User talk:Jim1138/Archive 27

Energetically Modified Cement
I saw your comments regarding COI and I am sorry to trouble you.

I can assure you, I have no connection at all with EMCs. I am simply bringing the level of the page to a higher standard of science with my background in material sciences. This page lives with the facts that the discovery of the technology is connected to one university in Sweden and the process became patented. In order to bring balance, there are no explicit references to the company (other than its official website) or any patent. There is even no reference at all to the process even being patented.

Before xmas, a user called maproom made a number of comments regarding the need to establish more about why the process yielded the improvements documented. Another user voiced the same concerns. As a result I spent about 10 hours writing about concrete chemistry. It then turned out maproom did not know the difference between cement and concrete (that's fine, and hopefully he learned something). After the extensive content about concrete chemistry was added, the second user stated they were satisfied with the changes made.

After about 2.5 months "silence" the latest raft of criticisms started. Again centering that the page did not explain the process. I made further edits. Then, the user Karl (who account shows intense activity virtually only on this page) started making a number of assertions which are just completely "off the scale". There is no need to even begin taking the comments because it is obvious that anyone with a sound grounding in material science would not raise these issues. Some of the accusations made have been simply outrageous. But i do not have the time to answer them. It is simply too distracting and time consuming.


 * In time, Karl's comment have become more extreme. In particular he has made statements about Ronin being a "director" of the company. I do not know this. But when I ask where is this stated, he says "on the website". But it isn't. I have searched the website now three times. When asked to show where it is stated, he then states it is stated in PDFs available from the website. Well, again I have looked - and this is not evident either. I cannot find a single PDF.


 * He then makes comments about EMCs being Portland cement. This is absolutely not true.


 * Then he states that "the Australians did this first". I ask him several times to back this up so that it can be considered and if necessary included on the page. But he never responds.

The entire tone, lack of precision, unsubstantiated assertions leads me to beleive he is connected to the Portland cement industry. Or, may be he has a bad experience of working with Ronin. It is all very odd. Why I wonder if Karl is in COI.

I want to add there are solid technical reasons as to why there is only a certain "level" to which I am prepared to explain the "EMC Activation" process. This is nothing to do with my lack of understanding the subjects involved in order to provide an explanation. I could do this. But, it is simply that beyond a certain level, one is in danger of crossing the threshold into original research. And I am very concerned that because of this limitation, users who do not understand the restrictions on original research will keep requiring the unwritable. As it is, today I have sent three hours wring on the tribochemical background giving rise to the theory behind the process. But, there are legitimate limits imposed by Wikipedia itself regarding original research.

Thank you for reading this if you did

Kind regards

23:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.66.81.80 (talk)

Misguided lecturing
Are you seriously going to delete my calling out someone for making false and insulting statements about me, but not delete their false and insulting statements about me? And lecture me about it?

I wouldn't mind a bit if you deleted my response to incivility if you also deleted the incivility I responded to. Otherwise, your lecturing is either misinformed or misguided. Lockean One (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Lockean One@undefined You are giving me generalities with no specifics. A cursory view does not seem to support your claim. Jim1138 (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * LOL, I won't be wasting my time obliging you there since barely more than a cursory view is all it would take to see what I'm referring to. Lockean One (talk) 02:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

No thanks on the help
Jim, thanks for trying to be helpful, but no, I do not actually need your help. I made an appropriate edit which was incorrectly flagged by another user as vandalism. That does not mean I need a giant, colorful box of links to help topics on my user page. I am learning a lot about the culture of Wikipedia, though, and the tendency for people to try to help so quickly that they end up being less than helpful in practice. No need to add any more links, graphics, or generic advice to my user page in response to this.! Claudiaalismaki (talk) 04:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Claudiaalismaki@undefined It's your talk page so you are free to remove most anything. People who feel the need to communicate with you (within reason of course) are allowed to post there. See User pages for info on that. If someone requests a citation, you should provide one or discuss why it's not needed. BTW: that's your "user talk page", your "user page" is here: user:Claudiaalismaki Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I understand that people are allowed to talk there, and I never said you aren't allowed to. I can't figure out a way to remove the thing you added at the top and would rather it not be there. So I'm hoping you will honor my request not to insert anything like that again. Thanks for understanding. For clarification, the user that reverted my edit did not request a citation. It's not really helpful to get advice that doesn'thave anything to do with the issue at hand. Claudiaalismaki (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Claudiaalismaki@undefined You can either click on "View history" at the top of your talk page and click "Undo" on my edit, or you can edit the page, select what you don't want, (everything if you wish), delete it, and save the page. If you wish, I can remove it for you. A primer on editing can be found here: Help:Editing Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

please create info on Alan Strong
please submit info on Alan Strong of the Georgia Fire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrong1 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

i want to edit internet protocol suite but i am not able to add images in this... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.16.61.188 (talk) 10:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
I am really thankful to you for reverting vandalism on article Lancelet. Dear fellow I am really really worried about biology section of wikipedia becoz few users have interest in it and they be easily vandalized. Please put as much biology articles as possible under your watchlist including Pinacocyte,Pinacoderm, choanocyte, Choanoderm,Ostia(Sponges).Septate (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

User management
Hi Jim1138,

About the user Ijggak, my user (I created it), I just wanted to remove it or, at least, remove the data what I have written as a description. Could this be performed, please?

If not the user removed, at least, removed the data.

Thanks! 79.150.251.138 (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Poem of the man God
Before deleting POMG I recommend you read it to see if it is valid. Thank you for your careful consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.126.249.33 (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Salvatore Cuffaro
Dear Jim,

Can you please PROTECT the article on SALVATORE CUFFARO. It is being repeatedly vandalized by CIVA. I have reverted his last changes but he keeps vandalizing it. CUFFARO is a convicted criminal and he is spending his time in jail for mafia association. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

JIM,

The vandal has put in the infobox at the voice profession : politician and doctor ( not former politician, and as for the doctor cuffaro has been expelled from the medical order)

I am feeling bored and disapponted by all this... you know what... maybe let's the mafia have their way. ( in the end who cares about having a correct an unbiased information ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In wikipedia Italy accuse me of being against Cuffaro, here in favor. Just as well...--Civa61 (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Jim, you have nothing to apologize, CIVA is well known in italian circles together with other people of the so-called wikimafia.

Anyway you might have noticed that the above mentioned guy has just deleted the conviction charges.

Cuffaro has been definitely convicted by the Supreme Court for aiding and abetting the mafia, and that sentence is final (2011). The sentence from (2012) in a lower court and another trial refers to the application of the principle of "Ne bis in idem" to the effect that no legal action can be instituted "twice" for the same cause of action, Cuffaro beign already convivicted for the very same facts could not be tried and convicted again in another trial for the same facts. ( ne bis idem). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Civa will be well known but not spear mud, and hides behind an anonymous. --Civa61 (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Jim,

I must confess I am a bit tired. And as I have mentioned before I know for a fact CIVA has not even the remotest intention of improving on the article but just "blanking out" essential parts related to Cuffaro's criminal history. I think CIVA should be at least temporarily blocked from doing further edits on this specific article, and possibly from all mafia related articles.

You might have noted all his edits with no exception on this specific article are aimed at "embellish" the matter of fact that Cuffaro is a mafia convicted guy, kinda sprinkling a bit of "sugar" here and there, omitting data and giving misleading information. Let's see what I can do to straigthen the record. Jim can I also contact you privately by mail ?

PS. I am not so much into wikipedia technicalities, like "pinging" an user and so on, the reason why I am not involved in this project is exactly due to these italian wiki-mafia, guys like CIVA, tampering against any objective data. It is awful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 (talk) 21:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

CIVA : PROBLEMATIC USER
Jim, as I told you I am not into wikipedia technicalities.

As you might have noticed I stopped editing on Cuffaro's article even if in its current state it is missing key data due to the intervention of CIVA in order to avoid further confrontation with that disgusting individual, but I would like at least to report him as a problematic user.

May I ask you what is the procedure to report CIVA as a "problematic user" ? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Truly those who is a "problematic user" in wikipedia.it and blocked it was 88.195.245.13 . --Civa61 (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Plone cloning question
Phone cloning allows you to find out information about anybody if you can steal their phone for a few minutes in order to clone the sim. (Example, forgetting your phone in your car, then the bad guy uses a slimjim to unlock you door and copy your sim.) Once you have the sim cloned you can listen to other people's voice messages and SMS by cloning their sim? true or false? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.205.112 (talk • contribs)

I know. I tried to make it a link, but it didn't work.Dance3600 (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

She wolf(falling to pieces)
The change of genre is obvious y don't put any neutal point I only put the predominant hpgenre in the song — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewbf (talk • contribs) 06:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600705129 your edit] to Thirty Meter Telescope may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * |built       = planned (est. completion 2022)  [http://www.latimes.com/science/la-me-uc-regents-20140321,0,2913286.story#axzz2wfj61rsk LA Times UC
 * * High precision (~0.01 arcsecond) astrometric imaging and ( 0.001 arcsecond) astrometry at near-infrared wavelengths (1.0–2.5 μm)

need your help in editing
Dear Sir/madam I made a mistake in editing a page. Actually what I wanted is to create the content of new page titled as welfare computing and the content as follows. I made a mistake in editing the page. Could you correct it for me please. Because I am new to this editing. resently a small trend to develop this field in japan. Thanks in advance.

Welfare Computing is interdisciplinary research division of computer science that relates to welfare industry and related machatronics design problems — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasantha samarathunga (talk • contribs) 08:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Wasantha samarathunga@undefined I have been busy and don't know what you are referring to. There is nothing in your editing history that would give me a hint. Signing off shortly. Jim1138 (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Weigh in on discussion?
Hi. Would you care to weigh in on this discussion? It concerns whether a particular review quote should be removed from an article. Dan56 (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Article section abuse
Hello

Yesterday I disputed an article's section (PIA: Fleet) which kept getting abused. I put 'dispute' in section and made an edit on talk page of PIA at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pakistan_International_Airlines, listing abuse section. The abuser, Naveed245, keeps abusing fleet section of PIA article. He is not referencing his edits and over riding my edits, which have references. Moreover, he makes multiple edits every time which makes it hard for me as i can't undo, and have to redo section manually every time. I'm citing official website and news article from reputable press.

Please tell me what to do. He removed the dispute warning from artivle and did not reply on talk page of PIA under dispute section. I tried to look up his edits to see if i can provide references (thinking he may be right), but he's getting those info from an unoffical-fan created PIA facebook page. Thus, it has ample of uncited and false info.

I tried to warn him many times, left message on his talk page. I tried everything possible i know of, but he won't give up. I checked his edits on other artivles, where he also posts uncited and false info (e.g, Malaysia airline crashed in south china sea when it hasn't been confirmed).

Article in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_International_Airlines Section: Fleet Talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Uabbas92#Pakistan_International_Airlines Section: Dispute

Uabbas92 (talk) 04:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Jim1138@undefinedThanks for reply. Am I doing something wrong? I don't want to get banned as the purpose of my edits are to give actual info than preferred or rumored info. I had left him message on talk page, but no response.

So should I fix article or leave it as-is (with wrong information)? If i fix it, the next day he'll undo it and I'll have yo repeat process again.... Uabbas92 (talk) 04:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Jim1138@undefinedI think Naveed is doing The three-revert rule thing. He should be banned for 24 hours? He did 4 edits under 24 hours... Accidentally I did the same trying to fix the vandalism.
 * Uabbas92@undefined No need to ping me on my own talk page. I would recommend staying away for a bit. You shouldn't have to worry about a block. I would recommend putting an invitation to discuss PIA directly on Naveed's talk page. Also, ping Naveed every time you leave a message on talk:PIA. Take a look at wp:dispute resolution to familiarize yourself with the process. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Jim1138@undefinedHe did it again.. I want to talk in dispute, but he keeps removing dispute banner nor replying on talk page. He's not responding to my messages... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * {{@|Jim1138} So I followed your advice. It was not the right one. My dispute was closed and I was referred to yet another place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Naveed245 is where I opened dispute about user conduct. Now it requires both parties to respond. HE DOES NOT RESPOND! God's sake man. I am trying to do the right job here, giving citation and I have to beg the guy to come and talk on PIA page, leave messages on his page, get mods to get him to communicate. If he's not interested and CAN NOT follow the rules (no edit summary, no citation, ruining undo option), why do I have to jump around and do the right thing? So much for democracy at wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Naveed245 . Please sign the page. I need two people to sign in total. Naveed won't sign... Also detail what you've done to get him to resolve dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Time Zone
What time zone does Wikipedia use? I ask because I though for sure that wikipedia was an american site, but according to the time stamps in my edits, it's already the 15th somehow? BustaBunny (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC) BustaBunny@undefined I'm pretty sure it is Universal Time, but don't know of anything stating so. Jim1138 (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Hello there. You contacted me yesterday regarding an edit I made to the Total Drama All-Stars page? Well, the lack of official sources on Total Drama has always been an issue. But if you look on all of the forums where fans talk about the show the most, the critical reaction is supremely negative.WisdomSeer (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WisdomSeer (talk • contribs)
 * re on WisdomSeer's talk Jim1138 (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Skilled group
A-holes of the labour market — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.98.58 (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

No Citation possible
I made a change to Jeff Martin's Wikipedia page about him winning our family's March Madness pool. Since it's a family pool, I'm not sure how there would be a citation (should I forward you the chain of emails?). But it is factual. Please update my changes so i can share it with Jeff and the family. It's factual and everyone would get a kick out of it. Respond to bhblacklow @ g m a i l. c o m

-Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.58.22 (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Melbourne Airport
The change I made to Melbourne Airport was for the following reason: The text on the hyperlink said "third most traveled route in the world", or something to that effect. When I clicked on the link to find out what the most traveled air routes in the world were, the chart said it was the fifth most traveled route. In that there were four others listed above it with higher annual passenger capacity. I don't need to provide a citation...I change the text to match the chart it was linking to. When the text said "third" and the chart says "fifth", one of them was wrong. I don't really care which one gets changed, but it's a given that they should match.69.47.57.162 (talk) 04:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Language edit
Sir, the language part of Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi is a Hindi film not English. Because Hindi films have English dialogues but its not billed as English too film. And sir its ok you didn't make a mistake in fact thank. Sir, if you edit the English part of film it will reverted by another user. I don't mind. Because here some users get anxious when they find English in Infobox. The film Ra.One is Hindi & English movie too but some user made it total Hindi for no apparent reason. Infact i have to complain about the users who keep editing and revert the edits. No single wikipedian is supporting Ra.One's edit. Anyways, thank you again R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 17:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Help for Ra.One
Sir, can you please help me? Sir, post the language for Ra.One as Hindi & English. Because the film is set in London & India. Some users are irritating and hence an edit war starts with another fellow users. I will be highly obliged. If they revert, block them. Because sir, the other users tried to made the edit and reverted always. No wikipedian is supporting me. Thanks again R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 17:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Donetsk Former incident
Hey, I'm sorry about that. I had forgotten it. The citation is up now and thanks for pointing it out to me.DmitryVasily (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Jimmy5561234576
This user blank out entire content from Hi, Mom!. I was about to revert vandalism, but you did it. Keep fighting against vandalism. A.Minkowiski (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit of Wi11337 User Page
Hey Jim, just wanted to see if my edit could not be removed thanks, I'm a friend of Wi11337 and we're just trying something out on his user page. (Also I know for a fact he is an awful beatboxer).

Thanks

87.114.185.0 (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Total Drama All-Stars Edit
Hello there, it's me again. Regarding credible sources on the poor reception of All-Stars as the two of us had been discussing last week, a lot of the criticism aimed at the season was attributed to the character Mike/Mal who was the main villain of the season, and controversial for his portrayal of MPD in a comedic manner. I was pointed to the Total Drama Facebook page where a known associate of Fresh TV did in fact acknowledge the character as having been controversial, in part due to this season. Could that be considered a reliable source?WisdomSeer (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Constitution Party (United States)
Like i was said when i was reverted but explained one that this party is clearly a paleoconservative. I was readed it's party platform that including advocates protectionist economy and non-interventionism (foreign policy) so my edits is sourced and accurate, thanks Adn1990 (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You removed sourced content without explaining why. Given the two reverts, I would suggest discussing it on talk:Constitution Party (United States) Jim1138 (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No, it's not sourced and i explaining my clarifications like i say before, sorry Adn1990 (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Source for it being paleoconservative? You did remove sourced content. Dougweller (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No, this two contents are poorly referenced. And like you know that's a paleoconservative party, right. Adn1990 (talk) 22:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Language edit (contd)
Sir, despite of it i did lots of hardwork for the language but no good return. And yes it's a bilingual film. I also applied a source from IMDB but they said its not a good source and IMdb shows Ra.One as Hindi Tamil Telugu Cantonese & English though (Tamil Telugu & Cantonese) is dubbed but English is a language too. Matter is really tough R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 03:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ra.one
Thanks my friend so much. But this source didnt work too. I find Imdb as one and final source but still they wont approve. I will make my edit successfull and wont give up easily. But i m helpless now. Still didnt get a source rather than Imdb R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 04:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Blackjack
Hi Jim1138 this is Mathematicalist. I see your blackjack deletion. I am not sure if you are a gambling expert as I am. When you walk the aisles and the hallways at the big gambling industry events such as G2E and ICGRT and the Gaming Industry Summit you hear the truths that casino customers never hear. That is why it says "some say". How else can I reference what a major casino blackjack shift manager says in the hallways at G2E? Wikipedia is about the people not about the private interests. It is about the only place where the people can speak though private interests like the casino industry pay a lot more attention to Wikipedia than Wikipedia people think. Industries like casinos and pharmaceuticals that prey on the public by way of their seductive mystiques are very focused on online and Wikipedia with its high Google status is not an afterthought it is a priority. Please restore that deletion. The public should avoid blackjack tournaments that are merely another means of setting up its fleecing in the casinos. Thanks Jim1138. Appreciate your understanding of this. When you are in Las Vegas next be sure to let me know in advance so we can meet up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathematicalist (talk • contribs) 04:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The issue is that Wikipedia needs to be verifiable . People want to be able to research information. Significant content must be wp:cited with reliable sources (RS). As your edits were unsourced, I removed them. Please feel free to restore them with an RS. Please review wp:welcome for information on editing Wikipedia. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ra.one
Anyways, I really wanna thank you for your so much help. Will do my edit soon and must say here Wikipedians do help. Thanks again Jim. R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 05:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me, Jim1138. Meant "The casinos don't need you to look out for them!" If you continue this clear misconduct then you should at least tell us all which casino company you are affiliated with. Blackjack tournaments as all gambling tournaments are meant to degrade gambler judgment and playing discipline so that the real house edge doubles or even triples. I imagine you don't know a hell of a lot about gambling. Or maybe you are an adherent of that half witted Wizard of Odds who is actually a front for online gambling which is an extremely negative development for our collective sanity. Leave that post of mine in place and go bother the Barry Obama post to get it deleted on the grounds of fraudulence. Thanks man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathematicalist (talk • contribs) 06:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Alvin and Judith Neelley
I thought I quite clearly explained my reasons for removing the material in my edit summary--it was a verbatim copy of a newspaper report, and as such was a violation of copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.142.207 (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Violation of 3 revert rule
In 24 hours, a user Kailash29792 had violated the 3 Revert Rule on page Ra.One. Plus he is engaged in Edit war since language part has 2 important source. This is the chance where my edit can be preserved. Or else he will start a new Edit war. Report this user or else my sourced information will be reverted. Thanks R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 13:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

UK elections (1992-2005) and a reverting IP
The IP 31.53.37.58 has been making continued reverting of those infoboxes, particularly about photos. Could you look into doing something about it? I've been reverting his reverts, but its getting tiring now. Byzantium Purple (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I (or you) could open a ticket on WP:AN/EW. Would you be concerned about getting blocked? I haven't been following too closely. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, I have been reverting all his reverts, but its purely to prevent his reverts from being permanent. I'm willing to stop if this is looked at. I may have made some quite unappropriate comments when reverting, but it was when I was heated and angry. Could you open a ticket? Byzantium Purple (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I need to warn you to be neutral here. I'll look into adding a ticket. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

Recent change in gender equality

 * The term 'gender' and the term 'sex' do not give same meaning. Sex is what is between our legs and gender is what is between our ears. Even wikipedia has different articles of sex and gender. We should not let readers confuse those terms which have different meanings. So I had removed the terms 'sex equality and sexual equality' from the article.
 * Well another term comes of narrow definition of gender in gender equality. Not only men and women are equal, genderqueers are also equal. They are not included in this article so I had removed the term that 'men and women are equal' and replaced with 'all people are equal'.
 * The term 'sex'and 'gender' are not the same. It has different meanings. So sex equality means equality between male sex, female sex and intersex whereas gender equality is the equality between men, women and genderqueer people. So it is better that these terms do not collapse each other. That's why i removed the redirect of sex equality to gender equality.

So I'd like to request you to remove the terms 'sex equality and sexual equality' from the article and define it not only equality between men and women but also genderqueer people. -Krozan7 (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * per Gender, it does appear to be used interchangeably. If you read my note, I removed it as you did not explain your removal. I suggest you discuss this on the talk pages as there are others who would disagree. Jim1138 (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing List of Time-Banks around the World, Jim1138.

Unfortunately Loriendrew has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Your csd was removed by article author, unreviewing article"

To reply, leave a comment on Loriendrew's talk page. — Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

December 13/Star Trek Into Darkness
Hello, I just want to ask, in what way is changing the line "It was announced that Star Trek 3 is scheduled to be released" to "It was announced that Star Trek 13 is scheduled to be released" worthy of including a source? I just need to count the Star Trek movies already made to get to the conclusion that Star Trek 12's sequel will be Star Trek 13, so I don't see why my change has been reverted. Especially since the next sentence mentions a "thirteenth Star Trek movie" anyway, so why write Star Trek 3 in the first place? Greetings Smintili (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Duran Duran
OK message received.

However the article history and talk page history clearly shows a campaign by a single user to push his view.

I am not the first to try and deal with this and I guess I won't be the last.

Thanks86.162.127.214 (talk) 22:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

AN/I
Jim, I mentioned you in AN/I under "Please Temp Block Dick for Disruptive Reversions".

Duxwing (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Ey man I started the Shakadza page, and where were you by then? Now you think you know better about my village than me? Get off your high horse dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oscar Mpfunzeni (talk • contribs) 21:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)