shoot for FA! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * There's a link that's misdirecting at the Cast > Don Creech line. The ref name says "mtv" and it's going to the wrong article. If you change it to "mtv-easter" (or something), it'll go to the right article. But then the other links ref-named "mtv" have to be checked. I don't mind doing it, but I wanted to wait till you were done. Lemme know! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I just worked on the last section that needed citation formatting so you can go right on ahead. ;) Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, amigo! Done! Now I'm back to work....--Tenebrae (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

X-Men
You're welcome - given I even downloaded the Blu-Ray as a source (I purchased a DVD for the collection, but I still needed more extras for the Wiki!) it's the least I could do. Maybe I'll expand the critical reception later. But all I hope is that it's reviewed soon (for starters, it'll give me 60 points and motivation to clean up X-Men: The Last Stand and complete the set again - are you willing to help?). igordebraga ≠ 15:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Jump
Hey, JH. If you can find a way to say it that makes sense and seems notable, I sure wouldn't object. But I'm worried about being interpretive. To me, "jump off the page" means "don't just do what's in the script." I just don't know how we can take that phrase and say for sure absolutely what he meant by it. Then there's the other part: All actors have to be "in the moment," so I'm not sure it's notable for the director to be telling the cast that &mdash; it's like a baseball manager telling his team that when they're up to bat, "keep your eye on the ball."

I'd bet that with in the reams of articles written about this movie that there's a quote by Webb or one of the actors talking about Webb's philosophy toward how the actors would hit the right tone for the material.

Anyway, gotta run for a little bit ... deadlines.

Oh, I'm seeing the press screening in NY tomorrow. Hope the movie's good.... --Tenebrae (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Very good call on replacing those cites I'd removed. Guess I'd thrown out the baby with the bathwater, as they say.


 * RE "bring the charcter in the script to life" &mdash; I think that illustrates the issue we're having: Between the two of us we've come up with three interpretations of that line. I'm sure we can find something less confusing to replace it. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Kind of you to say. And again, I should have dropped a note to you first, since we you've been championing this article and really molding it to excellence. I mean that: I'm fixing some language and punctuation and such, but the information itself is so solid, and flows so well. I'll let you know when I'm out. With all regards, Tenebrae (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * This is exactly why we need editors! On it. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Seriously ... I usually charge for this kind of work! But I do love Wikipedia.


 * Deadlines are back (I've been justifying my Amazing Spider-Man work as story research), so I'm jumping off. Your turn. Have fun! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * No, the movie was OK, not great, but the studio people had become much nicer and more accommodating in the interim. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Haven't seen Incredible Hulk. Didn't like it as much as those other films, not the original Raimi version. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Daredevil
TBH I'm not sure, Elektra in comics at least seems to be her own thing, I haven't seen her have anything to do with Daredevil in years beyond being the reason he killed Bullseye. Also there seems to be some specifics for franchises like multimedia, i.e. I once moved Scream (film series) to Scream (franchise), but it was undone because it's largely just about the movies. The Elektra film obviously ties into Daredevil film, but I don't think that's enough to have an article about them if that is waht you mean. I think those kind of pages tend to have 3 films in them, i.e. someone made Harold & Kumar but there is no similar thing for the Crank films. You might list Elektra as a sequel or spin off on the Daredevil film page if it isn't already there, but personally I don't think those two films need a franchise page. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree Elektra is more of a spin-off but that doesn't necessarily preclude it from being in the same franchise. I really don't have a problem with them being listed separately or together. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I definitely get where you are coming from. The main reason I was for dividing the MCU is because there are smaller franchise within it like Iron Man and the MCU has its own template. Speaking of I was thinking it might be time to create Iron Man in film, if you want to help. I'll also ask the task force.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * JGreb can be a bit brash so don't take it personally. When I say it is a spin-off I'd still class them as related films with significant crossover, if that is what you are asking. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Elektra will be a part of the Daredevil franchise, same way Bullseye is. That's how whoever made the film was able to use them as they will have purchased the rights to those particular franchise characters. That's why Fox owns all the X-Men related stuff. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Spidey 3 poster
Actually, only one Spidey film has domestic poster so I wanted another one to have the same. I am very sorry. I didn't tried to be disruptive.--Plea$ant 1623 10:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I obey rules of Wikipedia, except for this one.--Plea$ant 1623 10:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Amazing Spider-Man theatrical poster2.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading File:The Amazing Spider-Man theatrical poster2.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. I appreciate it. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  23:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Spidey
If their official website is listing it then it's fine. I would just put "Europe" though in the infobox, because it would be a pain to list out Germany, Austria, and Switzerland for 1 date. So, I'd have "Europe" and "United States", and then in the body of the article explain that "Europe" are those 3 countries.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Being a production designer doesn't make him notable to be mentioned on the page soley for that reason, nor does his death (unless he died making the movie). The production section should not be used to just list production crew members. IMDb can list people. Our page should be used to expand and provide information about the film making process to readers.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  22:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * As I have said before that's what I figured. ;) Jhenderson  7 7 7  22:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Upon checking, your comment was within his bogus edit war warning, which I removed entirely. It was not meant as a slight against you. Just removing the entire section. As for that image. I just reverted it because it did not match the source that was being used. Overall, it's probably not worth fighing for, but at the moment it was a copyright issue because the source being used was not that image.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Limited release is still a release, so if that was the first official time that it was released to the public (not to just critics, but people could buy a ticket and see it in select theaters), then that should be the first date on the release.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Whichever the date was for the source you recently provided.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  03:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Technically, yes premieres should be listed if they are THE first one.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Spidey album
That will be a great idea, dude!--Plea$ant 1623 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Spider-Man 3
Hi, J. If you want, you might keep an eye on Spider-Man 3, where someone is removing tags. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Norman Osborn
Thanks LOL, I didn't know he was going to be in the movie. I'll take a look into it after I see it on the 3rd.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, JH. Oh, Lordy. Osborn's mentioned by name a couple of times, but there's no indication WHO that is in Connors' cell at the end of the movie. Unlike Thanos, I can't even imagine why anyone would assume that was Osborn. On deadline now, but I'll check on that in a bit.--Tenebrae (talk) 20:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ozai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ozai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ozai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 13:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 13:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

The Amazing Spider-Man poster
I updated it--Plea$ant 1623 18:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, thanks. I managed to get the shorter version.--Plea$ant 1623 15:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

The Amazing Spider-Man Post-Credit Scene
Hello,

Here is a reliable source for the post-credits scene, http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1689023/amazing-spider-man-post-credits.jhtml, You may be wondering why I didn't add this myself. Well, the answer is :I didn't watch the movie yet, I am going to watch it either today or tomorrow--I don't want any spoilers. I didn't read the article but I guess it would be enlightening with the recent uncertainty in the post-credit scenes. --Eddyghazaley (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, it's not post-credits. It's in the middle of the credits. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Plot
Two of us have asked for semi-protection, both Eddyghazaley. Don't know why it's taking so long when the requests above and below were addressed. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Aw, geez, JH! I didn't know it was you! Honest!   : (    I hadn't even looked at who the last editor was. Collegially yours, as always, to a fine colleague. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Yea, I was checking that link quite a few times. They have been responding to the newer requests and our request still remains "untouched"--Eddyghazaley (talk) 15:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You're requests were declined. Oh well! Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * If it gets really bad, we could ask one of the admins familiar with WikiProject Comics directly, I guess.


 * JH: I'll keep an eye on the plot. You just relax and go see the movie! (Me, I want to see Ted!) --Tenebrae (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I liked Scott Pilgrim a hell of a lot, and gave it a great review in a fairly major publication, so I agree it's a pretty good and vastly underrated movie. Not sure what the question was, though. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Just saw your update. Hmm. Good question. It seems a little early to put it on any top-10 lists without it passing the test of time. On the other hand, Newsarama is a reliable comics-specialty publication, so it's opinion is certainly informed. I guess I'll sit out this one &mdash; whatever other editors decide either way is fine by me. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I'd say in the note. It's much more in context that way. For the non-comics-fan, that's the clearer place.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

You bet! '"And"' a good movie! --Tenebrae (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Indeed. I know for a fact people make stuff up that appears in Ain't It Cool News. Stuff that Harry Knowles himself writes and bylines I think is reliable. But all the other stuff by anonymous writers isn't encyclopedia-quality sourcing. One of my rules of thumb: If it's not a good enough source for a college paper, it's not a good enough source for an encyclopedia!  ; )   --Tenebrae (talk) 18:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Box Office Section
I will look at the articles tomorrow, I read them, but I will see what is relevant and not. I'm sure you can see that the Box Office Section has already been downsized. So, I doubt if my efforts to expand that section will pay off, either way I will love to do it.

The movie was absolutely terrific with a balance of emotion, action, and suspense. You ought to watch it soon --Eddyghazaley (talk) 20:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring
You are receiving this message as you have recently been involved in uploading versions of File:The Amazing Spider-Man (film) poster.jpg. Please see my comments here. I have protected the image, as the backing-and-forthing is not acceptable- instead, the alternatives should be discussed, and a consensus reached. Continuing to edit war in any way may result in a block. Thank you, J Milburn (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I am the one who contacted and recommended you that so I totally agree with that. I am not involved with the latest edit warring and am only involved with the upload of the first image. Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Copy edit
Hi, can you check the grammar of the details I've added on The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film)? It just that I am not confident on my grammar. Thanks--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Avengers
Well, the official title IS Marvel's The Avengers. But the question is whether to use the full formal name or the common name. The list does seem to already include the new formal title Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope rather than just Star Wars, the name it had had for decades. I'm not bothered by it, really. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Response
Its fine(I do that sometimes)...Yeah, I agree.--Eddyghazaley (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

I usually report when actuals come out. But, don't let this stop you from adding information, although I don't think a lot can be added anymore. A simple report of its North American second weekend and maybe third, then that is it. Internationally, we can add the third weekend gross. The highest-grossing territory will be added, which in this case is South Korea. If in the long-run it breaks any other records, they will be added.--Eddyghazaley (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel dc-1-.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Marvel dc-1-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Spider-man video
Just letting you know I forgot to do this. sorry, have been busy. Have remembered now so will try to get it done. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * K How about something like this? If its not what you want let me know. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

TDKR
I did, as did my young-adult son, though we liked the second one more. And as much as we liked TDKR, I guess we're both Marvel guys &mdash; we liked The Avengers more. But, yes, a good movie and well worth seeing. What performances, direction and cinematography, and what a serious-minded, well-constructed story.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thought it was pap, completely and utterly disappointed. And that's just overall, the plot has more holes in it than Gotham did after all that damage. And this is from someone who will consume anything Batman. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Straw poll
You previously contributed to this discussion and now there is a straw poll being conducted. Please make your vote clearly so numbers do not need to be interpreted. Thank you Kurt Parker (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

ASM
Hi, JH. Glad to try and help, and to take a look. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty good at condensing without losing pertinent information; it just seems like a really big job. But I guess since I can, I should &mdash; I'll just do it in bits and pieces.


 * Haven't looked at the theme section, but in general terms the advice is certainly sound. Guess we got us a project! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Layout issues
Your flags seem to be positioned a little oddly. The American flag on your userpage starts at the middle of the "W" of Wikipedia, while the flag on your talk page starts exactly at the beginning of the "W". Both images appear to be positioned to overlap with the Wikipedia logo by (about half of the bottom-most puzzle pieces), though one is on top of and the other under the logo. Not sure if these are intentional or glitches, but thought I'd point them out. BTW - I'm using the Vector skin and Chrome 20.0.1132. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I am the first to admit that I need remodeling on my pages. Although I don't see that as a problem for I don't think they both need to be alike to each other. If you can align them perfectly then you can fix it though. I welcome anybody to contribute on my page. Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, I thought it might be some kind of glitch with Chrome. I'll leave the alignment for someone artistic - simply aligning the flags on my old user page was frustrating enough.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SWOTB.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:SWOTB.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:StarWarsTrilogyCover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:StarWarsTrilogyCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome
Aside from the fact that your edits were really very good, I've been having a lot of fun lately with the number 777. A year and a half ago my birthday cake said 7*7+7 (that's 56) and last year it said 111 base 7 (57). (Next year it will be 0 modulo 29). Over the past year I've been photographing numerous houses and post offices with the numbers 777. So I just can't help being the nice guy.--WickerGuy (talk) 21:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Breaking Dawn
Ok so if that's not how you move stuff, could you move it for me? And if so, revert the edit I made to the Breaking Dawn - Part 1 bc that one I removed all the duplicate 'Part 2' stuff. Thanks :) xx Lady Lotus (talk) 18:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice
There is a discussion involving WikiProject Comics at Reliable sources/Noticeboard that may be of interest to you. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NeoMatrix2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:NeoMatrix2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Dying Wish
The ending of 50-years of continuous publishing of The Amazing Spider-Man and starting The Superior Spider-Man establishes real world notability for the new Dying Wish article. Please help me expand it. Thank you!! Spidey 104  01:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sidenote: I do agree with you about Sha Shan, Max Modell, etc.

Neutral notice
As a veteran WikiProject Comics editor, you're invited to a discussion at Talk:Marvel ReEvolution. --Tenebrae (talk) 10:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

ASM
I'll be glad to help, probably over the weekend. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually, while I'm here, you might want to weigh in at discussions at Talk:Wolverine (character) and Talk:Watchmen. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed revision of disambiguation terms at WP:NCCOMICS
As you recently participated in this discussion, Do you have anything to add at this discussion? --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion at this RfC and the various sections that followed it, the latest being "This discussion". Since there are four sections so far, very spread out, I am clarifying that the topics are whether we open with Publication history, and whether citation format should be consistent. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Amazing Spider-Man
I've started the review for The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film), and would like your thoughts on a few things. Overall it looks strong and ripe for promotion--thanks for your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Watchmen
I know. It's as crazy and as small as the cap I / lowercase i debate at Star Trek Into Darkness.


 * User:Wrath X made edits to Watchmen on March 20 and 21. I copy-edited his edits, removed some ELNOs and the like and reorganized a little, but basically kept his material. I then saw differing citation formats and, more importantly, loads of dead links. I a) found archive links or substituted live links for the dead ones, and b) made the cite formatting consistent. I also added a Publication history, since the article had buried it in a "Release and reception section" midway through the article.


 * User:Indopug summarily reverted two editors &mdash; Wraith X and myself &mdash; which included restoring all the dead links, removing the Publication history, and restoring the few instances of poor grammar / syntax that I had copy-edited. Then I think it just became a pissing contest, since a lot of the discussion has been, in my opinion, odd.


 * My feeling, in a nutshell: We follow MOS to begin with a PH since it's logical to begin with what something is before going on to how something came to be. Articles with characters having long, complicated publication histories generally have a separate article like List of Spider-Man comics that we do a main-article link to under the PH heading. Characters with simpler histories, like Nick Fury and Watchmen have a self-contained PH giving that information.


 * Believe it or not, that's it: Having a PH, having non-dead and consistently formatted links, and not having poor grammar/syntax. That's the argument. I'm astonished. If you go the top where the TfC template is, you'll see the diffs. Oy. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Spider-Maneffects.ogg)
Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Maneffects.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Webshootersfilm.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Webshootersfilm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

IM3
The Hollywood Reporter liked it, so I may be in the minority here. But it's by far the weakest of the three, in my opinion. Playboy scientist Stark, without his armor, suddenly has the skills to break into a heavily guarded compound and to engage expertly in a 1980s-style Lethal Weapon shoot-out. There's a weird partnership with a 10-year-old kid that just feels off, especially since the kid mentions his waitress mom and a sister we never see &mdash; and given what the kid does for him, Stark eventually rewards him with some nice toys but still lets the family live in a shithole. What kind of dick does that? There's slo a major plot hole I'll talk about after you see the movie. And the post-credits scene makes Banner come off like a total douche. On the plus side, there are some great quips throughout, and Paltrow and Pearce in particular are at the top of their game. I'm sure a lot of people will see it out of curiosity but, really, it's not a great movie. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * And, hey, it's got 95% positive on Rotten Tomatoes right now, so I may be really, really off on this one and people might love it! I will say the other feature writers at the screening with me weren't very taken with it, but maybe we're just jaded.! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Mysterio merge proposal
Since January there has been a proposal to merge Mysterio (Francis Klum) into Mysterio. So far there have been only two comments, so I don't want to close the debate until a few more people chime in. You have always shown yourself to be a level-headed editor, so please post your opinion. Thank you. Spidey 104  13:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Article Incubator/Bulma
Article Incubator/Bulma, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Miscellany for deletion/Group of stale articles from Article Incubator and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Article Incubator/Bulma during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Illia Connell (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

IM3
Hi, J. Either version of the Flash thing works for me. Also, I don't write for Deadline, so I can't be much help there! : )  &mdash;Tenebrae (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * If it's all the same, I'd rather not say specifically -- being a reporter / feature writer makes you sort of a target, and I'd hate to add Wikipedia craziness to the mix! Primarily I write for a major metropolitan newspaper and freelance for magazines; I've also written several books. It's ironic that I normally get paid very well for research, editing and writing and yet do it here for free, but it's a hobby and I enjoy it. I think it stems from the same impulse that led me to journalism: a desire to help set an accurate record. And I also do feel like I'm part of a good group of colleagues here with fellow editors like yourself, Triiiple Threat, Darkwarriorblake, J Greb, and at least 10 others who do such good work it's a little humbling. I appreciate and respect my colleagues very much. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Equus (comics)
Thank you, that's very considerate of you. (And thank you for the compliment as well.) Yes, I put a lot of work into the article, and it does have at least one secondary source (I think you meant to say that it was mostly primary sources), and having it as an article gives more information to the reader, so yeah, if you could unmerge it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks again. :-) Nightscream (talk) 21:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I know. I had been trying to find other secondary sources to bolster it, but now with The New 52, I don't even know if he's appeared in that current continuity. I was a bit more green back then on notability, and this is why I tended to not create many new articles. I still don't, but now when I do, I make sure that there are at last a few reliable secondaries in it. Nightscream (talk) 23:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually, I have no particular feelings about the character. It was more a matter of noticing that a character that played an important part as an antagonist in a notable Superman storyline didn't have an article, and wanting to create it. Nightscream (talk) 01:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Article Incubator/Bulma
Article Incubator/Bulma, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bulma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Article Incubator/Bulma during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Illia Connell (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Article Incubator/Deadpool (film)
Article Incubator/Deadpool (film), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Deadpool (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Article Incubator/Deadpool (film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Illia Connell (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Just saw this, maybe you can WP:USERFY it until the project picks up steam.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558981079 your edit] to Lara (comics) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Restoring character articles...
While I can appreciate the un-merging of some of the DC character, there is a problem with what you are doing.

Stating "While I do agree this is badly written and lacks sources." and then not fixing the deficiencies doesn't help. If you want to work at upgrading the articles:

(And keep in mind here: I AM a fan of the comics and the general Superman mythos. Some of what's to come may make that seem unlikely.)
 * Fix the writing style if it is poorly written.
 * Add material from secondary (not the comics, shows, and films), third party (not DC, Warner Brothers, etc) sources that discuss the characters in a real world context. Such as "Sam Lane was re-worked by Writer A to provide commentary on the military and later by Writer B to comment on military paranoia." or "Lara as a character has been used to show themes of..."
 * Verbally describing the character or only providing a fictography (which is almost all these articles do) is anantima to the intents of Wikipedia.
 * The same is true of "In other media" sections that provide the show and actor as a short one line and then launch in to extended synopsis of the individual episodes or, worse, films.
 * A lot of these articles don't meet GNG - Even if Lara is Superman's biological mother, she doesn't get a lot of notice outside of the stories. The primary sources themselves are not enough to satisfy general notability.
 * A lot of the Superman characters also have these problems - even those that should pass GNG easily and have enough secondary sources to not be 100% plot dumps. Take a look at Jimmy Olsen, Perry White, Jor-El, and the Kents. Frankly that does chafe a lot more than the overblown fictographies of characters farther down the pecking order being revived just so we "have" them. But not by much.

- J Greb (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Second opinion regarding Spider-Man (1977 film) in navbox.
As you are an experienced editor when it comes to navboxes and comic book articles, I would appreciate your input regarding the inclusion of Spider-Man (1977 film) in Template:Marvel Comics films‎ at Template talk:Marvel Comics films‎. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Deadpool film userfied
Hi Jhenderson777, just wanted to let you know I've userfied an article from the incubator per your request. It's now available at User:Jhenderson777/Deadpool (film). I didn't leave a redirect from the Incubator, so you needn't worry about requesting speedy deletion there. Good luck. --BDD (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Batman.
I didn't make it clear in the edit. But I didn't revert J Greb but I actually did something different. Jhenderson 7 7 7  23:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I was actually trying to make a compromise.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  23:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for starting the discussion. - jc37 00:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * What do you think of Joe Chill being on the unhidden portion. Honestly it would be much easier to find sources to Hugo Strange than Joe Chill. Jhenderson  7 7 7  23:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. But it's also worth discussing. - jc37 00:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

personal discussion
I have added more conversations on the navbox discussion page. I thank you for being civil with me and working with me. Also (out of curiosity and being friendly) is Batman you're favorite superhero? Jhenderson 7 7 7  01:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * No worries : )
 * And I think it would be difficult for me to pick a "favourite" hero (I enjoy story and characterisation, amongst other things, so for me I think it probably wouldn't be about picking isolated characters), though if I tried, I dunno if batman would be #1. I have a vague recollection of being asked this in the past, but no idea what my answer was then. - jc37 06:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

The Mentalist
The source identifies the character as a nemesis. The article requires more than that, it requires an archnemesis. Edward321 (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Three items

 * Thank you for your edits so far on vastly improving the (now moved) Norman Osborn and Green Goblin articles!!
 * A new article that was just started today that you might be able to also significantly improve (if you have time and the resources) is Venom vs. Carnage.
 * Recently a Spider-Man (set index) article was started, probably because of the now-former Green Goblin (set index) article. If you could comment on its deletion discussion it would be appreciated. Spidey  104  00:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm fine with removing this information because it was more detailed than necessary for that page, but thank you for keeping them in the "Associated Goblins" section. Demogoblin and Hobgoblin are much more important/notable than David Lowell, so they should be in that section instead of relegated to the (almost forgotten) "See also" section. I'll wait to see what your plans are before I do anything, but there should be at least a sentence or two about those characters. Spidey  104  13:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The Goblin (Marvel Comics) article sounds like a great idea! If you start a userpage or something to work on it before making it a full article let me know where it is so I can help with the initial construction. Spidey  104  12:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Marvel Database
Hey there! I just wanted to thank you again for preparing a page on the Marvel Database. I think it looks great and was wondering what the next step would be in the process of making a full article from it. Thank you again for all of your help and please don't hesitate to let ask if there is anything I can do. Jamie (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Cookie
Thanks for the cookie, I guess. Haleth (talk) 02:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Arch
Yeah, the whole thing has really become fancruft. Having to go in after one overly ambitious editor and fact-check all his citations is a time-consuming chore, and leaving everything up unchallenged is bad for the overall mission of Wikipedia: More and more, unfortunately, I'm finding that time-pressed reporters at even major publications are going to Wikipedia and taking what's written here &mdash; even non-footnoted claims! &mdash; as fact. The danger then is that future editors use those publications to cite that uncited material ... a feedback loop of mirrored misinformation.

Maybe the thing to do with the archenemies page is to put it up for deletion because the criteria for the list is problematically vague. Then two things would happen: It'd get deleted, which solves any problems, or we'd get a constructive discussion on establishing criteria and safeguarding against WP:UNDUE and WP:FRINGE. I would support a deletion discussion if this option were to be taken. Because right now, this is one WP:OWN-y editor's fan page.--Tenebrae (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580977757 your edit] to List of multimedia franchises may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Dust to Dust || no || Blade Runner (1982) || no || None officially although a show loosely based on it and [[We Can Remember It for You

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=581543720 your edit] to List of multimedia franchises may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * |Lilo & Stitch Chris Sanders and Dean DeBlois || ||  || ''Lilo & Stitch'

Nomination of Critical response to the Harry Potter films for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Critical response to the Harry Potter films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Critical response to the Harry Potter films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Dream out loud (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

PDF archiving
Should be archivable &mdash; I've archived PDFs. What's not really archivable are Flash sites &mdash; you usually can archive the frame, but no content. Always good to her from you JH! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Peggy Carter
If you can find enough reliable third party sources to warrant an article, go for it!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Done. Hope you find what I did helpful. Nightscream (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peggy Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

TriiipleThreat (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
And a happy holiday and a merry Christmas to you, too, my terrific colleague! With great regards, Tenebrae (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration
Another admin has opened an Arbitration case in which he is trying to have me de-sysopped, because he feels I've misused my admin tools, due to two recent errors I've made: one of which I made as an admin (due to my understanding of WP:INVOLVED, which as it is being explained to me, not in accordance with the rest of the community's), and another in which I reverted an article because I mistakenly thought the previous edit dispute had been resolved. Happy Holidays :-) Nightscream (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

TreCoolGuy is at ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> 19:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Same to you, buddy! Happy New Year. Nightscream (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year
No, no, all good. I was editing a New York City-related article since it pertained to work today &mdash; yes, I had to work today; yesterday, too ... deadlines never end &mdash; and then took a break. Happy New Year, buddy! --Tenebrae (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

List of Spider-Man villains
Your version is fantastic! What an incredible amount of work and detail you've put it! My hat is off to you, man!

I certainly do like Marvel Chronicles and have cited it from time to time. Peter Sanderson absolutely knows his stuff.

Not sure what "unbare citations" means. But from even just a glance at your sandbox version, I can't imagine how it could be cited any better than you've done. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see what you mean. Those cites are the work of another good editor, User:Mtminchi08, and are basically "ibid." cites referencing a book that was given a full citation in its first footnoted mention; it looks like you ported these over from other articles that would have had the full cite given earlier.


 * I would say there are two, possibly three, ways of addressing this. The simplest would be to turn the first footnote into a full mention. The more involved way would be to have a bulleted list of books used for reference cites; this list is generally placed in a section called "References." However, then what's called "References" now would become "Footnotes," which would be confusing here since there's a separate "Notes" section. I think we can also simply keep the footnotes in the "Reference" section and below them add, in the same section, a bulleted list of books that the footnotes cite. You might want to check the MOS on that.


 * For me, the first way is simplest and I myself like keeping everything together rather than separating them, but I can see how other editors would prefer it other ways. Good luck! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * No, no &mdash; didn't mean to imply "cheating" ... I often port good cites from one article to another. No use doing twice the work for the same result! --Tenebrae (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Peggy Carter
Hey I just want to get your feelings about the infobox image of Peggy Carter. Something about it just doesn't sit right with me. Its not a MOS issue just a personal one. I feel an older image of Peggy would probably fit better with the article as she is more of a historical character that only with the release of CA:TFA has renewed interest brought her back out in comics. I have a scanned issue of Tales of Suspense #77 (1966), which shows her time in French Resistance during WWII, but as with older comics the detail isn't that great and there are only interior panels with dialogue boxes for use. Still the artwork is good and as I said before may feel lend a feeling of antiquity to the article. What do you think?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * What I meant was something like these;, , . They are older images that show her during WWII. I wish they were digital scans though.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * So you're okay with the second image then? There all from Tales of Suspense #77 (1966), Peggy's second appearance. If only I had a subscription to Marvel Unlimited I could get a digital version.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * She was introduced in Tales of Suspense #75 (1966), which I have a scan of as well. But that issue takes place in the "modern day"; Cap bumps into her on the street but they only vaguely recognize each other and she is attacked by Bartoc while trying to get a cylinder to S.H.I.E.L.D.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Wow this is interesting, the article is wrong. Tales of Suspense #77 is Peggy's first appearance. The woman Cap meets on the street is Sharon (although unnamed), he vaguely recognizes her because she looks like Peggy (who would older by then), which leads to Cap reminiscing about Peggy in the story that takes place in Tales of Suspense #77.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, there is a character who goes by the name Agent 13 (Sharon's codename) in Captain America #1 (1941). It should be noted that this character is a brunette where as Peggy was blonde like Sharon. Also another character named Agent 13 appears in Tales from Suspense #65 (1965). This website believes it is Golden Girl and that Stan Lee just liked using name Agent 13. I think we can disprove #75 as her first appearance and that #77 is earliest definitive appearance.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, guys. Been asked to give my two cents. This image was mentioned in the posts above, and I'd be tempted to use a cropped headshot, cutting off the tip of the word balloon. However, the current image is full-body, which is important. On the other hand, her features seem generic in that full-body shot (a failing of too many current comics artists &mdash; so many of their characters look alike). I'm good with whatever you guys come up with &mdash; you both know your stuff. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Thor in film
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thor in film, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Captain America in film
An article that you have been involved in editing, Captain America in film, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Iron Man in film
An article that you have been involved in editing, Iron Man in film, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Hulk in film
An article that you have been involved in editing, Hulk in film, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Al Plastino
This is a neutral notice to a WikiProject Comics member of a discussion at Talk:Al Plastino and an edit-war over fringe science and family/friend editing of Al Plastino. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For having quite possibly the most interesting userpage editnotice I've ever seen.

APerson (talk!) 02:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Scorn (Marvel Comics)
You previously had merged Scorn (Marvel Comics) to the Symbiote (comics) article. That has been reverted and I just opened a discussion to have it merged back so there is a conversation in case someone tries to unmerge it again in the future. Spidey 104  02:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Can you please post a comment? So far no one has and despite the discussion being open for 9 days I don't feel comfortable closing it with no one else commenting. Thanks. Spidey  104  19:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For having quite possibly the most interesting userpage editnotice I've ever seen.

APerson (talk!) 02:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Scorn (Marvel Comics)
You previously had merged Scorn (Marvel Comics) to the Symbiote (comics) article. That has been reverted and I just opened a discussion to have it merged back so there is a conversation in case someone tries to unmerge it again in the future. Spidey 104  02:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Can you please post a comment? So far no one has and despite the discussion being open for 9 days I don't feel comfortable closing it with no one else commenting. Thanks. Spidey  104  19:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Animated films work group
Hey, could you possibly help me with a minor problem? I noticed that you created a soft redirect a few years ago, for the Comic book films task force:. Did this task force ever exist as a work group of WikiProject Comics? If so, I would like to make similar modifications to the Animated films work group. Recently, the parameter Animated was added to the WikiProject Film template, in order to include articles in this work group. I have started to add the parameter to talk pages, however the articles are not being added to the project with the proper classification, since the Film project does not use the importance parameter. Therefore, they are showing up on the assessment table for animated films as "Other". I understand that this is unique, because it's technically a work group of the Animation project, but none of the other Film task forces use importance. If the work group can become a film task force, I think that would solve the problem.

Otherwise, if an article has both the WikiProject Animation and WikiProject Film banners, the table should ideally reflect the value of the film-importance parameter on the Animation banner. In that case, I wonder if a script can be added to modify the display of the table, something that would make film articles default to the value of film-importance, if present on the WikiProject Animation template, and default to "NA" if the parameter is not present. Any thoughts? Fortdj33 (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Marvel Database
Hey Jhenderson777,

I realize it has been a while, but I am wondering if your offer to create a page for the Marvel Database still stands. If so, please let me know if there is anything you need from me. I think the page you made last year is fine. In addition to the references you already cited, we've since been covered by Salon.com, as well, if that helps any. Thanks so much for all your help!

--Jamie (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles
You want articles, sources? Here's two:

http://www.vulture.com/2013/07/history-batman-and-superman-through-the-years.html

http://sequart.org/magazine/16835/bromancing-the-extracurricular-partnership-and-relationship-of-batman-and-superman/

The crossover word is used in one article, yes. But read the whole thing and put it into perspective, 50 to 60 years ago, Batman and Superman teaming up or guest starring in each other's solo books was definitely a novel idea. And then you have story arcs like Death in the Family or the recent Hush arc, which have made it abundantly clear that they are more involved in each other's lives beyond League business, the occasional crossover event or a book series specifically for their teamup which you would still term as a crossover. They simply have too long of a history working and interacting with each other outside of the Justice League for their recurring partnership to be as infrequent or out of the ordinary as crossovers by nature are.

http://www.sellmycomicbooks.com/batman-villains-list.html

And here's a comic book seller and valuer's website which specificially lists Deathstroke as a Batman family villain, in spite of his debut as a Teen Titans villain. Even if you feel that Deathstroke is more of a bitter enemy of Dick Grayson's, that should be enough to warrant his inclusion in the template. Haleth (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The last one isn't a reliable source. Not even close. The first two are but it's not specifically proving that they belong in a supporting character section of a navbox too. Jhenderson  7 7 7  16:55, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Same thing as months ago
Well, I said it was good to be back, and I appreciated the kind words from you and other editors. But now the same editor who drove me away before with his repeated "fuck offs" and the admin who says it's OK to tell other editors to fuck off are it again. I was minding my own business, not even thinking about that foulmouthed person, and just trying to put it behind me. But within days of my return he's on my talk page, poking me a stick. And the admin is saying, literally, that if I don't like being told "fuck off" that all my past good work means nothing and that I should leave Wikipedia.

I don't know what my future is here. I've started an ANI here, and hopefully something will come of that. I just wanted to let some of the good and responsible editors here know, and that if they're interested in following what's going on, that's the link. I am disheartened as hell. --Tenebrae (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chewbacca-2-.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Chewbacca-2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Momo (Avatar: The Last Airbender) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Momo (Avatar: The Last Airbender) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Momo (Avatar: The Last Airbender) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  21:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VenomSpider-Man.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:VenomSpider-Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man storyline list
I saw your comment when editing the Spider-Man template and I thought you had a good point about there being a need for an article for them. I have started an article for that, but I am keeping it as a user draft page for now because it's not up to standards for being a list article. It is currently here: User:Spidey104/List of Spider-Man storylines. Please make any additions/changes you think are necessary to the list article. Once it is up to a better quality I can move it to be a full Wikipedia article. So far I have created the list from the storylines that were in the category, but I did not include storylines that weren't strictly a Spider-Man story, such as Secret Wars and Shadowland. Spidey 104  15:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Spider-Man enemies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolverine (comics). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your work on expanding P.T., I created the article with the intention of expanding it myself but never had the time to do so. I can tell you put a lot of effort into the expansion and as others have said it's now even more notable than Silent Hills itself. TJD2 (talk) 03:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm sure!
Hi Jhenderson777,

Concerning the P.T. bit I took out, I'm sure that GameSpew isn't notable right now. It's not mentioned on WP:VG/RS, the IP editor added GameSpew reviews to a couple of other articles and just for kicks I looked up its Alexa rank. And thanks for cleaning up after me! Kind regards, --Soetermans. T / C 09:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

GAN
With all due respect, I think it's too early for a GAN for P.T. There's still a plot section to add and a few more details that will probably take another week or two. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 21:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Second opinion on grammar question: Talk:List of nuclear reactors
Hi Jhenderson777,

I posted a section to Talk:List of nuclear reactors about how to correct grammatical issues on that page, and I am looking for more input on whether the page should be changed according to my suggestions. As a copy editor, do you have anything to say about it?

Thanks! Mechanic1c (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spider-Man webslinger.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Man webslinger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

About two of the villains from the original "List of Spider-Man enemies"
I don't think that the Gentleman and the Disk Jockey, two of the villains that were on the original List of Spider-Man enemies, should be re-added. The reason why is because I think the list should be limited to characters from the comics. The Gentleman and the Disk Jockey have never appeared in the comics; both characters are actually from a series of Spider-Man novels (even though the Gentleman is a relative of a villain from the comics and has appeared in recent Spider-Man films). I created a new section for the List of Spider-Man enemies in other media article devoted to villains that are introduced in novels, radio programs and theatre productions/stage plays. Darkknight2149 (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of P.T. (demo)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article P.T. (demo) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC),

Opportunity
After reading you comment. I would like to learn how to become a better user on Wikipedia. - User:TreCoolGuy

Avengers Studio
I started a talk page on the 2012 in film page. About why Marvel Studios should be just credited for it not Disney. -- TreCoolGuy (talk) 1:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Avengers/Iron Man 3
Hello, I started a talk page discussion on the list of Paramount Pictures films page. About adding Avengers and Iron man 3 to the page. Thanks for reading this message and have a good day. – TreCoolGuy (talk) 3, March 2014 (UTC)

FOX Animated Universe
I have started a discussion on the talk page for the FOX Animated Universe to keep it. You can find the discussion right here. Thanks and have a good day. - TreCoolGuy (talk) 09 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of P.T. (demo)
The article P.T. (demo) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:P.T. (demo) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 06:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

July Spider-Man work
All of your edits yesterday and today on Spider-Man: WOW!! THANK YOU for all that you did. That was some serious improvement! Spidey 104  17:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Wizard
Happy to help, Jh. Here are archive links for #61-70, #71-80, and #191-200 to start off with. There are links at the bottom of these pages for other numbers, and if you click around these archive pages you should be able to accumulated the rest. Happy hunting!

While I have you, perhaps I could ask you to go to the RfC at Talk:The Phantom and weigh in there. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, let's gather as many as we can. The pattern seems to be that in the original URLs, the fourth number from the left after ".com" and the seventh number from the left after ".com" each go up one in tandem, and that each time they do so, they do it in a pair of URLs, one ending in "thgreatestcharacters.html" and the other ending in "thgreatestcharacters2.html." So "0514082" goes up to "0515083" and "0516084" etc. The URL for #181-190 seems an exception, and sometimes one or the other number goes up by two when the other goes up by one, and in the lower character numbers (below #40), it looks like the fifth character from the left goes up. After that, I can't quite figure out the pattern. Still, here's everything so far from #21-on:


 * #181-190
 * #171-180
 * #161-170
 * #151-160
 * #141-150
 * #131-140
 * #121-130
 * #111-120
 * #101-110
 * #91-100
 * #81-90; #61-80 are in previous post
 * #51-60
 * #41-50
 * #31-40
 * #21-30
 * --Tenebrae (talk) 01:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * So I did a Google search for [wizard "THE 200 GREATEST COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS OF ALL TIME" "20."], hoping it would get me a dead original link for whoever character #20 was, and I got a hit. (It was Ultron, by the way.) Doing an archive search on that gave me, ironically, #1-10 but not yet #11-20. I'm working on it.


 * #2-10
 * #1, and boy, was it a wrong choice. But each to one's own. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Whoops &mdash; didn't read your full post till now. I can't remember how I found the first one, though I imagine it was by running across an old Wikipedia footnote with the original URL and then searching for it at archive.org. Or, no, wait &mdash; now II'm jogging my memory, I may have found the original URL at an old forum posting online. Sometimes you get lucky with these old links. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

GameSpot Issue fixed
Hey, just to let you know, you can archive those GameSpot refs with complete safety now on both Archive.org and WebCite. But old archived links done during the time of the problem still suffer from that issue, so fresh archiving is needed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Midtown High School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midtown High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Midtown High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Мандичка YO 😜 01:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Midtown High School-related
I have added some info to your sandbox with some references to some of the staff members. --Rtkat3 (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Oops
You messed up. You do NOT do moves like that while an AFD is in process.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Update: I have moved the article with history BACK to mainspace. For now... work on it THERE. Patience, grasshopper... patience.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * AND you now have a copy I have placed in User:Jhenderson777/Midtown High School. What edits you do to one, do also to the other.     Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midtown High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spider-Man (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Other Spider-Man articles
I really like what you've done creating all of the articles lately of different versions of Spider-Man! It has definitely taken a lot of work and they look great. Life is very busy right now so I can't offer much help (I'll do what I can when I can), but I can offer words of encouragement to let you know your effort is noticed and appreciated. Spidey 104  20:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Spider-Verse Spider-Men.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Verse Spider-Men.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Response
Satanus made a few appearances in Batman/Superman last year, you can look it up. Blaze appeared in a New 52 Supergirl story as well, she historically hasn't appeared in as many Superman-related titles as Satanus but it's irrelevant since both characters share a wikipedia page.

I am not overly impressed with the comments you left after reverting my edit on the navbox, which by itself didn't bother me as much since it would've been better if you had said nothing at all. Not only have you contradicted yourself on based on your past comments like being civil, deciding whether to add or remove character entries based on quantity of media adaptations (which btw, a lot of these characters even when adapted to other media did not even appear in Superman-centric stuff), I am also beginning to think you are spiting me deliberately.Haleth (talk) 16:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

A few characters off the top of my head who lack past appearances in Superman-centric media...Ultra Humanite? Atomic Skull as supervillain? But like Neutron, they all debuted as Superman villains and aren't canon immigrants like Darkseid which according to other editors should face stricter tests on how integral they are to the key concepts of the subject matter they have been imported into.

I think you missed what I said in the first sentence of the second paragraph. It wouldn't have bothered me much, if at all, if you had simply reverted without saying anything. I didn't go back and edit war again, did I? I tend to let things go if what I did REALLY bothers someone that much. I assume you probably realized that your comments were rude, which is why you decided to discuss it on my talk page. So I do appreciate that. Keep in mind that you have assumed bad faith probably as much as I did towards you, which is likely because we did a lot of edit warring in the past. And you refer to other editors being tough on you...well did he call your edits "pathetic", or made any other personal slights towards you in any way like implying that you are some crazed fan boy? It doesn't mean I get offended, but I am certainly less inclined to take you seriously.

I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense if it's all about media adaptations for the sake of it. If a Superman villain was used as some random Justice League villain without his or her connection to Superman being emphasized, then that shouldn't count especially when some of us have pushed for the strict and more exclusive nature of these navbox templates...it just means it's more likely that the character warrants a page on their own right. Just because a particular character doesn't have a lot of multimedia appearances, doesn't mean their presence in the comic book medium is to be dismissed.

So for example, Deathstroke have appeared in an animated Batman movie, a Batman animated series and two Batman video games so far, but that still doesn't qualify him as a Batman villain by your standards, am I right? By contrast, you also thought Doctor Death should have been included for the Batman navbox because of that milestone first appearance, and you started questioning whether I was biased or only into recent very comics after I reasoned that he is very obscure and hasn't really been used more in the Batman mythos over its 75+ years of history. I re-added him back to the navbox after thinking about the points you made. I'm not trying to open another can of worms, but comparing two different scenarios and the line of reasoning you are on.

And not everyone uses a mobile device to access wikipedia. Haleth (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

And again you are contradicting yourself. That is the complete opposite of the reasoning you gave in your comments when you reverted my edit: that Blaze and Satanus had no media adaptations. But they, like the other characters I mentioned earlier with little to no media presence, have established themselves as Superman villains in the comic book medium. And again, you're going "all bad faith" and passive aggressive on me after lecturing me to do the exact opposite in your last reply, now you are wondering out loud if you are going to "bother reading all of that" or insinuating that I will always "find an issue with how it works". Have you thought about the length of my reply was in response to you making three separate edits in a row on my talk page before I had the chance to response? Why bother having a discussion at all if you aren't going to make a sincere attempt to read what the other side has to say, or that you are already vocalizing feelings of contempt and being dismissive? Do you even understand what I am trying to convey to you? I am not re-opening the discussion regarding Deathstroke, I am comparing the stance you took with the stance you are taking now. The reasoning I am gathering from you now is that the only reason for your objection is the lack of media appearances.

Boomerang isn't a good comparison because he was part of an ensemble who starred as villain protagonists in Superior Foes of Spider-Man last year, and has in fact appeared in a lot more media then what you are suggesting. A character like Spot would be more appropriate given the comparable number of appearances and level of significance he has in Spider-Man's rogues gallery. Between Blaze and Satanus, both of them have four Elseworlds versions in addition to the standard Pre-Flashpoint and New 52 versions.

I am getting to a point where I just don't feel like a discussion with you is worth my time based on your attitude. Prove me wrong. Or maybe don't bother, and I will respond in kind. Haleth (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

GrandLeader's changes to Spider-Man template
GrandLeader has a history of making additions to the Spider-Man template that don't belong. His recent edit includes notes saying the characters should stay because discussion supports their inclusion. I cannot find any such discussion so I left a message on his talk page about it. I thought I'd let you know since you and I are the two editors who most often revert his edits. I figure we can give him a little bit of time to come up with a discussion before we revert the edits. Spidey 104  16:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jessica Rabbit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man-related
You are doing a good job making the pages for Spider-Gwen and Spider-Man Noir. If we start seeing more of Spider-UK during or after the Secret Wars storyline, do you think you can establish his page. Also, I have noticed that you have redirected Spider-X to the Alternate versions of Spider-Man page even though he is not an alternate version of Peter Parker. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man-related 2
If Spider-UK does become recurring in the Web Warriors, would you have his page created then like they did with Spider-Woman of Earth-65 and Spider-Man Noir. There is already a page for Spider-Ham. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Men in Black (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thanks for acknowledging my Quality improvement efforts at The Land of Gorch.

Much appreciated,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Looney Tunes-related
I heard you helped improve the List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters page by leaving links for the characters. I'd like to let you know that some of the links are redirecting to that page. If you would like to recreate their page, go right ahead. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Ai Apaec-related
It has come to my attention that you were the one who redirected Ai Apaec to the Alternate versions of Spider-Man page even though he only acted as Spider-Man when a part of the second incarnation of Norman Osborn's Dark Avengers just like how Mac Gargan's Venom appearance operated as Spider-Man in the first incarnation. I'm just wondering what the motive for that was. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It may work in the incarnation area as he is one of the Dark Avengers Spider-Men. If any of the other surviving spider characters start making other appearances in the Web Warriors part, then perhaps they might get their own pages soon. The Peter Parker of Earth-1610 turned up alive alongside the Green Goblin of Earth-1610. After the defeat of the Green Goblin of Earth-1610, that reality's Peter Parker retired from being Spider-Man officially allowing Miles Morales to succeed him while he left New York with Mary Jane Watson. --Rtkat3 (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * When the other spider characters get notability like the Spider-Woman of Earth-65, then we can have their pages mage. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot)
User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of incarnations of Spider-Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nightstalkers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Spider-man enemies
There is no indication on the rogues gallery list that the enemies should only include "major" characters. Why not include other notable characters which are also part of spider-man's rogue gallery? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettWarr1 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jhenderson777!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Jhenderson777, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks both for your contributions to Wikipedia and also for being a valued friend and colleague. Very best wishes to you! --Tenebrae (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rogues Gallery
Template:Rogues Gallery has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 14:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Avengers
Iron max 2 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)The team has made a lot of enemies over the years that should be added to their navboxIron max 2 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Man allies
Iron max 3 (talk Adding allies to his infobox that should not be removed, Iron max 3 (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Input requested
There is a dispute at Talk:Spider-Man and the X-Men over whether a redlink editor's edits violate WikiProject Comics guidelines as fancruft and issue-by-issue synopses. A comparison of two versions is here. I am writing to some longtime Project editors individually, since Portal talk:Comics appears to have very little traffic and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Notice board has had no postings in years. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edge-of-spider-verse-1--100339.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Edge-of-spider-verse-1--100339.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Iron max 3 sock puppet?
Hi Jhenderson777,

I noticed your run-ins with. Is it just me, or does have a very similar editing style and attitude? Iron max 3 has not been blocked, so I don't know if having multiple accounts at this point goes against the guidelines. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * It definitely seems like him which is a clear violation of WP:SOCK. It should also be noted that he has User:Iron max 2 as well, which I only warned him about because the names are so similar. But now that we think he is operating a completely different account, It should probably be brought up for review.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, I starting to wonder if they all are socks of User:Rymax23, who has been blocked.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Judging by the topic and similar style of editing, it does appear to be so, yes. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Similar editing styles indeed. Along with similar interests. If they do happen to be the same person then he/ she is abusing multiple accounts and that is against the guideline that TriiipleThreat already mentioned. The editor should be blocked if so. We should totally put the accounts in review like I did with Rymax.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I reopened the investigation at Sockpuppet investigations/Rymax23.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Man Enemies rewrite
I'm not sure if you already know about this but considering you worked so hard to rewrite and maintain List of Spider-Man enemies (good work BTW), I thought you should know. Someone here has proposed another overhaul. I figured you would have an opinion on this. DarkKnight2149 00:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey I wanted to say I love the way you organized this page by villains debuting. I love this structure and is the most logical for a page like that and the best way to prevent other heroes villains from appearing on the list that aren't associated with them. I was wondering if you could apply it to other heroes' rogue galleries/enemies pages or teach me how to do it?

Fluffyroll11 (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

So with that being said I don't see how the Spider-Man villains page is incomplete but, could you do the same formatting to the Avengers enemies page? Also what do you think should it just be villains that debuted in the avengers or should each villain who appeared in an issue in order appear based off first appearance since Loki appears in issue number one but that wasn't his debut you know what I mean?

Fluffyroll11 (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Batman template
I wanted to understand your deletions from the Batman template. According to the article on Batman's supporting characters, Spoiler is part of the New 52 Batman Family, and so are Batwoman and Catwoman. Yet, you deleted them from the template, with the last two only from the public identity row. Also, if you don't want Batman, Inc within the Batman Family section, could they at least be in the supporting characters section?

Thanks, so trying to understand.--Coquidragon (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for replying. I see what you are saying, but then the template needs to be redesigned. Why having a code name section and a public identity section if you are only going to name the character once? It misses the point. By taking some names out to prevent the duplication you are talking about, then the lists become incomplete. I think both names should be there, whether you know the code name or the public name. That's how the NavBox was designed and that's what they are for, aren't they? As to the Batman, Inc. section, if there are no articles to some of them, we could at least list those who do have articles, can't we? Thanks again for looking into this.--Coquidragon (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Move of Phantom Eagle reverted.
Please do not move pages with incoming links without first establishing a consensus through Requested moves. Please do not create WP:TWODABS disambiguation pages without first establishing the absence of a primary topic. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Response to message
Hey, thanks for the message. Were you talking about the BRD comment? NatGertler (IIRC) made that comment right after I patrolled it. Lib arts premed96 (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent copy-and-paste merges
...need to be redone. The way in which you've done it (as here) fails to comply with our licensing requirements. See WP:MERGETEXT for detailed instructions, with #2 and 4 in particular explaining what you need to fix. postdlf (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

DC Comics villains-related
My congratulations to you for having gotten the pages for recurring DC Comics villains Doctor Alchemy, Fiddler, Rainbow Raider, and Turtle reviewed. Especially since some of them appeared in The Flash. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DarthBane-frontal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:DarthBane-frontal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Comics. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Comic Book Character infobox addition help request
Hey I wanted to make an addition to the comic book character info box template and was wondering if you could help me or point me in the right direction to make it happen? I wanted to add a relatives section to it since real people also have them on their info boxes so why why not comic book characters as well? What do you think? and how can I make it happen? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey what do you think of this idea? Also do you want to weigh in on it? I need like 1 or 2 more supporters to get it approved. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah I already started the process you just need to comment on it on the Wikiproject comics talk page. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)                : Hey sorry to keep pestering you but, could you weigh in on this topic here?
 * Hey so your a much more seasoned wikipedia user than myself so I was wondering if you could possibly tell me two things? Is there a way to solve those issue that may arise with the relatives field returning? And what is the purpose of the talk pages? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Avengers Enemy List
Hey since your a much more seasoned Wikipedia editor than myself want to work together in formatting the Avengers enemies list like you did to Spiderman's enemy list which is a rogues gallery list? The Avengers would be more challenging since they fight not just characters who debut in their comics but, ones from the rogues gallery of the ranks. So we would have to become more creative in how we note stuff and list it but, would essentially be like the way you did the Spider-Man enemies list page. So what do you say? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 15:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Gwen response
In your last edit summary about Spider-Gwen, you did say you were neutral if someone disagreed. I was planning on having to put in a section for the characters of Earth-65 outside of the Gwen Stacy of Earth-65 like the Bodega Bandit, a variation of the Yancy Street Gang, the organization S.I.L.K., and a female variation of Sam Wilson. If you would like to help with the brief information of the Earth-65 characters that don't have Earth-616 counterparts, you're welcome to help out. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I left a message on the talk page for Spider-Gwen if that is what you meant. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Return to the Spider-Verse related
I was wondering if you have watched Ultimate Spider-Man where they just started showing the first of the four-part episode "Return to the Spider-Verse" which features some alternate Spider characters that never appeared in comics. If we were to modify the page that talks about the alternate spider characters like Spyder-Knight, a different type of Blood Spider from a Vampire-dominated world, Wolf Spider, Web Beard, and Webslinger the Spider-Cowboy as none of them appeared in the comics yet. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Miles Morales and Gwen Stacy
Thanks for the compliment, Jim. However, I don't read Spider-Gwen, and I cut back my editing drastically in April 2014. That, along with the 40 hour a week job I now have, makes large-scale additions of sourced material like the one you requested unlikely, at least from me. The thing is, the character hasn't been around that long, and hasn't made that many appearances, right? If your primary interest is creating a Powers and abilities section, and you have all her appearances (or are capable/willing to get them), you should be able to glean that info from the books. I'm sorry I can't be more help to you there. Nightscream (talk) 23:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I got your confused with this guy. Good luck with the article! :) Nightscream (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Venom vs. carnage.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Venom vs. carnage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vulturecomics.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Vulturecomics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 03:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; ;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello : Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tenebrae (talk) 09:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

"Ain't I a stinker" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the "Ain't I a stinker" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Gwen Vol. 2-related
Hi. I was wondering what you think of the recent volumes of Spider-Gwen and Earth-65's version of the Earth-616 characters that you know. We'll be seeing some other issues in this volume by 2017. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Joker (character) nominated for deletion
You are invited to take part at the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Joker (character).  Dark Knight  2149  23:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Military Comics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Military Comics, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Copying between Wikipedia Pages
Hi Jhenderson777! As mentioned a couple of sections above, whenever you copy text from one article to another, you do need to put that fact in the Edit Summary (at very least) stating where it came from. Your splitting off of Johnny Thunder to Johnny Thunder (John Tane) did not do this. I saw you did list it after the fact when another user tagged it for paraphrase, but if you did that when you copied in the material, that is the most preferred way, per our licensing requirements. An edit summary such as: Added content copied from Article Name Copied From, which see for attribution is perfect for that. Please see WP:CWW for the whys and wherefores, and other methods of providing this required attribution. Thanks for all your work! <b style="color: black;">Crow</b><i style="color: black">Caw</i> 15:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes thank you. Although I did mention did where it came from earlier. See here. Thank you for your work too. Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Help with iron Man's Armor deletion
Hey I need your help. It has been suggested that Iron Man's Armor to be deleted and I need your help to prevent that from happening. I'm planning to use to get the citation needed to save the article. I really need your help to prevent this from dying, please I really need you.Penguin7812 (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:X-MenFirstClassMoviePoster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:X-MenFirstClassMoviePoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Absolute Carnage article
Hey, how are you doing? I hope you're having a great time. I wanted to discuss something with you. I recently created a draft of Draft:Absolute Carnage since new information was released. I really want to your thoughts on my draft. I hope to hear you soon. Penguin7812 (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Memorial Day
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Rtkat3 (talk) is wishing you a Happy Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!

Share this message by adding {{subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Cobalt Blue (comics)
Cobalt Blue (comics) redirects to List of Flash enemies, but since your 05:30, 24 May 2018 edit removed that section, readers are left hanging. You might want to restore some minimal amount of content from that previous version or the former standalone article's page history. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Spider-Man's powers and equipment
Draft:Spider-Man's powers and equipment was deleted as an abandoned draft; if/when you want to pick back up working on it, let me know and I can restore it. BOZ (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man (Insomniac Games)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spider-Man (Insomniac Games) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man (Insomniac Games)
The article Spider-Man (Insomniac Games) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spider-Man (Insomniac Games) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man (Insomniac Games)
The article Spider-Man (Insomniac Games) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Spider-Man (Insomniac Games) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 06:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

The Catalog of Copyright Entries
Hi Jhenderson777,

I know that I'm *very* late with this information re: Lex Luthor but thought you might be able to use it in your future editing.

Check out the Internet Archive's scanned editions of the United States Copyright Office's official record, The Catalog of Copyright Entries.

Catalog of Copyright Entries 1940 Periodicals Jan-Dec New Series Vol 35 Pt 2 (page 129 in original / page 142 in scan) gives a copyright date of February 23, 1940 for the April issue of Action Comics (#23).

Catalog of Copyright Entries 1940 Periodicals Jan-Dec New Series Vol 35 Pt 2 page 240 gives a copyright date of January 23, 1940 for the Spring 1940 issue of Superman (#4).

Here are other examples of historic issues:

Catalog of Copyright Entries 1939 Periodicals New Series Vol 34 Pt 2 page 164 gives a copyright date of March 30, 1939 for the May issue of Detective Comics (#27).

Catalog of Copyright Entries 1940 Periodicals Jan-Dec New Series Vol 35 Pt 2 page 373 gives a copyright date of November 22, 1940 for the Winter 1940-41 issue of All Star Comics (#3)

In addition to the Internet Archive, you can find various links to other sites with scans of the Catalog of Copyright Entries here Copyright Catalog.

It should be pointed out that while we as readers/collectors of comic books look at sales dates, if DC Comics (or any other publisher) needed to defend their copyright in a legal action, they would be using the Copyright Office's information first and foremost. [Please note that I am not an attorney!]

Finally because the Catalog of Copyright Entries is a work of the United States Government, it is in the public domain. Feel free to take a screen shot of any relevant information and post it anywhere as per Public domain image resources.

Let me know if I can assist in any future searches.

Mtminchi08 (talk) 01:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Loki (Marvel Cinematic Universe)
I think this is close to finished, but would like a second set of eyes. What do you think? bd2412 T 21:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Speaking of these, I have just made Natasha Romanoff (Marvel Cinematic Universe) live today. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

In all honesty
I used to be an inclusionist. Some of my first entries where trivial places from Honorverse, pure fancruft as I'd judge them today. But that war was lost when notability policies evolved. Now all such articles have better homes at wikia (fandom), with only some retained here. Frankly, if anything annoys me about this is that there is a user or two who insist on removing any mention of those websites, which I find counterproductive in light of WP:BTW. In the end, it's not that having an entry for all Pokemons is impossible, but if we lower our standards for them, it makes it difficult to enforce them for other things (like, all books, all products, all shops, all people...). Removing fancruft is more along the lines of enforcing WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, really. A pleasant diversion from fighting with real spammers who get paid for pushing PR pieces for their customers (companies, people, etc). --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Comic book elements planned for deletion
On some of the pages that you contested the deletion for, I have noticed that you supported the keep for them and have backed you up on them. For the part on Big Man, I had originally established that page as a set index to detail the other Big Man characters like the one in Marvel Comics 2. I just wanted to let you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Goblin (Marvel Comics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goblin (Marvel Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Goblin (Marvel Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Superior-Spider-Man-26.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Superior-Spider-Man-26.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Goblin (Marvel Comics)
Now that Goblin (Marvel Comics) has been redirected to List of Spider-Man enemies (I actually plan on filing an WP:ANI report pretty soon in regard to the blind spammings that are currently taking place at WP:AFD; the user in question has displayed tendencies of WP:POINT, WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:IDHT, and several others, and has been banned from fictional character deletion discussions for similar behaviours in the past), a Goblin section should probably be added to the article or created as a disambiguation page (not to be confused with the hubpage that just got redirected). Despite, , and claiming WP:OR, several primary and secondary sources were listed confirming the connection between the characters, so the claims that the article was "a collection of unrelated topics" objectively holds no water.  Dark Knight  2149  06:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 21:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC) <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Good luck
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px; " class="plainlinks"> 豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune. このミラPはJhenderson777たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP 02:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Rtkat3 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Holidays!
Have a great rest of your holiday season! If you do not, then you should know that I have acquired a very particular set of skills on my time on Wikipedia. Skills that make me a nightmare for people who do not enjoy themselves. If you do not have a great time this year, I will find you... And I will block you.

But seriously, happy holidays.  Dark Knight  2149  22:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year Jhenderson777!
<div style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif;float:right;margin-bottom:20px;margin-right:10px">Happy New Year! Hello Jhenderson777: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ★Trekker (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Wishing you a happy 2020
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#1D4E89; background-color:#0f4c81; border-width:2px; text-align:left; color:white; padding:3px; max-width:750px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);>

Jhenderson777, Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year   – news article. – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year Send New Year cheer by adding     to user talk pages.

– Rtkat3 (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Items
thanks for your edit just now at AFD for Batman (Thomas Wayne). and by the way, your user talk page is very interesting, re topics generally covered here. nice to meet you! thanks for your comment. --Sm8900 (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spider-ManDLC.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Spider-ManDLC.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supermanflying.png
Thanks for uploading File:Supermanflying.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 03:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

re: prodding
"how many articles you said were inclusive on". Just yesterday on HARNET I guess :) (Through a second opinion there would be welcome). Few days ago I added refs to all of the characters from Wuthering Heights as I found this franchise has been analyzed heavily, so instead of prods its just needed references from a simple BEFORE. Few weeks ago I did the same for some of Gibson's characters like this one, through I did prod/AfD some other stuff from William Gibson (Articles for deletion/The Sprawl, ). I tried to save as many of my beloved List of Babylon 5 characters as I could (for example and subsequent edits, see also still-live merge discussion there), which in the end meant 3 or 4, and we had to get rid of almost everything else related to that universe, since we couldn't find good sources :( Shrug. Some stuff is notable, some is not, some is borderline and needs a discussion. Btw, I'd use mergers more but I need to figure out a good tool for that (Village_pump_(technical)), suggestions appreciated. PS. I don't mind plot, but an encyclopedic article should go beyond it. A few weeks ago I expanded the article on Tolkien Encyclopedia, and it is interesting and relevant as in the discussion of its quality, the editors and reviewers both draw a stark difference in quality between some entries, noting that some are excellent, containing analysis, reception, etc. - but others are low quality because they are "just plot summaries". Such low quality entries need to be improved. If there are sources, we can wait, but if our search shows none I think deletion is something to consider. That's all. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Batarang
Hi there: I'm glad that you're involved in the Batarang AfD -- it's super frustrating that people seem to be so eager to delete comics content right now. I think your point that "a lightsaber is just a space sword, the Batmobile is just a car" is really well made; I'm probably going to steal that and use it in another AfD discussion someday. :)

I can see that you're getting a little heated right now, making sure to answer back to every delete-friendly post. I think at this point that we've successfully demonstrated that the Batarang is notable. All we have to do now is wait for some more uninvolved people to come along, look at the evidence, and vote keep. What do you think about just letting it be right now, and giving space for other folks to weigh in? -- Toughpigs (talk) 01:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hey, sorry to ping you again, but you really are getting heated on that AfD. I know he's being really frustrating, but getting into a one-on-one with him is not going to help. :) More people will come along and they'll help us out. -- Toughpigs (talk) 05:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HawkgirlBrightestDay.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:HawkgirlBrightestDay.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Comics characters
Hi, can we talk about the Quality Comics redirects that you're making? I disagree with you on those. -- Toughpigs (talk) 00:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Spider-Man characters.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spider-Man characters.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Removing characters from DC timeline
Hi, I kind of understand why you're taking links off of pages when the target page has been deleted. But why are you taking out links and references to Doll Girl (here), Doctor Death (comics) (here) and Tigress (DC Comics) (here)? Those all have existing pages. For the Doctor Death example, you're even taking out the mention that Batman had a first supervillain? What's going on? — Toughpigs (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Because no notability has been proven on those. Me and Argento Surfer agreed that we should stick to major characters anyway. Just because the article exists doesn’t mean anything. You said yourself that Doctor Death is minor and not a clear consensus was made to prove it. So he doesn’t need to included. I practically created the timeline article anyway. Sometimes I change mind. Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of DC Comics major characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beppo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_DC_Comics_major_characters check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_DC_Comics_major_characters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Black Canary (Dinah Drake)
That image actually represents Dinah Laurel Lance, not Dinah Drake.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay, I have replaced my initial image with another Dinah Drake as Black Canary, from the issue of Justice League of America #73 (august 1969).--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * are you going to split Azrael (comics) to Azrael (Jean Paul Valley) etc.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Doctor Fate-related and more
I'll see what I can do about the Doctor Fate character that you asked me to help you out on. Outside of that, I did start an enemies section for Doctor Fate, Sandman, and Starman to name a few in the event that you want to help out in that. Also, thanks for helping establish the Monster Society of Evil page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * My mistake. FuriousFreddy created the redirect and you split the information. If you would like, you can find information notable to give the wielders of the H-Dial like Robby Reed their own page. You did a good job with handling the versions of Doctor Fate and Hourman. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Emotional Spectrum response
It was nice of you to split the Star Sapphires from the Star Sapphire page. I can provide the intro and the infobox for the Orange Lantern Corps, but we need to get a group history into that sandbox before we can establish the page which will be added. Then we'll add the link into the Green Lantern template. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Lizardfilm.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lizardfilm.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Rhino-2-.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhino-2-.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Mandarin (Iron Man 3).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mandarin (Iron Man 3).jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Red Tornado-related
Hi. If we were to convert the Red Tornado page to a set index so that I can forward the Lois Lane version to it, what should we rename the android version that is part of the Justice League? We can add brief information about it and Ma Hunkel to the set index to improve it as well. I'm just asking here. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be a good idea. Though "Red Tornado (John Smith)" would have to be redirected to "Red Tornado (android)" since John Smith is one of Red Tornado's aliases. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Though the rebooted version that debuted in Dark Nights: Metal did not use that alias. So we'll stick with "Red Tornado (android)" when the set index is established as John Smith was not his only alias. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MCU-characters.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:MCU-characters.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wally West.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Wally West.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Stargirl-related
Hi. I was planning to make a template for Stargirl and I was wanting to know in your opinion if the template would be Template:Stargirl or Template:Stars and S.T.R.I.P.E. I did work on Stargirl's page to list her supporting characters and her enemies where some of them still have their Wikipedia pages. What do you think? --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I suppose I can call the template by the name of Template:Stargirl and place the Stars and S.T.R.I.P.E. in it's publication section. Pat Dugan and Shining Knight are supporting characters of the comic series I just mentioned. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Mario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Final boss ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Super_Mario check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Super_Mario?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Super Mario
Hi. I get the impression you're not aware there are sections in Yoshi's Island in which Mario is playable, hence the game meeting all of the criteria you devised. I'm still acknowledging the debate over its inclusion in the Super Mario series, but Mario being playable in it is undeniable. Ozdarka (talk) 13:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Please slow down
I see you have created a template about something few people have ever heard of, the Great Lakes Megalopolis. Do you think it might be a good idea to gain some sort of consensus before adding your new template to every article about a city or town within 100 miles of the Great Lakes? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes second that. I came here to make the same comment. You’re tagging articles in Kansas with a concept based around the Great Lakes and primarily promoted by a few media outlets; I don’t see much in the way of quality academic level research to support that it is widely used descriptor. Certainly from my vantage point in Missouri, and this is of course my subjective opinion, folks would be quite surprised to hear we are part of such a megalopolis. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Again I am basing it on a source which the navbox already noted. I am not being subjective. Jhenderson  7 7 7  17:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * This is too big a change to make based on your source or one editors opinion. When multiple editors caution you, it may be a good idea to slow down and build consensus for the changes first. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Multiple editors? It just is you two. and it's not my source but the RPA. Assume good faith and respect Wp:Bebold.   Jhenderson  7 7 7  17:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I am not doubting it's a good idea. Just that I thought it could be bold since it's desktop only. Also since there is already templates of different megaregions. I planned to do all of them based on it though that Great Lakes one was the longest \ toughest  Jhenderson  7 7 7  17:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Two is multiple, and I think there will be more. I hope you don’t think I’m questioning your good faith, not sure where you got that impression. I’m squarely focused on the edits. Citing WP:Be bold is a great policy, but remember Be bold not reckless; I think this is bordering on the latter. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I have been a consistent editor for a long time. I have made GA’s and other articles. To say I am leaning on being reckless for adding a Navboxes on pages seems kind of insulting. I said there will be more but the only page they will probably link to multiple times is the megaregion page. Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You’ve done good work, no need to be insulted, do you see why we are concerned? Grey Wanderer (talk) 21:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Why would I see that. It’s just reverts of cities that aren’t in templates. Besides Pittsburgh and Kansas City. The Kansas City one shouldn’t undo edits with that kind of rationale. Jhenderson 7 7 7  22:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have started a discussion about this at Talk:Detroit. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Great Lakes Megalopolis
Template:Great Lakes Megalopolis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Comics drafts
Greetings, I've been trying to develop a few drafts but I still need help: Another user and I try to do that before, but we do not have certain resources at all. I hope you can help us. If you cannot, Then thank you anyway. F. E. Puricelli (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Draft:Crossover (2020 comic book)
 * Draft:Event Leviathan
 * Draft:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (IDW Publishing)
 * Draft:King in Black
 * Draft:Perpetua (comics)
 * Draft:Rorschach (comic book)
 * Draft:Unlimited Power (comics)
 * Draft:World Forger
 * Draft:X of Swords