User talk:Jianhui67/Archive October 2013

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Xavier: Renegade Angel
No I meant to do it because i suffer from ocd and wikipedia is something I base my information on and I just want things to be basic. Xavier: Renegade Angel has made my life confusing and all of the previous wikipedia information wasnt good. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachvogt (talk • contribs) 05:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ross Hill  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ross_Hill&action=edit&section=new Talk to me! ] 16:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Book of Daniel, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * If this needs an explanation, according to WP:PRIMARY the Book of Daniel is no scholarly authority upon... the Book of Daniel. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camp Resilience (NPCC)


The article Camp Resilience (NPCC) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I really don't see the notability here; almost no sources and I can't find a policy that auto-qualifies the page for inclusion. Jeremy112233 (talk) 02:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeremy112233 (talk) 02:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow! Thanks! ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 14:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Suppression
if you see something like that on the future, please use one of the methods documented at WP:RFO to report it, as opposed to discussing it on-wiki which can draw attention to it, the exact opposite of what is desirable. thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply for query, wrongly posted in my talk. भास्कर्  Bhagawati   Speak  07:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Little Man Computer
Why undo the edits on the Little Man Computer when they are actually corrections / improvements? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.9.7 (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Ross Hill ( talk ) 01:17, 16 Oct 2013 (UTC) 01:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Change in Wikipedia:Quality Control
I see you have undit an edit of mine on the page entitled "Wikipedia: Quality control". I am completely serious when I say that it was a mistake on your part. I realize that knicker-knot may be a cultural term, but it is no less an accurate word to describe people who abuse their editing privilege. Furthermore, "sour apples" can be taken different ways. Many people might not understand what it means. I implore that you see it in your heart to change it back. I mean no disrespect, and was only trying to edit the page for the benefit of it as a whole.

Yours truly,

Brett Maxwell George 1432 Good S. Greely ON, Canada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.114.172.185 (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Oops sorry. I reverted your edit because it seems like vandalism. I have reverted back to your edit. ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 13:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much! ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 14:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Nice work

 * Thanks! ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 13:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Ross Hill ( talk ) 19:01, 20 Oct 2013 (UTC) 19:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 13:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Dominant Minority
Hello Jianhui67, what happened to the Dominant minority page prior to my edits like all the list of dominant minorities and or the paragraphs describing situations of dominant minorities in various nations where did it all go and why was it erased?!!! Or was it you who deleted all that information if so Why?!!! and if it was you who did that was it your page and or place to do that?!!!!!

If not who page does it belong to? as I would try to alert that person because you're messing with their page.

Answer me these questions!

User:IceBrotherhood (talk) 12:003, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi IceBrotherhood. I reverted your changes to Dominant minority because they are not helpful. I reverted using the 'good faith-revert' button. You can actually find the revision of the article that you have edited on its revision history. Thanks. ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 14:48, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Kristen LePine
Hey. I creted the Kristen LePIne page. I edited it because the previous version of the page was just taken verbatim from Kristen LePine's webpage, so I edited it to prevent it from deletion. Since you undid the changes it got deleted. I even put that I made the chaanges because of this in the aticle's talk page. I'm not trying to be the bad person here, but you can see how this is frustrating to me. If you could put that page back up, that would be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romero221 (talk • contribs) 14:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Romero221. The page you created was deleted by WP:CSD as it has no significance. I am not an administrator here. Only administrators can restore pages. Thanks. ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 14:48, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please make a compromise by interfaring.
Hi Jianhui67, I am Changing and Upgrading the Information on page Mehidpur_City as there is two mehidpur, 1. Mehidpur City 2. Mehidpur Road So that would be better if we specify that which one is this. and I have updated it with external links too.

The problem is that the user:Ishdarian Don't let it be Mehidpur City and chages to mehidpur as soon as I change to Mehidpur City.

and he is not even want to compromise some things that are extreamly good for this page. like link to google map and extinguish to the Mehidpur road. So kindly take an action. Grv User:Grv10india(Grv10india (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC))

Thanks
Hi. I appreciate the welcome to Wikipedia. The cookies looked nom. :) I've actually edited quite a bit before.  It makes me feel old to say so, but starting about a decade ago.

If I can pester you for a bit, there are these cool boxes all over your home page that display special skills, interests, passions, and abilities. Is there perhaps a list of those somewhere? TheAltarbo (talk) 08:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Altarbo. You can take a look at WP:Userboxes for the various userboxes that you can display on your user page. ''' Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 08:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I was in the right
"These fighters have been released from their UFC contracts, or announced their retirement, over the course of the last month. If their release has not been announced then they have been listed here based upon their removal from the UFC's rosters."

That's why I removed the content, that's a list of fighters who were cut recently, it has been a month as indicated by the hidden date, so I removed them from the list. 173.171.83.140 (talk) 08:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I don't think anyone was in the right here. Firstly, you (IP) didn't use the edit summary, so, of course, your edit was going to be reverted for unexplained removal of material from an article. However, I do think it is worth noting that the use of Rollback in this case was not needed. I have reverted back the Jianhui67's revision, and the removal of content can be discussed on the articles talk page. Many thanks.--Chip123456 08:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well actually I was in the right, it was already explained in the "Recent Cuts" section on the page, but I wrote on the talk page. I usually always write about my edit in the description unless it's understood on the page, in this case I thought it was pretty clear, I just hope my edit gets reverted back to the way it was, it was a correct edit and I explained why on the talk page. 173.171.83.140 (talk) 08:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I would also like to add after the 1st time it was reverted I did put a description in my edit, and it was still reverted. =/ 173.171.83.140 (talk) 09:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Talk page response requested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_current_UFC_fighters#Recent_Cuts

Can you please respond and then revert back to the way I had it which was correct? I'd do it but I don't wanna break 3RR. 173.171.83.140 (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Benison talk with me 12:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

I corrected an error in the biography of Shirley Knight, and you removed it saying the article was better before my correction. How can an incorrect statement be better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.11.129 (talk) 22:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)