User talk:Jhutson64

Helping you save your article
Hi Jhutson64. I was going through the list of articles for deletion and came across Michael Potts. I posted a "weak delete" recommendation for the article, but I decided to tell you how you can save it. Right now the way to save it is to provide better sources. You need to provide independent secondary sources that has Michael Potts as the subject. For example, a chapter in a book (that was written by someone unrelated) that talks about the phenomenon of the man, or a news article from a website that talks more about the man himself and not just about what happened to his company.

When you find those sources, you can let other editors know here, and if you want you can let me know here so I can change my recommendation. All the best!--Samuel Tan (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey there! I just saw the new source. I will retract my "weak delete" recommendation and let other editors know about the source. I don't have a Goliath account so I can't view the contents, but I'll alert the other people "patrolling" the deletion lists that your article may be notable :) - Samuel  Tan  15:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again :) I can't view the article - it won't even allow me to sign up. Don't worry, though. The way the deletion process works is that the article will be up for deletion for 5 days, after which an administrator will see if there is a consensus to delete it. So you have two or three days left. At this point I think it is unlikely to be deleted because, well, no one else has commented on the article. Meanwhile I'll keep watching the deletion process.- Samuel  Tan  01:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup I've changed my stance on the Andrew Wolk article to weak keep after seeing your new sources. See how the discussion goes on the deletion forums. I'm guessing it won't be deleted in the end :) - Samuel  Tan  15:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:PHR logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:PHR logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Andrew Wolk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew Wolk.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Michael Potts.gif


The file File:Michael Potts.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Wolk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Wolk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andrew Wolk& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)