User talk:Jibbajabba

Hi, Jibbajabba, and welcome to Wikipedia! The size and scope of this project can sometimes be daunting for newcomers, so I thought I would say hello and offer you a few helpful links that might make contributing easier (and I do hope you will continue to stay and contribute).


 * For a good quick introduction to Wikipedia and how it's used, check out Introduction and the Tutorial. There are also some tips for avoiding common mistakes.
 * Contributing to Wikipedia gives lots of good suggestions for things you can help out with around the encyclopedia, if you're looking for ideas!
 * How to edit a page and the Manual of Style offer some tips and guidelines to formatting your work here on Wikipedia; if you're looking for more help, check out the Help:Contents.
 * While Wikipedia is many things, there are also many things it cannot effectively be. Try and familiarize yourself with the policies regarding writing from a neutral point of view and what wikipedia is not.
 * Hesitant to begin? Be bold! Wikipedia relies on editors like you to succeed, so if you see something you feel needs work, go for it!

If you've still got questions, the FAQ and the Help desk are good places to start. Listing yourself at the new user log will likely guarantee a response from friendly fellow editors as well. If there's anything I can help with, don't hestitate to drop me a note on my talk page -- just remember to sign your comments with four tildes (like this: ~ ) and your signature will automatically be added.

Again, welcome!

— MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 22:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Why change it back?
But 'airplane' just sounds stupid. It would be better to leave it as 'aeroplane' if you have to pick one over the other. It grates on you?! This surprises me. What dialect do you speak? Do you say 'waterplane' or 'hydroplane' (except that's something else, my mind's not functioning! blergh)? Nicholas 18:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Most of the americans I talk to are from either New England or California, and I'm pretty sure I've heard them say 'aeroplane', though I have heard people on CNN/seen scrolling across the screen of CNN saying 'airplane', but I just assumed they were from Utah or Alabama or something. Also, what about on board vs. on‐board vs. onboard vs. aboard, any preferences there? I think I prefer the second (as used in C-130 Hercules) or the fourth. Oh, and please tell me you don't say "one fourth" when you mean one quarter, that gets on my tits :) Though I never hear americans saying "one second" for half. Nicholas

One of my best Californian buddies is a dedicated anglophile. Likes colour, flavour, favour, harbour etc. Prefers the accent and the culture. He is planning on overthrowing the religious extremist dictatorship controlling the country and reinstate democracy. :-) Nicholas 19:20, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

IPA
I was learning IPA and wanted something to practice on. I sent the text and a recording of me saying it to phonetics experts on wikipedia to see if I was getting it right, they made some corrections but not much. It was originally on the latin wikipedia as the english one didn't support Unicode. Nicholas 21:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Oxford and the -ize
The link was malformed in the previous edit, which is why it was asking for log-in information (I logged in and got an error message for my trouble. The correct link is on there now; figured you might be interested to read it since you obviously clicked it before. :-) Jibbajabba 23:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it works fine now. Thanks for letting me know. Flapdragon 00:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Copy/paste page moves
Hi. Thanks for reverting vandalism. In the future, you should not move pages by copying/pasting them. This hides the page history, and administrator intervention is required to fix it. You should move pages by clicking the "move" tab on the top, near the "edit this page" button. If your account is too new to be able to move pages, just let someone else do it. I have fixed the move. :) --Phroziac . o ºO (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 18:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I moved the others properly once I realized what happened, but I was editing that page at the time and I got an edit conflict with the redirect link. Apparently the move meant I was editing a different page-history wise... or something). Anyway, I just saved over it, which is how it ended up being temporarily impossible to move it back the normal way. Sorry, and thanks! Jibbajabba 21:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Labo(u)r movement
Hi Jibbajabbah. I think it would be preferable to keep the 'labor or labour' usage or even just stick with the spelling used in each article title. The version with brackets looks ugly and may simply confuse some readers - it isn't necessarily clear what the significance of the bracketed 'u' is. I don't think there is any precedent for it, either, WP:MOS-wise. Mattley (Chattley) 19:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Memory Alpha
Hello, I'm a fellow "Trekkie wannabe" and I use Memory Alpha regularly for information about Trek. I'm curious about your comment on the peer review page regarding the competition between Wikipedia and MA. I thought that was a great example considering how sparse the MA page for DS9 is versus the Wikipedia list of episodes. What other examples could we include that would demonstrate the "competitive" aspect? I know that I, as a fan, have often found myself torn between the two - e.g. my contributions would probably be seen by more people on Wikipedia but appreciated more on Memory Alpha. Thanks! Jibbajabba 19:18, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * What I meant to say is that we need some reference of this competition. Something to prove that MA editors have Wikipedia articles as a source of comparison and try to make their articles better than ours, and vice-versa. Some proof that it is an objective for them and for us to outbetter each other. Simply saying that there are articles on the same subject on both websites does not imply competition. By the way, may I ask you a question? Is there a difference between a trekker and a trekkie? You see, I'm really new to this thing. :) JoaoRicardotalk 23:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Minnesota speak
Unfortunately, I don't think I can be of much use to you. I am not familiar with NCAE, but from reading the article, I don't think people here speak it. That being said, I have only lived in Minnesota for half a year, and then too I live in the southeast corner, an hour from the border, so perhaps I am not getting the "true" Minnesota accent. Sorry&mdash;wish I could help more! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 04:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Sabo Mine page move
All the history has been lost somewhere along the way.WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 16:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a real mess. I wasn't accusing you of having done it, btw. I just saw your name on the page I finally ended up at. WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 16:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Fred Phelps
Which section (if any) on the Fred Phelps page is fiction, and why is it a hoax? If there are real factual faults about this page, please list them. Do not puut up a tag and leave without an explanation. If you do not explain the reason behind the "Hoax" tag within 24 hours, I will take off the tag from the Fred Phelps page. Arbiteroftruth 02:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I did explain on the talk page. It was in the section titled "Sources"... right above the section that questioned why the tag was placed on the page, ironically enough. Jibbajabba 07:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting the alteration of my userpage. Tom e rtalk 13:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Copy, Right?
How are your pictures copywrited? "don't be geppy with out hart!"--Gephart 08:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * ...What? I have no idea what you're talking about. Jibbajabba 18:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Warpcore
Hi,

Why the merge from warpcore to warp drive? I know that you proposed the 'merge to' some time ago, but it thought there had to be a vote about it (and i was the only one who commented). Just wondering. As the pages creator i hope at any rate something of what it there can be saved...if not restored. Many thanks. Pydos 19:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I didn't propose the merge, actually, I was just the one who moved it from warpcore to the proper name, warp core. Sorry for the confusion. Jibbajabba 19:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh sorry. I had just been expecting it to be taken over for some time now, and was just a bit trigger happy. Many thanks then - can you see what previous posters meant by it being in need of a cleanup? Possibly i've seen it to many times to see the flaws. Thanks. Pydos 11:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mall of America.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mall of America.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 17:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Reverted for now on Anti-war topics
I've reverted your edit on Template:Anti-war topics for now, because a red link on a sidebar template like this one is undesirable. Once there is an Opposition to the American Civil War article in place (it's not a bad idea!), by all means, please revert me back. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 20:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Oklahoma City article name
I saw that you had tried to move Oklahoma City to its proper name a while back. Chicago was recently moved successfully to its proper name. There is a somewhat greater acceptance now of using simple names for US cities in the absence of ambiguity although it is still strongly opposed by many who religiously adhere to the US city naming guideline. Being a regular editor of the Oklahoma City article, what do you think about attempting another move? --Polaron | Talk 05:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the very delayed reply. While a larger number of people do not like the strictness in application of the current US city naming guideline, many more people are still opposed to moving city article names "just for consistency" instead of looking at the actual reasons proposed for moving. You can look at the recent move debates at Talk:Boston, Massachusetts and Talk:San Francisco, California. It looks like Talk:Seattle, Washington and Talk:New Orleans, Louisiana are going to end up the same way. It might be best to wait until we can clarify what can and cannot be exempted before proposing the move for Oklahoma City. Cheers. --Polaron | Talk 15:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure if you're still around or are interested in this but it looks like someone else has already requested the article be moved to the simple name. See here. --Polaron | Talk 17:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Related requested moves are also at Talk:Houston, Texas and Talk:Los Angeles, California at this time. --Serge 00:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Phelps child picket.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Phelps child picket.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - crz crztalk 16:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:James Darren From the Heart.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:James Darren From the Heart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 06:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fred2004.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fred2004.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

United States presidential election, 2008
Please see that article's talk-page. We prefer to wait until after the presidential election, before adding images to the TopInfobox. GoodDay (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't know. Might be a good idea to put a note in there. No harm was intended. Jibbajabba (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to put a note in. Hopefully, somebody will do it. GoodDay (talk) 22:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I reverted my change and added it. Jibbajabba (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Herro
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. David Pro (talk) 12:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)