User talk:Jim1138/Archive 2

My First Amendment Rights
My First Amendment rights extend to Wikipedia, as it is an American enterprise. If you people do not respect that, you will soon find yourself on the wrong end of a lawsuit. Thank you. Berkeley Deserves Better (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please stop embarrassing yourself and my city. Respectfully, a Berkeley resident. ZZArch  talk to me 01:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
ZZArch talk to me 02:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

God bless you
I was beginning to lose the plot there. Considering the hell on earth option. Thank you for being online.  fredgandt  06:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

ah
don't know how that got there, thanks! Paintedxbird (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Kristen Bell
I can't understand your reasoning behind deleting factual information on her family. I tell you I'm one of the Step Siblings, I uploaded pictures of us, what else do you need? This information used to be posted on here and last year someone delelted it. By the way, her 2 dogs names are Lola and "Mr.Shakes" not "Shakey". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avedianmp (talk • contribs) 09:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You failed to support this piece of information by a reliable source, and I am not sure if a listing of Ms. Bell's step siblings contributes much to the article as a whole. Please read the notices other editors left you carefully. Thank you. ZZArch  talk to me 09:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

What is a reliable source? Google her name with mine, Matt Avedian, and tell me how pages have our side of the family listed. If you're going to be short, and pick and choose which siblings to include, you should just delete all of the siblings. What do you need from me to prove I am who I say I am? What is a credible source for her family info other than a relative? Shall I scan my Driver's License for Wikipedia? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avedianmp (talk • contribs) 09:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Take note at WP:RS. ZZArch  talk to me 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Early 2012 Hong Kong protests
I think the redirection creator simply thought that the page was a duplicate to the one that s/he redirected to, while in fact I moved that page to the current one and did some heavy modification. Don't be too hard on him about it. Cheers! ZZArch talk to me 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

subst:uw-redirect1 does seem a bit harsh for a level 1  I'll remove the warning from his talk page. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Erroneous Intamin revert
I've undone your revert: Reverted edits by 92.40.56.170 (talk) unexplained removal of content (HG). Each of the 8 edits are valid and all have clear edit summaries. Please review and remove the warning from my talk page. Thanks. 92.40.56.170 (talk) 15:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. 92.40.56.170 (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
BigDwiki (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Huh
I already know those kinds of things. I have no relation to you and suddenly you send a message to me. Why you sent that message to me and not the other guy? I only keep Wikipedia's rules in place, is that so wrong? The rule is to keep existing format created by the author, NOBODY can change it due to their personal thing. What wrong with that? ༆ (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Banned user?
Hello, have you ever previous been banned from editing wikipedia? You writing style is similar to a banned user. Please explain. Sydactive (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Frankly, I see no such connection whatsoever, and unless you can provide credible evidence to your allegations, I will have to assume that this accusation is purely defamation in response to his reverting your edits. ZZArch  talk to me 04:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to set things right, it appears that the accuser is in fact a confirmed sockpuppeteer. At this point I would imagine it's okay to remove this defamatory accusation. ZZArch  talk to me 05:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppeteer
Actually, it was User:Jpgordon who did the investigations; I merely noticed his work afterwards. So you should definitely cast the thanks his way! ZZArch talk to me 10:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Page move
I've requested assistance at ANI to get that California page properly moved. That guy just doesn't seem to understand what speedy is for. Calabe1992 01:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Read one's talk page; really can help! Jim1138 (talk)

Money trail
Hi, need some help with Money trail. Some IPs, most recently 68.30.206.210, are determined to kill that chart. -72.37.249.60 (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It would seem that both sides have merit. You might want to talk to someone else.  Sorry Jim1138 (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Links
Can you please fix the links, since Wikipedia states that no such pages exist, whenever I click on them. Basically, they are "dead links." If you can't fix them, pleasae allow me to delete them, since I hate seeing links that don't work. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't believe me, try clicking on the links yourself. Like I said earlier, they are basically dead links. So, if you can't find a way to fix them (if that is even possible), please allow me to delete them, as the 2 links are making the bottom of the page look really messy, right now. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * By the looks of things, there is a technical fault, as the links to other language wikis were working a few hours ago Bruvtakesover (T&#124;C) 00:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I don't know how, but the links hae just been fixed. The reason why I wanted them deleted, was because they weren't working, and because they made the bottom of the page look messy. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Not for a lot of other pages. For example, if I saw it correctly, the Aus page links were working just fine. However, the South Pac's links were not. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I never saw a problem with the wp:interlanguage links. Glad you got the issue resolved.  Thanks for adding the citation to your last edit.  Jim1138 (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That's strange. My computer was unable to use those links, even though the links on the other pages were fine. As for the citations, it is something that I am working on. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If you go to the page 2011–12 South Pacific cyclone season, in the left column under "Languages" (you may need to click the arrow to show), you will see "Languages Deutsch Nederlands" Click on the link and you will be directed to that language version.  The ones on the English page take you to the foreign language page. Jim1138 (talk) 03:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

weasel words on the Prague Declaration.
Thankyou for your attention on the Prague Declaration page. I agree I worded my edit badly and in haste, and you were right to delete it. I would appreciate it if you would also monitor Tataral, because I keep having to modify his weasel paragraphs.Spitfire3000 (talk) 07:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid the only weasel words were introduced by you. Tataral (talk) 08:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Engagement marketing
Hello Jim, Thank you for your help on this subject. This was my first attempt at this. I hope the revisions that I made were correct.

Jody — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluewave Productions (talk • contribs) 08:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

UALR Page Vandalism
The same IP from last time, 99.121.96.73, has repeated the edits but now substantiated their claim with sources that verify their claims. Verified or not, however, their contribution is heavy with malice and negative bias. Quoting them here from talk:

Okay, the statements have been sourced and all the links work. Anyone care to argue that Oak Forest is NOT crime-ridden and filled with crack houses? Anyone care to dispute that the university campus is located in that area? Anyone care to dispute that Patricia Guardado was abducted from across the street and murdered? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.121.96.73 (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Though it is factually correct there is only ONE line of crime statistic per page on Wikipedia of the TOP TEN most dangerous universities in the country. This kind of information is slanderous and VERY atypical of content typically on University pages on Wikipedia. I'm considering removing the contribution. Your thoughts? Junipel (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

This I.P., 99.121.96.73, has vandalized the UALR page at least 3 times within the past week. Are there any steps possible to keep this from reoccurring? Much thanks! Junipel (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I would not consider that vandalism, but undue weight. I removed the safety block citing wp:undue Jim1138 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Much thanks, Jim. I realize now that it is not vandalism. Junipel (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— cyberpower ( Chat )( WP Edits: 513,228,387 ) 01:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

hello Jim I made somme changes on page "Senegal", forgot to mention my source this is my sources : http://allafrica.com/stories/201202031398.html How do I do to have removed your " Unsourced contributions notification" tks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamadou.mb (talk • contribs) 23:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Tour des feroes change info
hello sorry for move info two times from Tour des Feroes to Tour des Faroes and finish with [Tour of Faroes Islands] because the name was wrong, the version its in english and the name was in french and the first time wrong tiped, i dont know how change the name of the article please if u can send to me a link with help how can change the name thanks Wolfgang 7lsp (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Mudvayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

A happy ending
Great work in connecting those accounts. The result. Sunray (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Exeter vandal
Thanks for batting the IP vandalizing Exeter City F.C away from my user page. I am not holding my breath waiting for a lucid explanation from him on my talk page !  Velella  Velella Talk 23:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Gabriel Lawrence Sengol
I thought "enormously unhelpful" was no exaggeration. BTW, I looked around for sources but Google News and Books had nothing to offer; I found nothing besides that catholic hierarchy site, which I have used in the past and consider reliable. Maybe you'll have better luck. Thanks for cleaning up, Drmies (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * After scanning it, my brain froze up and did not know where to begin. I read the history and quoted you.  Hope that was OK!  Cheers  Jim1138 (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Wonder what I did to cause that? GoingBatty (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

IP 24.38.181.81
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Brian Boru is awesome. You have seen this same person under another IP before. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

"Skyward sword" article
Please delete the "Skyward sword" article. If not, have someone else delete it instead. Thank you for informing me. 98.169.110.135 (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Johnny Squeaky edits
At least one of Johnny Squeaky's edits was clearly out of line with its opinionated and inappropriate heading change, thus the NPOV warning. However no prejudice against discussion of what may be trivial or not at Talk:Greta Garbo. Dl2000 (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Raphaël Onana
Your addition to Raphaël Onana was removed as it was unsourced. Please see wp:rs and wp:citing sources for more information. Please add your content back with a good source. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes ! There is no problems for the reliable source, look the book on the work of Raphaël Onana.


 * 'Un homme blindé à Bir-Hakeim' : Story in french of a officer Cameroonians Who does the War of 39-45, France, Paris, Editions L'Harmattan, 1996, p 272 . (ISBN 2-7384-4239-0)

I have got this book and I copy in Wikipedia. The book is in french and it is not easy to translate in a perfect english. Can you help me ?

Thank you, you know, I'm french... I know the Onana family which I belong. I know Raphaël Onana because he's my grandfather.

You think it is forbidden to translate a french page in english ? People who speak English are entitled to know the status of Raphael Onana ... Also, I have cousins ​​who live in London .... I urge you to read this book before acting recklessly ... Please do not destroy this page that is the truth.

I find : I cannot source my own knowledge, and my information is more accurate than most of the information on here, that is the truth. Some of this information is not accurate, and i would like to add something that is. You have removed something I have wrote because you deemed it unsourced, but this is of my own knowledge. I can assure you this was not reckless and you are confused.

hurricane gloria
the information i removed from hurricane gloria was not accurate. hurricane gloria struck Long Island as a minimal category 1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds measured at 85 mph. hurricane gloria did NOT make landfall on long island with maximum sustained winds of 95-100 mph as said. gloria was not a category 2 hurricane at landfall, which winds of 95-100 mph fall under. my information is accurate. and yes i will convert the information from mph to mph and kmh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

hurricane gloria
ok sorry i was confused. yes i converted the information to mph and kmh. i have one other problem though. i am a weather fanatic and consider myself and expert in the field of severe weather. my editing to the 2011 new england tornado oubtreak was from my prior knowledge. i cannot give a source or cite my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Given wp:or, how would you resolve this? I am not accusing you, but many people place rumor, gossip, and outright lies on Wikipedia, so you can see the need for policy like this.  Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC

Yes I do understand and I do not wish to cause any trouble or spread any bias or inaccurate information. I am a fanatic when it comes to severe weather, and I do not know everything there is out there but I consider myself an expert. I am in the process of becoming a meteorologist. I live in the town of Springfield, Massachusetts and lived through the tornado. I have studied the scientific Fujita-Scale for years now, and know it by heart. I personally toured the damage in the town of Monson proceeding the tornado. The damage was indefinitely of EF-4 intensity, although officially confirmed an EF-3. The power of the tornado was underestimated by many, and it would be extremely helpful if people got the chance to realize its true intensity. This is simply of my knowledge. I did not find this information from any website, so I cannot possibly cite it or give it a source. It has come from my own knowledge. You have removed it because I have not gave it a source, but I cannot source it, it has come from my own knowledge not something found from a fathering website. I would greatly appreciate it if you did not remove it. Thank You.

Trouted
and 85 mph will convert to 137 kmh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Raphaël Onana
I'm agree to find more citations of my article. If I found, I take notes when I can. I'm alone in my article, it's not easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Ooh ! The text American Civil War is heavy to read ...! But I can understand what do you said. But my grandfather is not a legendary heroe... He's ordinary a man like you. From the American Civil War, it is very difficult to prove because there's not really photography pictures, no Movie-camera before the period 1861–1865... But in the world war II, it is more easy to prove by the reliabilityof the journalism after 1939, the start of the World War II. Warinhari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

user:Panoniann
He is also violated the 3 rever rule in transformer. Please block him too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bornder (talk • contribs) 08:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Social Security Act". Thank you.ChristianContributor (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Tricia Santos Fan Hoax Strike back Again
Hello!!

Another returning vandal of Tricia Santos with IP No 202.137.123.32 and 119.93.51.190. He or she create stories about Tricia but it is already a hoax stories. Can you extended to block this person again to prevent further vandalism stories. She is also candidate for sockpuppet. Tricia Santos is a former Teen PBB Housemate. How neither abs-cbn website nor pep.ph are not post about Tricia news of alleged inclusion of Teleserye or show of abs-cbn due to her attitude problem since during PBB Teen edition days. (talk) 04:27, 06 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.182.83 (talk)

Thanks!
Thanks for clearing my name, Jim! :) -- MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

uhhh
F*** that. People need a laugh or two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Okeyyyyyy :C98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Temple Run. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Have you heard of undoing it instead of being lazy and reverting'' it on Huggle? Not acceptable.''  J (t)  03:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you refrain from making incorrect reversions against Wikipedia policy. In regards to this edit, be aware that I indeed used an edit summary, and removed the content in a manner justifiable under Wikipedia policy. You, on the other hand, have added unsourced material to a BLP, some of which can easily be construed as controversial. I'd like an apology and a promise that this never happen again from you. Wikipedia does not need ignorant, trigger-happy patrollers. It needs sensible, careful ones. Please be the latter type. Very truly yours, 99.92.154.75 (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You are not welcome!
This is a sad place where nobodies live to enforce meaningless rules.--172.190.4.163 (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Humanities desk
I undid your reversion of this edit. It was a response to JackOfOz that does not violate any of Wikipedia's rules or principles; therefore, there is no justifiable reason for your revert. --140.180.7.220 (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ''Stop it. Look at the above messages.''  J (t)  13:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Removing messages
Jim, sorry for vandalizing some pages at Wikipedia but about the message you gave me, can I delete it? PatrickA.Tagle35 (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It is your talk page, you can remove it. Thanks for the apology.  Please do try to contribute in a constructive way.  Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The "Skyward sword" article
No additional Skyward Sword redirect page. Please delete and remove "Skyward sword". 98.169.110.135 (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Huggle problems
If you keep on reverting AGF without immediately apologizing I will report you. -- J (t)  22:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that harsh tone but seriously. At least get off of Huggle and get yourself to admit your mistake. -- J (t)  23:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * What is AGF and some specifics please. Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:AGF - if you don't know this your rollbacker rights should've been nulled. Specifics: IPs are ranting all about you; you don't immediately apologize, etc. -- J (t)  01:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The Roanoke Times
Hi Jim. I'm not sure about this revert of yours... the IP had removed an unsourced paragraph accusing the paper of "anti-white and anti-Southern news and opinion columns"... seems like that ought to be sourced or removed. 28bytes (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I reverted probably as the IP removed some sourced content and did not leave an edit summary. I agree with you on the politics section and removed it entirely.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it. 28bytes (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism on Article about Methodism in the Philippines
Hi Jim. I'm quite concerned about a lot of revisions happening in Methodism particularly that part of History of methodism in the Philippines. Edits contained vandalism and inappropriate language and citing some insults, in the other group. If my opinion counts, that would be a kind of discrimination. Isn't it? Are allowing it in Wikipedia? Thanks, Jim. Christian Eilers (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Editors who vandalize will get warned and if they continue, banned for various times. Sometimes pages seem to get targeted by a group, maybe through a chat room.  There is a loose network "vandal patrol" who keep watch on thing, though problems do get by.  The corrections you saw to Methodism were mostly vandal patrol.  If you are especially concerned about Methodism, please add it to your watch list and keep track of it.  BTW: are you referring to "Methodism" or some other article "Methodism in the Philippines"?  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I am referring to a section in Methodism. Thanks Jim. That is a lot helpful. Christian Eilers (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Blanked by creator
Re I have db-g7 tagged the page. It was blanked by its creator. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Huggle usually, but not always warns you about reverting a page blanked by its creator.  I removed my warning and apologized for my error.  Cheers!  Jim1138 (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Huggle noticed that the creator/blanker wasn't the only editor: someone else seems to have contributed as well, and the page was tagged for deletion —and refused— before. So, perhaps this isn't clear-cut after all. Let's see what happens :-) Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I have seen Huggle warn "properly" with other editors in the history. Also have had Huggle report a vandal to AIV without recording any warnings on the vandal's talk page.  Makes for some uncomfortable discussions with admins!  Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello! question?
Can I ask you a question on one side of wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ask away, I am here to help. I am about to sign off for ten hours.  Jim1138 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12 Please, remove this page. I do not know who created it. But they are fooling. This program was never aired on TV and never will. Someone is playing with Wikipedia. And it probably is not for fun? Please, if you do not believe check out the Polish side of Dancing with the Stars. Yours!
 * Would you please put your concerns on talk:Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12? That will get the process started.  There has been a considerable amount of work put into the page which is unusual for a hoax.  You might want to contact the page creator (click the history tab at the top of the page).  He is recently active and might be able to give you more information.  As this is an established article, the process to delete it is documented on Articles for deletion  I hope this helps.  If you have more questions, please feel free to ask.  Cheers!  Jim1138 (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I do not lie. The contribution is, I see. But it is all invented! This program was not! For example, Agata Kulesza, won the program but announced that he would never return to the program ... It is designed in ... Remove it. I know this person, who is doing it. Boy, age 14 Plays and creates tables that are unrealistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for Comment on the Berlin page
Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

You edited the PTC article
You undo my changes in the Paid to click article. The changes I made where totally correct and I even added references. I modified the article as per the information which exists today. I am in the PTC industry from last many years and I wouldn't like you to just simply make changes when you don't possess any knowledge about it. Kindly revert back the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nano245 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You scrubbed Paid To Click of well-cited source material criticizing PTC, added spam links supporting your position, and turned the article into an advertisement for PTC. No, I will not restore the page.  Please do not spam Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 19:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I didn't even added any ad links. I added the most reputed PTC site name. You can remove them and let the article be as it is. The information i added is true, the one you are telling is totally false. Please quote any proper reference. The references i am showing contain true information about this. You are just not using your brain. Respect wikipedia is a public encyclopedia. Everyone can edit them with correct information which I am doing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nano245 (talk • contribs) 12:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Business Week and Forbes are reliable sources. Click to Pay fraud exists.  You are welcome to add reliably sourced content.  If you remove reliably sourced content, your changes will be reverted.  By me or others.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)