User talk:Jhstith

Little context in Brunswick Public Schools
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Brunswick Public Schools, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Brunswick Public Schools is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Brunswick Public Schools, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Brunswick Public Schools itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. I notice you fixed the article, but you still should not remove the speedy tag yourself-- a passing admin will see the changes and remove the tag if appropriate Coren 05:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Logofill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Logofill.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:BCPSlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BCPSlogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Logofill.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logofill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BCPSlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:BCPSlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sonic3-box-korea.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sonic3-box-korea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:420px-Sonic3-box-korea.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:420px-Sonic3-box-korea.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brunlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brunlogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Stronger withEach Tear has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wyatt 915 ✍  22:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Stronger with Each Tear. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. <b style="color:#5b9f42;">W</b><b style="color:#30a000;">y</b><b style="color:#008000;">a</b><b style="color:#30a000;">t</b><b style="color:#5b9f42;">t</b> <b style="color:#3080a0;">9</b><b style="color:#0000fb;">1</b><b style="color:blue;">5</b> ✍  22:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Stronger with Each Tear
Why do you keep changing "Stronger with Each Tear" to "Stronger witheach tear"? every retailer and blige's own website calls the album Stronger with Each Tear. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Stronger with Each Tear has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 23:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * That doesn't matter. (btw twitter is not a reliable source). Wikipedia is an academic peice of work, this mean thats everything has to be written in proper english. withEach is not proper english whereas with Each is. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC))#
 * Whether its called withEach or with Each makes no difference. The second is proper english and so it is automatically included on wikipedia cus of grammer rules. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC))


 * I hear what your saying but its just not going to happen. We cannot make an exception to rules. Wikipedia is an academic body of work that should be treated with academic values. Although whitney's new album is called "I Look To You" in its spoken form and grammatical correctness it is spelt I Look to You on wikipedia. It will be the same for Stronger with Each Tear otherwise it is confusing and people will assume that 'withEach' is a new word or something. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC))

July 2014
Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mary J. Blige without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! STATic message me!   00:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Strength of a Woman (album). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please read the note on Strength of a Woman (album). It says: "Please SOURCE any future singles. We need a reliable news site CALLING the song a single, not a social media post." That Instagram post you linked does not say the song is a single. Regular songs can have cover art made for them these days, and debuting on a Billboard chart does not make it a single either. We need a news article from a reliable source calling "Set Me Free" a single, and even if it is, there is no reason to remove the title track as a single.  Ss 112  01:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)