User talk:Jim1138/Archive 1

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Rob Parker (sports journalist), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. -- Luk  talk 21:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hahaha sorry I went a bit too fast while trying to warn the offenders. I was trying to warn the IP below you :D. Sorry again! -- Luk  talk 21:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

"Stephen W. Burns Would you please put your information on talk:Stephen W. Burns? It really should not go in the article. That is definitely important to have Wikipedia accurate. I did note that his name is spelled with and "e" on IMDB. Thanks for your contributions! Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)" Both IMDB & Wikipedia are known for their many inaccuracies, but IMDB is more honest and humble about it. I gave you the sources illustrating the "Stephen" misspelling, which you are of course free to disregard, as is usual for wikipedia, which is why I usually disregard it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.248.246 (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Carolyn Jarvis
Vandalism on Carolyn Jarvis? What are you talking about? It's been part of this Wiki article for years that she used to be on "The Lofters", and it's a very well known fact, the show was viewed by tens of thousands of Canadians on the Life Network. All I did was reverse an edit by someone else, who for all we know could be Carolyn herself trying to hide her embarrassing past. I'll even add the reference if you insist to imdb and a youTube video where she is clearly seen. Carpet Crawler 2009 (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Huggle reversion
Hi, could you stop your reversions for a moment? I'd like to discuss a few. Prodego talk  08:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * So you reported two editors to AIV. One was . When you reported this editor, several of the edits you listed as vandalism, upon inspection turned out to be the IP correcting misinformation to the article . Another was where I cannot see how you determined their edits added false info. Could you please explain your actions in both of these cases? Thanks,  Prodego  talk  08:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I see, the first was huggle's fault (and someone else's mistake), while the second I do think you should be more careful about, but I can understand. Thanks. Prodego  talk  21:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Other users' Vandalism
Hi Jim,

Regarding this revision: and its user talk warning

Please be careful when calling other users' edits vandalism. In this case, the user (User:TheKingsq) is brand new to Wikipedia and their edit, while probably not helpful, does not really constitute vandalism. New users tend to appreciate gentle guidance and constructive encouragement while vandalism warnings are likely to make them stop editing. This user has even asked for help. It appears TheKingsq doesn't understand what the image caption should display but provided an accurate edit summary and even made an (admittedly misguided) attempt at referencing his revision. -- Carbon Rodney 17:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Home owners association
I have placed my views on the discussion page of the article. --IvarT (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * helpme eocsap — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKingsq (talk • contribs) 02:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It appears you are trying to get the attention of Jim1138 but you used the helpme template. When you use this template it calls everyone who monitors the helpme category to wherever it is placed. It is thus only for use when you want some third party to come by. By contrast, whenever you edit a person's talk page, that particular user will get an unmistakable day-glo orange bar at the top of every page they see telling them that they have new messages on their talk page, which persists until they visit it, so its all you need.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: January 2012
Hello, user Jim1138. Thanks for the reminder but as you can see, I did put the word "unexplained removal of content", only that I'm quite lazy (if that's my old bad behaviour) to keep doing this all the time. So I found a new way to revert back the previous user's edit, so I didn't notice that.

However, if you wish to know why I revert that, please see this: Talk:Arab_Spring. Everything can be discuss there. I reject what you quote me about "Your content removal does not appear constructive". You may not follow us but basically what I'm trying to do is I'm reverting illegitimate infobox to civil conflict with illogical arrangement of leaders and the party figures. And that this goes against the policy of WP:RS.

But as I need to say again, thanks for the reminding. 60.49.63.145 (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

LIST of EV Manufacturer
I tried to add a new manufacturer to this specific list of manufacturer of EV charger, however this is considered spam. I cannot understand why as this new line has similar content as the others (a short decription with a link to the webpage). Could you tell me the reason? Thank in advance you for your answer. Giubbolini (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Bids for the Sing-Out Song Contest 2011
Hey Jim! :)

Scratch the Speedy, I've given them the benifet of the doubt - AfD. Regards, -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 08:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

ISO on machine vision should REALLY refer to film speed and not the International Standards Organization!
ISO in context of machine vision refers to film speed and not a standards body! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.181.240 (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83.134.181.240#All_right--83.134.181.240 (talk) 02:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Gleniffer High School
Hi Jim, nice vandal patrolling. I must ask, how was the edit here not adhering to NPOV? -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 08:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Why on earth are you reverting my changes on my userpage?
The title is clear enough. Raijithetroll (talk) 02:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not revert without verifying
You have reverted my changes to The Oath of the Vayuputras page. The page was wrongly marked as a redirect to the first novel in the trilogy and I removed that to make an article for the page itself which refers to the third novel in the trilogy. Kindly be patient while someone is mending a page. Thanks Noopur28 (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Blocking Edits
Hi Jim,

Sorry about the previous edits! And quite frankly, labeling them as disruptive is offensive! I think the public needs to learn the truth instead of being brainwashed by what the media puts out as the truth. One more thing, one of the statements that was posted on the page Kashmir conflict was undoubtedly untrue--that was not a "disruptive" edit [I forgot what it actually was]. Oh, and one last thing: Can you send me a link of a free blog that I can use to give the real truth to the world? Thanks and I won't waste my time anymore trying to inform people of the real truth on Wikipedia! Sorry about not posting this in a message. I did not know how to do that.

173.224.98.115 (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)EternalTruth173.224.98.115 (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

No Problem
I had to change my name because the "troll" part that got me perma banned, and I logged in through my old user name, a stupid mistake. Thanks and sorry if I caused you inconvenience. Raijithetroll (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the page Michael Nutter
Hello.

I would like to kindly state that it appears that you have reverted my edit by mistake. Another anonymous editor had posted, according to the user "unverified and irrelevant BLP info", as well as other unverified information (see ). The (anonymous) editor had then reverted Drmies, apparently in bad faith. I had then reverted what I believed to be a bad faith revert.

Please let me know if you still believe I have done something which was not compliant to policy.

Thanks. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (Reply to message at User talk:75.53.212.214): Thank you. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

In regards to my change in the Battle of Mogadishu (1993) page, the final UN withdrawl was in March (1995) and not March (1994) you might be mistaken for the US Army Withdrawl date and is verified in many accounts and records, try and search for Operation United Shield where U.S. Marines were re-deployed by president clinton back too somalia to cover the UNs final withdrawl from the war torn region. As the the United Nations by then declared it a failed state or lost cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.162.148 (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Lalor talk
I had incorporated the relevant stuff and then archived it off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herestoree (talk • contribs) 10:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ) your quick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herestoree (talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

"Scott Pilgrim vs World"
I'm writing to let you know that I removed your G7 on Scott Pilgrim vs World and reverted to a redirection. Since other editors pointed out that the page should be made a redirection, G7 (which requires there to be only one significant contributor) does not apply here. Zzarch (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Hobbyfarm
I've blocked quail man for 48 hours. The edits seem childish rather than really malicious, so I've not imposed a longer block at this stage. With luck he will realise that there are sanctions, and reform. If not, the next block can be indefinite. Let me know if your unhappy with my action, otherwise it's just for info  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

user:Indiawale
Do you have more detail on what was pasted from usa.today ? Materialscientist (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its Ok, thanks. I was checking for copyvio before blocking him, couldn't find it (thus asked) and blocked anyway for edit warring. Materialscientist (talk) 05:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Bjornsonw
ThanksBjornsonw (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Katie Noonan Wikipedia Page
Hi Jim

Could you please advise why you changed my revisions to the Katie Noonan wikipedia page? I updated it will all correct and current information however you have reverted the page back to it's old state. Could you please advise ASAP.

Thank you Ellen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.154.177 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Archimede Morleo
If you want, i can sent you the link to download the illegal copy of the Bologna accounts. It just because i can't cite the real link. 210.6.84.49 (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

centre & harbour
Thank you for fixing my error. I honestly thought they were typos. my apologies. Thanks for clarifying promptly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narez (talk • contribs) 09:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for reverting my talk page! I really appreciate it! I will be really happy if you give me a banister! Have a wonderful day,Wikih101 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Snow Leopard
Hello Jim1138, How was saying BBC's videos are amazing not neutral — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoJaEpp (talk • contribs) 02:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh please quit it. You know very well what's going on. Calabe1992 02:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The fact is that it is amazing. How is that not a fact? I don't know of any one who would say it's not. Any ways forget it, its just a small edit. Thanks. JoJaEpp (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I need something to cheer myself up for working late into the night
Can you please give me a Beer for You, Cookie for You, and a Coffee for You? Also, I think I did a really good and hard job of keeping Wikipedia almost vandal free, so can you please give me some anti vandalism banisters including the The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar and other anti vandal awards and also a Happy New Year! banister. Sorry for the big request, but I really need something to cheer me up for working so hard. Have a nice day, Wikih101 (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Can you please just give me at least one?
Can you please just give me a barnstar or two at least please? I am pretty sure that others won't be suspicious if you just give me one or two barnstar. Thanks. Wikih101 (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I mean barnstar, sorry! :) Wikih101 (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I wasnt uncivil
Thanks for pointing me towards the civility page, but it seems none of it applies to anything I said. Thanks 74.132.152.205 (talk) 08:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
That was quite the opposite. User:Eraserhead1 (and you too) removed content from that page with no reason. I acted to add the materials back. 42.3.2.237 (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Legal financing industry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Editing of English Language
You sent me a message (User talk:194.197.118.196) reminding me of the rules regarding use of the english language, i had edited a page so the spelling said "centre" instead of "center". The rules state that if the page refers to an American subject, it should be American, and if English, then in English. The page referred to a battle in which England took part, therefore I changed the spelling to British English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.197.118.196 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Huayu-Huayu
Same editor reverted me 3 times on my talk page too. I've left a note at ANI. I get the impression he is one of those Taiwan nationalist pushers. I gather you're not an admin able to block him? You should be if not and I'd support your candidacy.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You reverted him three times, so did I!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Ridiculous - Taiwan nationalist, because I say Taiwan Dao means Taiwan Island??? Are you joking??? Huayu-Huayu (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Taiwan
You ask me to take the issues to talk Taiwan, but they are there already. Maybe you have been misguided by Dr Blofeld. He just reverted, removed content etc, without giving reason. See talk: Huayu-Huayu (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Talk:Taiwan
 * Talk:Taiwan

Hey
Do you like football :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey how are you today (talk • contribs) 05:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

United People's Democratic Solidarity
Thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I have rectified them. Please check out the page and see it meets Wikipedia's Standards. Kaitheloner (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome
Keep up the good work, cheers Kaitheloner (talk) 09:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Freon
sorry, i didn't notice your revert, and thought i didn't save the change Nikos 1993 (talk) 01:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Cody Ryan Ellis
Your A3 speedy deletion tag of Cody Ryan Ellis was not correct- A3 only applies to pages with truly no content, and the criterion actually lists what that means. The article in question had enough content to not be eligible for A3 speedy deletion. However, since no claim of importance was made, the article was deleted under A7.--Slon02 (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Shekhawat
Hi, thank you for your message. I would like to inform you that the information that I removed from Shekhawat was red links, personal information/address of individuals that are not notable as well as just plain personal opinion. If possible, can you undo your revert or clean-up the article yourself. I will greatly appreciate it. (69.112.78.110 (talk) 03:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC))
 * Thank you so much. I am grateful. (69.112.78.110 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC))

Thanks!
Thanks for helping out on my talk page. Rm1271  talkcontribs 19:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Nico Yennaris
Ah sorry .. I was just going by what was written in the article and wanted the cats to match. Didn't really bother checking the info. :D TonyStarks (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Gurjara-Pratihara
Hi, can you please help me, User:Yaudheya keeps reverting the edits of other contributors and mine without any explanation. Instead he constantly is adding his personal opinion, which  has POOR sentence structure, grammar, and spelling issues. Please can you revert his edit. I will go far to say this is vandalism. Thank you (69.112.78.110 (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC))


 * You could just revert the edits yourself, no? Additionally, I have left this user a caution against adding improperly cited materials. Feel free to add a user warn template (as found on WP:WARN) if you see any additional vandalism going on. ZZArch  talk to me 21:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for reverting User:Yaudheya vandalism User:Zzarch. As you can see from the 'edit history' of the article, I have been reverting his edits, but he reverts it day after day. I will guarantee he will come back in couple of days and revert your edit. As you will observe from this, this, this, this, this, this, and more. He has been edit warring with me and users: WikHead, Gurjeshwar, Themeparkgc, JSquish for the last month but he avoids edit warring by coming back in couple of days and reverting to his version. thank you (69.112.78.110 (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC))

Pixdev
Just realised I've wiped your changes when I added the templates at the same time as you - sorry! Jazzmista (talk) 08:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Tooting & Mitcham
Clearly you have not read the entire article as you would otherwise have noticed the ridiculously trivial nature of the whole topic. Furthermore, one piece of prior editing - which apparently made some genuinely knowledgeable observers laugh out loud - is so cleverly phrased that it has remained beyond the grasp of the self-appointed but improperly informed monitors of Wikipedia.

It is evident from your talk page that you have previously interfered unhelpfully in matters beyond your expertise; that is surely just the type of thing you are seeking so misguidedly to avoid !! I will once again restore the article and do not expect to hear anything further on the subject.

All the best, 90.199.27.242 (talk) 08:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh dear, hopefully you and the so-called JamesBWatson enjoyed your little sniggering session in the playground this morning. It's probably a good idea to avoid sarcasm though as this will most likely end in disappointment for you and your ilk. 90.199.27.242 (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Janice Mills in List of Australian artists
Hi. I'm not sure why you added this entry. It doesn't meet the notability guidelines because the entry itself isn't referenced; there's no WP article about the artist; and the account adding it in the first place appears to have a COI (since it carries the name of the artist in question. This really shouldn't be there. I'm going to remove it. If you think that's the wrong course of action, happy to discuss on the article talk page. But talk there before attempting to reinstate pls. Ta. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Tgeairn (talk) 06:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Anglian Bus
Jim - I believe you have undone my deletions of our page. I am not against this, but someone with a grudge (or just bored) keeps posting that our company is in administration. first posted 19 January & again last night 24 January. Last night they also deleted a whole range of our service information.

I have no problem if site is returned to pre 19 january version, but we can not allow someone to post lies about us. Is there anyway you can block revisions like this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.46.23.39 (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I just examined the page and there is no mention of the company being in administration. Manning (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

No, because I deleted it earlier today by undoing the change. The "administration" section was added on 19 jan - I amended yesterday to say this was not true & overnight the person who posted it changed it back again. I removed again this morning, but as they had also deleted the route information we decided it safer to remove all content. This is probably not the correct course to take, but limited time available to find out how to correct this & has at least put us in touch directly.

The route information used to start with service 001, but now only 601 onwards remains on site. Before 19 january we had no problem with the information on opage. can you rewind back to then?


 * Let's take the discussion here - Talk:Anglian Bus. Manning (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

RE: January 2012
The Reception is an [u]entire[/u] quote. Clearly you did not let that pass your review of the article, did you? Maybe you should familiarize your own self with the Wikipedia Rules, than maybe you would allow a positive change to the article that would allow the removal of the Over-quotation block on the top of the page. 68.160.206.157 (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Codyluva/Sandbox
Hi. I created the user as an alternate account for a demonstration of various ways to revert vandalism (I'd revert actual vandalism, but I rarely manage to happen upon it) and all the edits under that page (with the exception of yours) were done by me. I do know that the edit made under that IP was unconstructive. However, I guess that now I can show how an edit conflict works, since the edit window I opened to capture a revert is still open. :) - Purplewowies (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (replying to comment on my talk page) Eh, it's OK. I've added a note to the sandbox page saying that that IP (which I thought was dynamic, but I guess not) is supposed to be vandalizing the page so that someone who sees the vandalism might be less likely to revert it (any vandalism will be swiftly reverted by me or Codyluva, anyway). - Purplewowies (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Please see CSD, it is acceptable for the only major contributor of an article to blank the page, is not considered vandalism. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, it was Robert William Guthrie GimliDotNet (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

We all do it
Don't worry about it, we've all done [|done it before] GimliDotNet (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
For keeping an eye on my userspace :) I am impressed at how quick you are, you reverted it before I could--and I had the orange bar cluing me in! Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Overt Vandalism?
I wasted 2 hours of my life adding relevant and non-controversial content to an extremely outdated page... think 2005.

Immediately, some guy reverts the whole page deleting all my work... with absolutely no rationale at all.

Not beneficial to the page?

How is that even remotely possible?

Then, I am trying to figure out what happened and somehow you are accusing me of Overt Vandalism.

What gives?

This is the craziest thing I ever heard of... not really.

However, I feel like you guys sucker-punched me and left me for dead in the alley... with no rationale... only a random act of evil... that's how it felt to me.

I am happy to leave you guys to patrol over dead Wiki pages with 7 year old content.

Only the idealist in me always thinks that things like Wikipedia are not so sadly chaotic.

I probably even will get accused of something by writing this note to you.

Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mini4WD (talk • contribs) 05:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Solar Renewable Energy Certificates
Hi, thanks for undoing the User page edit. While you're at it, would you care to weigh in on the Solar Renewable Energy Certificates issue we're disputing? Thanks. Rostz (talk) 05:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Gay anthem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuck You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

William Crookes edits
Hi, Jim. I'm re-reverting the revert you made to Mr. Crookes article, after reading the message you sent to my current address. As this could be construed as rude, here's the explanation: I removed two links that pointed to a funeral firm page called "Survival After Death" where I was unable to find any work my Mr. Crookes, related (excuse me if I'm stepping on someone's feet) to a wacko guy that claims that Mr. Crookes gives scientific proof of life after death. I also removed a third link that claimed to point to a work related with Mr. Crookes (The Lost Letters of William Crookes) but that pointed to a description of the Cuban oceanic wire and only mentioned the title of the book. That edit seemed irrelevant to me, that's why I did not log in nor wrote an edit summary. I just removed two links that look like spam to me (the funeral services firm) and one irrelevant link (book only mentioned by title). However, after realizing you work with a bot that alerts you about "bulk" erasures made by anonymous users, I will from now on log in when erasing anything and write always a summary. If, after checking, you realize I'm mistaken and re-re-revert those references, I will not touch the article in any way, I trust in your judgment: there are no trouts in this creek. Keep the patrol moving and have a nice day! BTW, if you can edit this note so it doesn't appear side by side with your Patrol Badge, thanks, I was unable to do so. P.S. after removing again those three links I realized I erased by mistake a true link to "Diamonds" by Mr. Crookes, I just restored it. --Ciroa (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note, yes that was my address. I did not realize that the "talk" tab was the place to post notes to you, that's why I posted the previous note in your user page, sorry. As you can imagine, I do not send messages to users frequently. I will use the edit summary from now on, and probably every time I do so, I will be thinking about you trying to sort the many vandalisms you correct. Also, many thanks in the name of all Wikipedia contributors, from Colombia (that's where I live). I read below that not everybody appreciates your work (I wonder what happened in the article about Berkeley that needs First Amendment Rights and a lawyer! In Spain when a gypsy is angry with you, he says: "I'll see you among lawyers"). I guess God forgives you five years in Purgatory for every year you work in the Vandal Patrol.... :) (just joking). Again, keep the good work.--Ciroa (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)