User talk:Jim1138/Archive 4

User Neon's Page Editing
It is my original User Name. That is why editing the Same. While trying to register username Neon on Commons it is not getting. So I Selected another user Name as Ranjithsiji. Now Moving the old contents to new username that is all--Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Amuel Gins

 * First of all, my edits were intended to fix damage by another user (User:WarriorsPride6565), who deleted random words all over the Tanka people article, then added gramatically and factually incorrect information to Miscegenation and Interracial marriage. Reread the previous versions of those sections, and tell me if the English is correct. You may have mistook my large reference templates (with google book links and quotes), as me adding massive amounts of material to the article, and promptly assumed I was vandalizing. Or, if you were looking at the massive blocks of text I pasted, those may have been public domain works which are out of copyright, I am quite liberal with using them.


 * Secondly, you claimed since my references were books they "do not seem to be easily accessibly". If you looked at my reference templates, you would actual see that I included direct links to google books in every single one of them. See Tanka_people. you can see the text of the book yourself.


 * Materialscientist also reverted my fixes on Tanka people, reverting back to the version vandalized by WarriorsPride6565. Go look at User talk:WarriorsPride6565. He was threatened with blocks for the vandalism. I'm not kidding, He deleted words all over the article and nobody fixed it. Look at Talk:Tanka_people. Amuel Gins (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Vpayez - Hodgkin Huxley model and similar pages
Jim1138: I am brand new to Wikipedia and want to serve and do a good job of contributing. I had added a published reference (one that can be easily substantiated as valid) to the Hodgkin-Huxley model (and similar) pages. You wrote and said "Please make sure to include an edit summary." First, what does this mean? Second, I noticed that my contributions were removed :( Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vpayez1931 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Huggle
Might want to be a little more careful with your reverts. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching that. I definately need to watch that.  I reverted my warning and apologized to user talk:65.184.92.226 Jim1138 (talk) 04:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've done the same sort of thing before, too. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Arabs in Turkey
Please explain to me why I shouldn't block you for violating the three revert rule at Arabs in Turkey. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually I've just gone ahead and blocked the account, because I can't see any rationale under WP:3RR for which you should be exempt. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The number of Arabs living in Turkey is by this reference is > 8 million per Link. User talk:Azadmaster first changes it to 60,000 then to 200,000 and did not remove the source.  It looks like "factual errors" and an attempt to "scrub" Arabs from Turkey to me.  I had been informed that reverting vandalism was not limited by 3RR, after reading WP:NOT3RR, I could see how this does not necessary fall into the exemption.  Jim1138 (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is classified as a content dispute, perhaps User_talk:Azadmaster should not be permanently blocked? Jim1138 (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The problem is that User:Sero1988 has quoted (what appears to be) a reliable source showing that the 8 million number is highly inflated. As for the block on Azadmaster, I will get the blocking administrator involved. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * All of the edits that I reverted 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Left the www.turiyearplari.org (8,317,545 Arabs in Turkey) reference just to the right of the 60K / 200K / 8M figure intact and did not add any other reference (that I noticed) refuting the 8M number. As User:Sero1988's reference was not included during my (erroneous?) reverts I did not have any other source to go by. Jim1138 (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That is a good enough reason; I've unblocked your account. I still think you were too quick to revert, but you genuinely believed it to be facts-based vandalism. Sorry for any inconvenience. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what lessons to come away with. Slowing down on the revert speed might be a good idea, but how?  Should I leave  a message on the alleged vandal's talk page? (which goes unanswered more often then not)  Wait awhile for an answer then start reverting again?  Revert three times then put it on ANI?  BTW: do you think an apology is in order?  Thanks for unblocking me.  It was/is a learning experience, not an inconvenience (thanks for the time off!) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If there is any chance that it is a valid content dispute, then leave a message on the person's talk page, yes. And/or on the article's talk page. And if you get no response, you know it was vandalism. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This and  were inadequate? Jim1138 (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Rosemary Radford Ruether
Thanks. This book summary should be back soon.Vegetarianbchris419 (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey Jim...
Hey, I don't know if this is where you leave messages as I do not use Wiki that often. I represent Jeffree and he would like for his discography page to be the way he wants it. He does not want to have his label/management to get involved because it's time consuming, so if you could please help me out and ban Devin from editing, Jeffree and I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffreesworld (talk • contribs) 04:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for using Huggle
If you can, please keep on monitoring this page.
 * I left you a message on my page Devin Davis   ( talk )  04:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I did not delete anything.
I interspersed my comments with those of my opponent. You, on the other hand, deleted my content proposal for Heavy Metal Poisoning Hypothesis, which was easier to read and actually supported the point that prions are caused by Manganese. 137.186.47.81 (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

It's a back and forth argument.
Putting all of my arguments in one block makes it hard to know why I am saying one thing or another, or what I am arguing with. Arguments are hard to understand. It was meant to be that way. You hav to think for yourself at some point. 137.186.47.81 (talk) 08:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Interrupting other people is allowed according to that article you pointed at called "bad practice", although I am not sure that I understand the syntax. I can put quotations in for one of us. If a third person joins in the conversation, then I can put square brackets in. Please understand that, short of vandalism, reversions are almost always lazy and crude. It would be more helpful for you to show me what you mean. In other words, I do not understand what you mean by again deleting my section on the Heavy Metal Poisoning Hypothesis. Reversion of honest work is rude. 137.186.47.81 (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

New message
I left you a message on my talk page. Devin Davis  ( talk )  10:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
I'm not familiar with the ways of doing this and I see there is a lot of hostility toward that but will you please explain to me how my change was vandalism. I understand that it was unsigned and unexplained but it was a poorly constructed sentence with with a fallacy and I improved it. My change makes the criteria fit the previous definition in the Importance Assesment section of the page.--76.182.236.144 (talk) 04:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving me a note and asking. I hope this helps.  I flagged your revert as vandalism as you essentially said so yourself: Undid revision 480437886 by Jeff G. (talk) to get your attention.. Idk if you just automatically revert things or what but I'd like to see it discussed as to why this makes sense.  If you edit a page, it is best to leave an wp:edit summary so that others understand your reasoning.  That was the basis for Jeff G's removal of your edit ("Unexplained removal of content")   If your edit will likely be controversial, it is best to leave a comment in the talk page and ask for others opinion.  There are a number of individuals who monitor edits Recent changes patrol.  If an edit looks suspicious and there is not an edit summary (or it does not make sense), it is often removed. BTW: some atheists do read religious material for discussion / arguement and are very familiar with the topics.  If you have a question, ask. Jim1138 (talk) 05:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm aware that there are many atheists who are very well informed by I don't think enough so to warrant a special mention. I'm neither an atheist nor a devout christian but I don't agree that atheists are all so intelligent and well educated on religious material that it should be taken as a given.  That is a stereotype; even though it's often appreciatively advanced by atheists it is not fundamentally true.  There are many atheists who aren't educated on this and do not care to be.--76.182.236.144 (talk) 05:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for using a good edit summary. A good summary even if I am annoyed. :) Jim1138 (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am also annoyed. I really don't even care that much but it is grammatically awkward, a stereotype, and giving undue credit to a population of people who are frankly already confident enough about their intellectual capabilities lol. Anyways I suppose this has all been good practice.  --76.182.236.144 (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that vandal on my talk page Canuck My page89 (talk), 01:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Do you know anything about the community of Brookhaven?
The article for the community Brookhaven posted on Wikipedia contained propaganda designed to promote the city hood of Brookhaven. A close check of the statement by the Georgia Senator posted proves Brookhaven is not entirely located in Dekalb County. It is fraught with false information that even a Google check can disprove. The majority of the schools and parks claimed to be in "Brookhaven" are located in other communities or cities. The population is that of many surrounding communities combined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTimeTraveler2025 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have an issue of that nature, probably best to take it up on Arbitration/Requests. If you wp:edit war, you will probably get wp:blocked. Avoid being hoisted with your own petard! Good luck. Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, not in an edit war. In fact I would like it to stay as it is for US district Court review... Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTimeTraveler2025 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

AA has monopolized the recovery market and people should have all the information they can get regarding addiction. The link i provided was published in The Skeptic magazine its not my own research and its doing nothing more than allowing people to think for them selves. I'm sorry if you disagree. but as a recoved addict myself i truely believe in what medication can do. I've been to hundreds maybe thousands of AA meetings they just drove me back to drinking and using.; having to sit there for hours listening to people talk about there drug and alcohol usage isnt the best way to keep you clean...just my opinion though. and im not puting my opinion on there im offering other options. I am new to the whole wikipedia thing. but people have the right to decide what works best for them and it is nearly impossible to find any alternatives tp twelve step. So I gave people a way to find them.(Dmohr123 (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC))

Thanks for the advise
Thanks for the advise ill try that. My only goal is to get the point across that there are other options to consider and many people dont realize this they think they are confined to these twelve step programs...thanks againDmohr123 (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: parent peak
I noticed your comment at Talk:Mount Charleston. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mountains. It seems to me that the term "parent peak" is at least ambiguous. I would appreciate your comments on the project talk page.&#32;– droll  &#91;chat&#93;  01:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey there
Hi Jim. I was forwarded your name by an editor I respect considerably, Carrite. He wanted me to consider you for a possible future adminship. I stopped by to mention that it's lovely that you're involving yourself in reverting vandalism across Wikipedia. It'll be great to have you as a future administrator with us. At the same time, as a majority of your editing has been only in recent months, it'll be good if you edit for some more time expanding your areas of experience. Whenever you require any assistance, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Best. Wifione  Message 16:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Write articles. Hey, I just came by here to say I'm signing off. Each time I see you, next thing you know I'm blocking someone. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

RV bad link?
What was wrong with the link to the WHO statement in pdf?Frankgyn (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The link was briefed/truncated. It had a portion replaced with "/../".  If you want me to Please leave a link to the page in question as I don't have access to that info anymore.  Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Here is a better link to the pdf of the document right from WHO's website: www.who.int/entity/reproductivehealth/topics/ageing/cocs_hrt_statement.pdf If you could put this link back in with my statement, I believe the cause of freedom of information would be greatly served. Thanks for helping me to improve my skills with wikipedia editing and referencing.Frankgyn (talk) 03:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I replaced your content with the new link. You should test your edits and the links.  Please consider the replacement as a favor btw.  This is normally your job, not mine. Jim1138 (talk) 04:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

My talk page
Thank you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

A block
(No, don't worry, not for you.) Take a look at this history. The perp is blocked, and no he may not appeal it. If you think that this is too harsh, just say the word. -- Hoary (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Great comment on the IPs talk page. I was actually hoping for a vacation ;) I've added about 600 counts in the last 24 hours to my WP:HIGHSCORE Thanks for protecting Jenna Marbles too.  I think the IP needs a vacation as well.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

In similar situations, I used to leave a different kind of comment, one that was just as coolly written but had a greater impact. It worked rather often, but unfortunately at least one experienced WP editor politely objected to it. So this is the best I can do. -- Hoary (talk) 08:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Verifiability, not truth. Bwuhaha! Drmies (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

This is hilarious. However, I think that the IP was actually trying to say that Jim was the one doing all that which I won't repeat. So the IP actually isn't excited. Calabe1992 15:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, I agree. But I've not seen any evidence of Jim1138, or any other Wikipedian I know of, sucking any dick in the first place. Also, I wish we lived in a world where this wasn't enough to make a person famous. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Is the one in File:Autofellatio5.jpg a Wikipedian? Some of us have ended up seeing that one time too many (and sorry for linking to it again). (Edit: I would look for myself, but don't even want to open it to see who the uploader was!) Calabe1992 15:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Autofellatio5.jpg or How to trick... (Jenna Marbles)... I'm not sure which I'd rather view. Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I feel a little queasy now. I've seen it before--I wish the dude had a better haircut. Yes, he's (formerly) one of us: User talk:Jiffman. Drmies (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Marcus Junius Brutus
In reply to your comment about the lack of a reliable source for my edit to the Brutus page, how come you didn't tell the person who did the Assassin's Creed entry, which I added onto, to put a source in? I can easily put my addition in with the source being the Project Legacy app on Facebook or the appropriate page on the Assassin's Creed Wiki site for why Brutus killed Caesar and evidence of the fact that Caesar was a Templar ally along with Cleopatra. Would that satisfy your requirement? 84.13.114.157 (talk) 01:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I did not read the entire edit. I assumed you were adding "real" history.  My bad.  I'll replace your edit and undo my warning.  Thanks for letting me know.  Cheers.  Jim1138 (talk) 01:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Donald Trump, Jr.
I saw you reverted a NPOV, unsourced statement. I added a source at Donald Trump, Jr. about his hunting -- and also a worded it as neutrally as I could. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Jim how are you? I would just like to say you are a true inspiration to all users of Wikipedia. I hope to be like you some day. You are my hero. All the best Helloeggs 22:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

cie
i am sorry about that mistake with his page, i am still learning here, but he should of minded his own buisness and not deleted my contribution in the first place, thanks.
 * i am sorry about that mistake, still learning here, but he should have minded his buisness and not delete my edits in the first place, thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikelimerick (talk • contribs) 22:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * how does it work, an you an employee of wiki? is it possible to get paid to work for them by checking edits? and is someone who has come across my edits like you and the other user in question from the same country as me or another country? as i am new to this, sorry again for any mistakes i made, i did know about the new section area until now, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikelimerick (talk • contribs) 23:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problems with the mistakes, we all make them! Thanks for being willing to discuss them (many are not). Unfortunately (for me at least :-) ), it is a volunteer position.  There are few paid positions in Wikipedia.  The English language version of Wikipedia "en.wikipedia.com" can be accessed by and edited by anyone.  I do volunteer work on Wikipedia as it contributes to people's awareness and hopefully improves people's lives and the planet. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank You
Hey Jim! Thanks for your Lucknow coord edit :) I was ping-ponging between dms and decimal coordinates and was close to ruining the page. — Ashay (talk) 09:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Check out Obtaining geographic coordinates The zoom on maps.Google is a bit high, so it probably needs more work. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. I've found out that custom zoom can be forced on maps however precise the coordinates are. See WP:COORD and WP:COORD. But this feature is available only in Template:Coord whereas Lucknow uses soon to be deleted Template:Infobox Indian jurisdiction to locate the city. What can be done? — Ashay (talk) 10:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Robert Young (pro-cyclist)‎
I wanted to become a page stalker and not have a psychic (psychotic?) link with you. Young's article is on my watchlist as I did a Prod. I see the changes and undo it, but behold, an edit conflict because you already have done it. My gosh, stop doing you job so well and be a slacker for awhile. Use that psychiatric link between us and figure out I've already got it. Hmmm, I wonder if it was a good idea to become a page stalker. Bgwhite (talk) 09:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I could setup a 'bot to vandalize it periodically so that you feel useful. Maybe you could hack Huggle to ignore your watchlist?  Mrs. Brown "I'm psycho! I'm psycho!" It was just vandalized again.  I waited 30 seconds at least before reverting! Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Republic of China
Can you please stop reverting at Talk:Republic of China. The idea is for no one to change the closed section. If there is a problem you can talk to one of us closing admins, but as it stands now we will have to check the history to see what revision it was when the discussion closed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Will do! Thank you! Not leaving a talk back.  Jim1138 (talk) 11:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Our version should be pretty close, although there are a couple of other comments made after closure that I didn't manage to remove. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 11:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

I have checked the state of the talk page now, only one real comment was added late, the rest of the changes were moving text around, or auto-signs. I have removed the late comment and relocated the section that I included in the close that was on another topic. This seems to be what half the edit war was about. Materialscientist has now offered to block any editors of the closed section. If the four of you involved in the edit war agree to stop altering the closed section I will unlock the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Suggested Kallar (caste) topics
MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology
I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention.  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 09:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

User Talk:98.211.59.171
Hi. I noticed your many warnings to this IP after I noticed it making a bad edit. Are all of this user's edits bad edits? It certainly is making a lot of edits. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Seeking help with a College Basketball Article
Hey Jim, I'm currently working on an article for the 2003-2004 Saint Joseph's Hawks Mens Basketball and I was wondering if you were at all interested in helping me add to it. The url is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003%E2%80%9304_Saint_Joseph%27s_Hawks_men%27s_basketball_team, thanks for the help. 5hane2012 (talk) 01:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC)5hane20125hane2012 (talk) 01:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Esau Wood, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Riley Huntley (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
thank you jim i did not know what to do thats why i posted on his wall as he kept editing and we are the official team trying to update the article thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladyzaib (talk • contribs) 21:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

20:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Help
Do you know hot add an clickable image map to Wiki articles? Please see these maps, File:Map of Nizamat Imambara2.JPG and also File:Nizamat Fort Campus.JPG and please also see the building's names added there. The buildings are Nizamat Imambara, Wasef Manzil, Madina Mosque, Hazarduari Palace, Chawk Masjid, Murshidabad Clock Tower and Bacchawali Tope. All these topics have an article each, and I am the author. But I want these map to modify into clickable like the one in the article Bhūmi. i am unable to understand anything..please help. for any help please lave me a message or see in the image that in which articles have these images been added. And when you are replying please leave me a Tb template.-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 17:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Arabs in Turkey article
Hi Jim, I've noticed your previous contributions and interest in the article above, and thought to invite you to have a new look at the article, as some users are trying to impose their opinions and to pick the sources they like. Your input and comments their would be appreciated. Thanks. عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (film)
Do you consider removing "gay" from The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (film) vandalism? cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW suggestion: Don't template the regulars Jim1138 (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Hello, No, I don't!  Please accept my apologies.  You are correct.  I got in a muddle. I have to blame it on my old mouse!  Then one error escalated into another...  I have put it back now as I and you believe it should be.  Please let me know when you see this to put my mind at rest.
 * As for the template, we are looking into that at STiki. It should not have been issued.
 * -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * An "Oops cheers!" would have been more than adequate. We all make mistakes.  Some of us even have help from Huggle or STiki!  Thanks for the note.  Jim1138 (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome. Cheers!  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Beaus $ Eros
See Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beaus $ Eros. 123.224.147.168 (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Frood! Ohai What did I break now? 00:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Bonita, California
I'm being told that the IP's edits to the Bonita, California page are not vandalism. Personally, I feel it is, but since it's disputable, it's edit war/3rrable. Just a heads up. I've posted on the IP's talk page. AndrewN talk 00:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yea, seemed to have gotten carried away. WP:NOT3RR allows revert of offensive language, etc. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * We'll see what happens at AIV. They've been reported for a while.  So far, no response from them.  AndrewN  talk 00:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

OMG
I'm so sorry for the warns I'd give you. I don't know what's wrong with my HG. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Earlier I tried to update the URL for this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_%28New_York_City_Subway_service%29 by putting the URL of the new location of the JoeKorNer. The original image was on this page: http://thejoekorner.quuxuum.org/rollsigns/irtend.html which was moved a number of years ago to http://www.thejoekorner.com/rollsigns/irtend.html The actual image is now http://www.thejoekorner.com/rollsigns/irtendno3.gif

I can be reached at joekor@thejoekorner.com

Sorry for the confusion.

Joseph D. Korman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.117.104 (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2012 (UTC)