User talk:Jiayi Li/Ding Ling/Bibliography

Your first source is not peer reviewed or scholarly. It also already exists as a source on the page. I asked you to avoid sources that were already mentioned. If you use this source for further assignments, you will not receive credit. -1

Your second source is peer reviewed and scholarly but already exists as a source on the page. I asked you to provide a justification for reusing the same source and you have not done so. I also outlined the consequences of not providing one. -1

Your third source is neither peer reviewed or scholarly. If you use this source for further assignments, you will not receive credit. -1

Your fourth source is neither peer reviewed or scholarly. If you use this source for further assignments, you will not receive credit. -1

It is impossible to determine where your fifth source comes from as you have just provided a pdf but the file does not contain a journal and also again does not appear to be peer reviewed or scholarly. -1

Your grade is 0/5.

You will have to find five new sources. The next assignment will require you to have read a suitable source, so please consider doing this before next week.

Please remember that your source needs to be in English, peer reviewed, and relatively current, 1980s and after preferably. There are many articles on Ding Ling and I do not find it reasonable that five suitable articles do not exist, but that you have not looked carefully. Qiandaizi (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)