User talk:Jim1138/Archive 20

jumping the gun
See subsequent edit. 68.175.65.114 (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Moved to IP's talk Jim1138 (talk) 11:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't the notice that most needs tweaking. I think the time and perhaps size parameters that triggered some notice (I am guessing) that you picked up. Those need tuning.

I think too whereas over the life of Wikipedia a lot outside of it has become simpler for the casual user, that (again, a guess) Wikipedia is increasingly imposing to the new editor. I don't consider myself a new editor. (I have an account from 2004.) But only if something is really compelling am I moved to find the minutia to do what I need to do. I think there should be a significant effort to make it simpler for new editors.

68.175.65.114 (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Trouted
You have removed obvious facts twice. Read WP:NONENG Shii (tock) 14:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Curious - I do not read Chinese; what does


 * 明日への葬列—60年代反権力闘争に斃れた10人の遺志 - 高橋和巳 編集、合同出版 1970年


 * mean? A Google machine translation produces:
 * "Full funeral tomorrow Prev column to 1960 Goodwill force Dou fight against death slightly ta ni 10 people Full behest - Takahashi and Pat compilation, published in 1970, the contract"
 * I am unable to make out anything that references a source. I notice that you added an additional cite to your edit which clears up my concern about a reference - thank you. I couldn't find anything on google by searching for "Chũnoshin Yui" or "Yui Chũnoshin" (in quotes), I did find that googling "Yui Chunoshin" (u instead of ũ) does return 220 hits, some of which seem pertinent. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It says something like "10 people who passed away in the 1960s antiwar movement." If you can't read a citation, ask the people who placed it instead of erasing it. Shii (tock) 23:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So, your Madalyhn Murry O'Hair edit had no reference, but according to you, was "obvious". The List of political self-immolations had an appearant reference in Chinese, but with no publication cited nor author listed - a useless reference, but then, "obvious" to you? Then you used the "racism card" with this revert. You did add a usable reference when you reverted. Apparently, not too obvious? Given that the non-English 'reference' was not a reference, WP:NONENG does not apply. Your claim that they were "obvious facts" is nonsense. Cite your sources like everyone else does. Stop expecting everybody to clean up after you. Thanks for the fish... Jim1138 (talk) 09:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The first reference was obvious because you could click William's wikilink to learn he is a minister (it's linked right there on the page). The second is a full citation, it contains a name, publisher, date, and title. Don't revert something that you don't know to be false, when you can ask someone to explain their sources instead. Shii (tock) 12:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

```Buster Seven   Talk  13:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Chinese Idol
(Bedco Chan (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)) Super Girls is another show but it is not related to the idol series. Also, Now there is a new version called Super Boys. Chinese Idol should be the first series of idol in China. If there are any wrong, tell me please !_!
 * When you edit, it would be very helpful to leave an wp:edit summary so that wp:RCP will know why you did the edit. Removals are often done because someone doesn't like that it is there, not because it shouldn't be. "rm Super Girls - not related to the idol series" would be informative. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

THANK You FOR REMINDING ME. !_! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bedco Chan (talk • contribs) 09:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia meetup
Thanks for attending the Wikipedia meetup. Hope that we can work together in the future on Wikipedia, and will see you at another meetup.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Unethical human experimentation in the United States
page 7 second paragraph of the google reference says six not twelve. check independently for yourself. 64.18.251.11 (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Please add information such as this to the wp:edit summary so that others can understand the what and why. I restored your content. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Mental Disorder
thanks for your edit. I thought a sentence describing and linking to another wiki article (the conditional cash transfer article) was ok. Have added some refs. JCJC777 I think none of the refs apply to mental health programs; shall I take them all out? JCJC777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCJC777 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Bookmarklet
I didn't remove anything I just wrap the code with anonymous function (function { ... }); because without it the bookmarket didn't work, (at least in Google Chrome). Article say that it can be wrap with a function in previous section. 83.144.78.146 (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

By mistake I change Safari to Safari, because I was editing Polish Wikipedia (adding example) at the same time and change it to polish version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.144.78.146 (talk) 10:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Mistake
No, didn't mean to delete that section. Thanks for changing it back!

Jb3141 (talk) 03:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi there
pls tell me what was wrong with the redirection of Booty article

Hello Jim1138, can you please tell me how to message you. I'm new to all this Wikipedia stuff, but I'm really enjoying it so far. I'll see you over on Louis Fenton's page soon. Cheers! Rictorious.

User.Yryriza/Pablo Picaso
I agree with you that displayed, or was on display is better, or even was on exhibit. I was correcting the popular misuse of "hung" more so than the choice of word that was picked.

TY
Thanks, Jim.]

bulldog
Hi.

You're accusing the wrong guy for edit warring, please pay better attention next time.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.185.111 (talk • contribs)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: Just delete "dirk dickbutt" it's obviously vandalism and should redirect to nothing. Wikipedia is full of rules nuts that make things too impractical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.123.230 (talk • contribs)

Clarification
Just to avoid any misunderstanding, I deleted the consideration for deletion; the page has already been deleted and there is no requirement to discuss whether it should get deleted or not. In the future, I will provide an explanation if I do this, so thank you for alerting me. For your information, I created that page and wished to delete it, because the issue was not relevant anymore.

Thanks.

Chloe's Closet Season 2 Is Real
Chloe's Closet Season 2 Is Real. Carys Mozart Is Real.

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Why did you delete my comments on capital punishment in Australia I am Julia Gillard the Pm of Australia

Colby College
you should stop editing Colby College because you have no knowledge of it. thank you for your compliance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banachukaroojleasoutszu (talk • contribs)

editing on a page you messaged me about
I have documented proof that what I edited was approved by a court of law. The persons page I was editing continuously lies about a relationship that never happened for the purpose of reckless attachment. Its all a media ploy. Zero factual evidence supporting her claim. So, moving forward, as she adds her lies for the media, I have the right to delete them. Also, there is no difference between her posting fake marriage information that NEVER happened, and the links of bad press describing her personal life character of being a snake and media whore. Slander is not something taking lightly on the internet in 2012, almost 2013 and she is 100% slanderous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.112.64.32 (talk • contribs)

Carolyn Jarvis Wikipedia Edits
Hi Jim,

I would love to work with you on editing the Carolyn Jarvis Wikipedia page. I am very new to Wikipedia so thank you for your patience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Samanthajayne77/Carolyn_Jarvis

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE You do not even go to Northland College therefore you do not know anything about it. Therefor, you are unqualified to undue any change due to your lack of knowledge. Our focuses have slightly changed and some information already on the site was inaccurate.

Joanna Clapps Herman
Hi Jim. I created a Wiki article for Joanna Clapps Herman back in July. It was deleted because she was deemed not notable. I was hoping I could try again, I found some additional citations and believe it could add to her notability, especially as an Italian American woman speaker/scholar/ creative writer. Can you give me some advice as to how I can try again? Thanks so much! Srdemuro (talk) -Sam

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE

Because you reversed an edit on the Daniel o Donnell page, An area you abviously have no knowledge of. Daniel O donnell is considered embarrassing by young people In ireland and is often referrred to as a gombeen, A little research on your part might have helped. SOmetimes in being FACTUAL it is not possible to be nuetral,

Stop sending messages that don't apply to me
Hi Jim Why am I calling you by your first name, I've never even met you not to mention even know you. I notice you left a message about an edit even though I don't have a Wankapedia account. This computer was obviously used by someone else to make an edit therefore I don't need messages from you or another Wankapedia social outcast. Please desist. William — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.231.10 (talk • contribs)

Balija
There are a lot of wrong quotations on the article Balija, which is a major Telugu speaking Hindu caste. Books written by authors belonging to other castes, other religions sometimes would be insulting to Balija caste. So when I removed some quotations, lines on Balija caste page, there was a reason since these references were derogative to my Balija caste / community. For a Hindu more then religion, the Caste to which one belongs is more important since the caste/community tag adds prestige. Please kindly understand our sensitivities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.250.71 (talk • contribs)

Question
--waAAAAAsup mr jimbob.lemme tell u this wikipedia stuff is awsome it is like facebook on steroids.... i would like you to explain stuff to me better and we could chat.this stuff about ppl changing my corrections is stupid,obviously they have no clue what they r saying,talk to you soon and keep me posted... yale brain baby — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.204.228.126 (talk • contribs)

Re
Thanks, mate. I didn't realize.

Merry Christmas


Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Fugitive
I had made a number of constructive edits with proper citations to the page in a single edit. The user TheOldJacobite, deleted all of my additions and reverted the page without a proper explanantion. This user then begins to insert some of my improvements to the article one by one. I'm not engaged in an edit war. I'm entitled to make improvements to an article with properly sourced citations. The user TheOldJacobite insists on reverting the page back to an earlier version that contains few, if any reputable reliable sourcing. He then attempts to add my additions one by one. I haven't done anything wrong. He should be given a warning for edit warring. Moovi (talk) 02:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC

Avo
I apologize that this is in the wrong place, I didn't know where to put it, but it came to my attention that you removed my edit about 'Avo'. I added a small amount of information, but it was from a reliable source. Please consider searching up 'Team Avolition' in google, and removing your warning level on me. - SergeeIsBigHakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by SergeeIsBigHakes (talk • contribs)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE

List of LGBT characters in television
The reason why I removed Dean Winchester from the list is because he is not bisexual. After 8 seasons, they would've given us at least a hint of bisexuality coming from the character. I do not believe it is correct to insinuate something like that, and misinform people, even if it is said unconfirmed, only because the bromance between him and an other character is so highly exaggerated by a big part of the fandom. That is all. I really recommend you to remove him from the list again, as it would be the most rational thing to do.

UOCC Content
The section entitled The Arrival in Canada of "Patriarch Filaret" has no business being on the UOCC wikipedia page. The people who post this are an upset minority involved in mad slinging. This section needs to be deleted. So kindly so restoring this section to the UOCC wikipedia page. Secondly this does not cite any references or sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.174.174.246 (talk • contribs)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Most rediculous site. Same old propoganda and any truth edited out by moles.

Sorry.
Sorry Jim1138, wasnt thinking

Trouted
You have been trouted for: no reason. I just felt like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguinsruleman (talk • contribs)

new article HOWARD MOSS (Musician)
Hi Jim1138,

Hope you can help me as I am on a learning curve.

Irish singer songwriter Howard Moss is well known in Europe & has had significant chart success. He has a new album out now of original songs. Hopefully he'll become famous in the States too.

Is the article okay? Please can you develop it further?

references official Irish charts found on http://irishcharts.ie/search/placement

Title: DELILAH Artist: HOWARD MOSS Label: TEL Date of entry: 29.06.1995 Highest Placement: 11 Weeks in the Charts: 5

Title: SALLY FORTH (EP) Artist: HOWARD MOSS Label: TEL RECORDS Date of entry: 02.06.1994 Highest Placement: 18 Weeks in the Charts: 1

kindest regards, stevieweymarkStevieweymark (talk) 11:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

reply
hi jim, I got a strange message from you, it writes "Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)", just want to let you know I never made any comment on the whole wikipedia. regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by MP4-23 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * IP addresses are not necessarily permanent and may change. So, someone else made that edit on a different computer and you later got their old IP address as well as the Wikipedia history. Looking at the history of the page where that edit was made: Red Pen of Doom, it appears that an "IP hopping vandal" was "attacking" RPOD, vandalizing his page 212.183.128.59 here then getting blocked here 212.183.128.59 another edit here: 212.183.128.120. And, others as well. Veteran editors are familiar with IP changes, so I wouldn't worry about it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Cheers Jim, now I got what happened, maybe because I was using university computer by that time — Preceding unsigned comment added by MP4-23 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

wrong IP
Never made any reference to Abe Lincoln and religion anywhere on Wikipedia, you've got the wrong guy sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.131.237.153 (talk) 09:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

VON LMO's birthday
VON LMO was born on March 10, 1952! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottovr93 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * What's your source? Please read reliable soucres and citing sources. Wikipedia needs to be verifiable as anyone can edit it. People want to verify information, hence the verifiablity requirement. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * November 2012? Took awhile to reply! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I might ask the same of you, because whatever your source, it is wrong - so, yes, where was that bogus birthday published? I know Frank Cavallo aka VON LMO and am currently playing in the same band (Avant Duel) with him, have played with him on and off for over 45 years and exchanged birthday gifts with him over many of those years. I stand corrected - it is March 10, 1951 (my wife is born on the 22nd of March, 1951 and for some reason I have always thought she was older than him, but apparently not. My source is VON's (Frank Cavallo's) NY State Identification Card of which I possess a digital file - how do I send this to you or post it into this Wiki document? Ottovr93 (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Posting an image of someone's ID on Wikipedia would likely be frowned upon Personal information. In following with Wikipedia policy, the birthday should probably be removed. May I suggest that you either delete the birth date with an wp:edit summary of "No source for birth date", or change it as you believe it to be with an edit summary to the effect of personal knowledge as a friend. I won't undo it, though someone else may. Thanks for your note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

What I was trying to do
This site is so confusing. It said disruptive editing on the site, I'm not sure that you wrote those words.

Now my website is blocked.

I began a nice little page on limogesboxes and put a link to my sites markings. The markings page is now on a blacklist Could you please unblock my page limogesboutique (dot) com and just put a nice little link to the markings page so people could see all of the limoges markings. I also wanted to expand on the information. The reason I took content down is because it mirrored content on my website and when I first started this I did not realize that mattered.

Also my competitors limogesboxcollector.com kept deleting my links and putting in links to their webpages for advertizing. back and forth and back and forth. In the end the whole thing got blocked and I could not finish the page when I sat down to finally do it.

This whole thing has been annoying. I was trying to write an article with a link to my site that showed the limoges markings. And it turned into a advertizement war. Why they cant write a page of their own I do not know. I just was making a page with a link to That information use to be on another link, but I have since rebuilt the website.

As you can see very relevant content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.96.242.159 (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Are you Miraluck or someone else? Please try to make it easy to communicate. Per wp:linkspam, links websites with prices generally do not belong on Wikipedia. I don't see why limogesboutique.com should be an exception. You (and others?) persisted in adding the link to Wikipedia after warnings, so it was blacklisted. If you want to link to that information from Wikipedia, I would suggest creating a new web site that is non-commercial then linking Wikipedia to it. Be sure to maintain its non-commercial status. If it changes, the link would be removed. Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Russians in Korea
Thanks for your message about why you removed what I added to "Russians in Korea". You mentioned that I didn't have a source about the Russian prostitutes in Busan. In this case, having lived in Korea for three years, my source is myself having been approached by Russian prostitutes and offered services in Busan. Can I use myself as a source? Thanks Jim. -Jeff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrs1040 (talk • contribs)
 * Unfortunately not. Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. Using your own knowledge is considered original research. As Wikipedia is edited by many, some check the references to make sure it is reliable. You will not always be available, so it needs to be written down and vetted as reliable. For info on sources see reliable sources. Also, people add things from rumor and just make stuff up to be funny or to vandalize. If you can find a news article, book, or some other source, please add that source with your edit. See wp:cite Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Eason Chan
Hi JIm

I just went away to get the reference for the Eason Chan entry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.69.201.60 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Peg Entwistle
Hi, Thanks for looking out for Peg's page. You are of course correct that she was English. I am EXTREMELY and intimately close with Peg's biographer. His book "Peg Entwistle and the Hollywood Sign Suicide: A Biography," is being published by McFarland & Company and is due for release later this fall. However, it is now available for pre-order at Amazon. Just keyword "Peg Entwistle." Or, you can go to hollywood sign girl.com to see more info there.

Also, I notice that the drive-by editors who like to keep calling Peg "Welsh," also alter their I.P. Address to mask their location....I always wonder about such things. Well, I'm off to the Sign to have some time alone with my thoughts of Peg. Have a nice day, Jim1138. 169.232.212.26 (talk) 22:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I added a hidden comment about nationality in the info box. Might help a bit. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Editing
Get you facts right. I didnt edit anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.145.156.177 (talk) 07:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

you maked a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.161.215.177 (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

hey, no its cool, I was gonna change it back as I was only doing it to wind up my mate who supports Southampton (I'm a Portsmouth fan) no malicious intent or anything :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.152.227.7 (talk) 10:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

sorry that was a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.110.251.154 (talk) 11:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Kugel Ball
Jim,

I saw that you took down my addition to the list of locations of kugel ball fountains. I don't know how to correctly format it, but there's a very well known Kugel ball fountain located in the meditation garden at Numen Lumen Pavilion at Elon University in Elon, NC. Could you help me submit it to list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.33.61.219 (talk) 17:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I fixed the formatting. Please don't leave things 'broken'. I also added coordinates. I see google nor bing maps show the pavilian. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back
Glad to see you in action again :) Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Bob Chance obituary
Source for Bob Chance obituary: http://www.dailymail.com/News/201310090180 76.188.14.80 (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Tiger v Lion
I accepted the removal of some content with the explained reason of unreliable source...the source is a blog. You replaced it. I have again accepted its removal. FYI Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Reply to Jim
Jim, I dont understand why all of you are erasing so much information, the links I send in are credible, so you have no reasons to erase them, if you feel its garbled as you stated, then look into it and make the proper corrections, not to mention that is based on a poor, bias and incorrect asumption, since it was quoted word for word, so you had no means of erasing it since I already provided two links to its root artcile on google news.

terrell jacobs is credible along with clyde beatty whom you've erased as well, I showed there links, sources and quotas from reliable places such as google books and google news.

I have a big problem with this page of lions vs tigers...

That wiki page is not called the most extreme weights of the largest tigers (Sub-speices) vs the low averages of lions, no, its titled lion vs tiger, (as in speices vs speices) this is not a chetty picking contest or forum, so that means all sub-speices must be combined to reach a average weight, this page is a contradiction to what it already has as the overall tigers weights which is 160 kg is the average tigers weight as for their speices. As do almost every source that sumed up these animals of:

http://books.google.com/books?id=XFIbjBEQolMC&pg=PA54&dq=lion+tiger+160+kg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EDBXUpjHKa_wiQLvjIHQCw&ved=0CBMQ6AEwAA

Not to mention this site has only pro tiger data, since on numerous occaisons credible accounts of lions killing tigers have been posted, google news archive already has over 20 individual cases, yet this wiki page has been up for over 6 years, an not one can find its way here? C'mon this page should be over hauled and deleted if its not going to up-hold the guide lines of wiki, at this point its a forum where tiger fanatics can come on and with hundreds of aliases self moderate and erase anything that favors the lions behalf, since it already has been done, its ridiculously easy to see, since examining the 1909 occaison on multiple news archives shows the lion named Prince dident even die, yet for years wiki has been emiting in 1909 a tiger killed a lion.

Having millions of people quote wiki, so that means millions of people have been lied to, shame on wiki with its half ass moderating.

It even witholds information, since the tale of pompeii stated the mosaic was of a lion standing over a prostrated tiger, yet it links the book that witholds that informatiion, not the one where it was excavated. Majority of the quotas backing the tiger aint even checked by any accord, yet it states no (citation needed) yet it can remain for years? While anything of the highest credability favoring the opposite gets constantly erased with false acusations, even if its real.

Thats not what wiki is supposed to stand for, we need facts or reliable sources, none of which stands is even reliable, since none of what was writtem is even showing up in the external links.

This site for over 6 years has been moderated by kids, and fanatics, basically making wiki a giant seacrh engined propelled by lies.

You know what, I wont bother already, I'll follow up on this else where and include a detailed summary of how retardedly idiotic this site is in providing facts, you can leave it in any bias way you see fit, I'll just make an exploitation list and expose this bias site later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.150.155 (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

UGH
U SSSUCCKKKKK WHY DID YOU REMOVE MY EDIT UGGHHH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.44.12.192 (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2013 (UTC)  Shut up

I am sorry please don't block me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.168.195 (talk) 02:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Removing My Edit
Hi, I am sorry, I am new to editing. I have proof of what I added. The source is myself, I don't know if this counts. I am asking to get it published in a news article somewhere. What would be considered a reliable source and proof? I thought I added some. I know I am new, and am sure there is more to what I need to do. But I want to do that, show what I am writing is 100% factual, and have it part of the article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthSpeaker85 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability. Content needs to have a reliable source. As anyone can edit, people want to be able to look up the sources. Using your own knowledge is called original research and is discouraged. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I hear ya now, totally understandable. Otherwise anyone can say this happened, and it could be taken as fact. W/O guys like you this place would be filled with both misinfo and disinfo. I have contacted a few news outlets, I will let YOU know how that goes, I am looking to get it published, once I do I will re-edit citing the source. It will be a reliable source, or news outlet. I will also provide further documentation as well. Your not saying you don't believe what I'm writing, just that it needs to be confirmed by a reliable 3rd party source (unbiased). Thanks for clearing it up, will read up a little more, push this issue, and get the article edited correctly.

-TS85

Jesus
Thanks for informing me, honey. I appreciate your work for the betterment of wikipedia. The statement that jesus is masih in Islam is almost like a universal truth just like the statement that jesus is a prophet in Islam(it also has no refrence). There are uncountable sources that prove this fact, so I avoided adding refrence for convenience. If you are not still satisfied, then i will add some reffs. thanks dear.Leopetra (talk) 09:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing, and there is a mistake on your userpage
Hi Jim! First of all, thanks for reverting vandalism, I really appreciate that! Secondly, your userpage states 'states lived in', with American states. That implies you live(d) in the USA. However, 'countries lived in' does not state so. Mistake? :P

Greetings! Jarvix (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I presume that you mean it is rather USA-centric? I reworded it to be somewhat less so. I lived in Maharashtra state while in India. I don't think Bougainville Island had states. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)