User talk:JikeSpingleton

Welcome
Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the project and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or ask me on, I will always be willing to help you on Wikipeia so you can ask your questions on my talk page and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Again, welcome and I hope to see you editing again!  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 22:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * My Talk Page (A Page That You Can Contact Me On)

Durgle
Hi JikeSpingleton. I have re-inserted the advert tag to your above-captioned article, and added the notability tag. Because you have tagged the article as under construction, I haven't yet tagged the article for deletion (speedy or otherwise) despite the fact that there are no external references to information not generated by the company or its founders. Bongomatic (talk) 15:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I dont understand how the entry is advertising? i assure you that it is being written from an objective, neutral, standpoint. I have referred to several other entries about similar companies and taken from them in the form of tone, style and formatting. The entry is still Under Construction and I am working on adding references. There is some content taken from w3c.org and I have referenced them at the bottom of the page. Please advise me on what further steps I could take to better the article and remove the advert tag from it... --JikeSpingleton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I suggest you have a look WP:CORP and WP:NPOV. I agree that the advert tag isn't very well tailored to articles about companies that read like press releases / personal histories. But since this article isn't explicitly written by someone from the company (though the fact that your only contributions to Wikipedia articles are on this topic suggests this might be the case), it can't be tagged for self-promotion.

My own view (and I am not saying anybody important shares this view) is that articles that are uniformly positive and about a person or entity that isn't demonstrated to be noteworthy (through, for example, the inclusion of independent external references) are presumed to be non-neutral. Bongomatic (talk) 17:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. &mdash; slakr \ talk / 19:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. &mdash; slakr \ talk / 19:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Article content and references
Hi Jike. Articles on Wikipedia are based on notable subjects and verifiable information. In order to achieve this, the information included needs to be sourced to references. Good references include newspaper and magazine article, and books. Articles that don't establish notability by including this kind of references, and articles whose contents aren't supported by references, are often deleted. Any questions? Post them here and I'll try to answer them. Welcome! Sorry I can't offer you any more cookies. But the ones you got look good. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)