User talk:Jhovstkepp

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dustin Brown tennis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dustin Brown tennis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Tessanne Chin
Hey man, I just wanted to say thanks very much for all the chart info but I think it may be getting to be a bit too much. Notable charting accomplishments are a nice addition but I believe you might be adding just about every charting position she's had! Lol. It ultimately becomes a wall of text of information that isn't completely important. These articles tend to need concise summarizations. Nonetheless, I really appreciate the help with the page. I would've never been able to retrieve those chart positions myself! Lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceOffTournament (talk • contribs) 22:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

It's fine right now. :) I was just saying it's almost to the point of being too much. I considered adding a table but decided it was unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceOffTournament (talk • contribs) 01:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Tessanne Chin Discography
I've been wanting to upgrade the page's discography to feature tables, charting positions, and whatnot that matches the ones for Danielle Bradbery. Unfortunately I'm terrible at retrieving the appropriate chart and label information. So as a collaborative effort, would you like to help me build this? If you agree, can you still include her independent singles/independent debut album? Thank you.

FaceOffTournament (talk) 22:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm currently adding the template for her Voice album/performances. I guess that would be a good place for us to start. Thanks again for the help.

FaceOffTournament (talk) 23:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Alright, the tables for her Voice album/performances has been added. I apologize if it's difficult in anyway for you to fill it up. After those tables are finished, then we can tackle her non-Voice music.

FaceOffTournament (talk) 23:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

On second thought, nevermind. I realize how difficult including her pre-Voice work would on top of compiling all the chart positions. Having a table and chart information ultimately isn't that important and isn't worth the effort on both our parts. I just saw Danielle Bradbery's page and thought it looked pretty official, so that's what made me want to do it. But then realized that most celebrity pages don't have detailed charting information so it's not necessary. The current format is sufficient. Sorry to waste your time. I hope you didn't start working on it. :)

FaceOffTournament (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)