User talk:Jim1138/Archive 47

Section on digital vaccines
Hi Jim,

I just noticed that you undid my edit to Vaccines. I am a researcher, psychiatrist and neuroscientist at stanford and added this section based on an abstract that has been accepted at MedicineX. I read the abstract which is published online. Can you please advise about whether this sub section makes sense to add to vaccines and if so, how and when do you think I can add it to the article? Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4D01:1100:1894:5C0A:2D8:219E (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * May I suggest getting an wp:account? It appears that your IP changes, making it difficult to communicate.
 * I checked the link added to digital vaccines and did not see anything mentioned about digital vaccines. Perhaps one needs to be logged in? As I could not verify your edit, I removed it.
 * To add content, you would need to wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS).
 * Regarding if it should be added to vaccine, I would suggest you ask ? He is a physician, long time Wikipedia editor and wp:administrator and would have a better idea if it could be added. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I have contributed to wikipedia a few times in the past about areas related to my research but have just created an account per your suggestion. I don't think a stanford login is needed to access the abstract although you need to dig in to scroll down to the bottom of that page and click through the preliminary program to locate it. Although, I am also not sure if the computer needs to be registered with SUNetID (stanford's network) to get access to the abstracts. I will try to find out from our department's network administrator. The online abstract i cited is available at http://medicinex.stanford.edu/medicine-x-ed-2017-preliminary-program/#1484722189887-a3a541f7-76d0 To locate the abstract you can scroll to the very bottom of the page showing the "preliminary program". The specific tab under the preliminary program section, which you can click on, is the tab for "Engagement Learning Design". You will find the abstract under the Poster Presentation section at the bottom with the title Developing a digital vaccine based on neuropsychology and cognitive behavior therapy to reduce the risk of lifestyle diseases. The peer reviewed abstract is the first in the list with the name of the author. For sake of disclosure, I am on the abstract review committee for the conference at Stanford School of Medicine but I was not among the reviewers of this particular abstract submission nor do I have any conflict of interest with this research. I do know that that the abstract scored very highly from all the reviewers and builds upon previous peer reviewed breakthrough results shown by pioneering methods developed by Prakash et al. MamaDoc (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect revert
Please be careful with the Huggle revert button --24.79.239.227 (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Kiss Me Once (album)
Sorry, it was an accident. Chester Oh Yeah (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Not Vandalism
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Sandhawalia, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. --24.79.239.227 (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Where did I use the word "vandalism"? Jim1138 (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * You've used it everywhere, my son. You've used the label, but not the word ;). 108.65.249.149 (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, I've reviewed your comment on my article. I don't need to be civil to anyone. It's about doing the right thing. Collaboration is the wrong way to approach Wikipedia because it doesn't allow for independent editing. I have been nominated for many roles and responsibilities on Wikipedia including admin status and I don't see any reason to collaborate, over English grammar.

Can you address this issue? 108.65.249.149 (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Sure. If I see you being uncivil again, I'll warn you again. If you keep it up, I'll request an admin take a look and possibly block you. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

You haven't addressed my issue. Have you addressed yours? 108.65.249.149 (talk) 05:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * It is addressed as far as I am going here. Jim1138 (talk) 05:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, fine. 108.65.249.149 (talk) 05:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Non-reference
http://www.choosingwisely.org/partners/american-college-of-surgeons/

Visit that, and report what content you see.

Does it say "Details coming soon"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.179.76 (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

What is this? All I tried to do, and which you reverted, was to delete a reference that went nowhere. Why do I have to now improve on what was a bogus, nonsensical link in the very first place?

My deletion should stand, as the original citation can not be substantiated. Jim1138 is not behaving honestly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.179.76 (talk) 05:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

about ilbe edits
Hello, I am cjsvobetite. I previously did the same edits that I just made, and you reverted it, so I cited the source and edited it again. I don't know why you reverted my edits, maybe because you did not notice the source, or maybe because the source was in Korean. Would you please specify it in my talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjsvobetite (talk • contribs) 11:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Mistakes in map
Italy and India aren't considered as common regional power in all the other articles.Some consider them great powers while others regional ones.They aren't at the same level of Spain and Turkey.A lot of imagination in that map.89.97.225.68 (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

I can't stay every day behind the mistakes of ignorant or bad feith people of every age.That map fruit of ignorance will stay so as a shame for the site.89.97.225.68 (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

In the site can write today by web people from 2nd and 3rd world as knowledge not only as having.Why do you ask me it?89.97.225.68 (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Altaic familycolor
We do use Altaic as an areal classification, not a family, so we can use that familycolr to Modern and Old Korean dialects. For more information, see Template:Infobox language. --211.54.2.241 (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Who is "We"? Altaic languages "discredited" Jim1138 (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, familycolor Altaic is not about a language family. It's used for just an areal classification. Also, several language articles besides Korean are using that familycolor. (e.g. Turkish language, Mongolian language, Japanese language) --117.53.77.84 (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, got it. Strange color name. Sorry for all the headaches. Jim1138 (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
Some body put edit on my wikikipedia and I thought I was typing on google seardchdhc sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.39.75.146 (talk) 10:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Anna Mosca Page Under Construction
I respect you doing what you do, however, could you not be so fast as to threaten my work as soon as I start, since I have the following:

1) 4 years of absence from here to reacquaint myself with navigating my way around here again 2) A brutally slow computer that crashes a lot, hangs even more, and frustrates me frequently 3) 6 incidences of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) that makes your 1 hour of work a 6-9 hour ordeal for me on a GOOD DAY 4) A sleep disorder related to #3 above that exacerbates everything else to make my life pretty challenging as a disabled USAF, service-connected injured Veteran.

Half of this formatting is akin to the ancient days of DOS formatting, Machine Language and/or HTML code-writing, etc. which I cannot master, no matter how hard I try, after 38 years. And when you have an entrenched case of brain fog that cannot focus on too much flip-flopping between pages to quadruple check every little jot and tittle every other minute.

And telling me to try and memorize all the how-to's just adds more misery to the woodpile of things this enbattled gray matter can't handle. Just looking down at the bottom of this text dialog box with all those strange symbols makes my eyes glaze over with pain to even wonder what they do, mean, etc., where I will NEVER go!!!

I am doing my best with 14-plus hours of time invested, just to make half of a page that I might function (I hope!!!) And it has taken me nearly 40 minutes just to write this, due to text hanging, mistyping, etc. Where's the grace to soldier through this, and then let this all come out in the wash in due season? Good Heavens Man, you can't clean your fish before you catch them!!!

Unless you have a 2-clicks, cut and paste fix-all, cure-all solution to this, my volunteer work that keeps me going is going to really be a nightmare rather than a blessing to me and those I am trying to help...

Any suggestions? I am fresh out of ideas... Thank you for understanding, I hope! MDSeverson Mdseverson (talk) 12:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Oops!
Hi.

I seem to have reverted one of your revisions by mistake. I fixed my error but you should have by now received a reversion notification.

Sorry.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! No need for the note, really. I (and others) do this thing a lot. I however, use wp:huggle which automatically warns the supposed offender. Then I get to do a serious apology and cleanup. Thank you for the note and apology! And even bigger thank you for all of your hard work! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

DC Lottery
My changes to the DC Lottery webpage are accurate and the verification is posted. In the future, I would be more worried about updating the latest games offered by DC Lottery instead of deleting an entry without a simple visit to the DC Lottery website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.157.68 (talk) 03:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Sectarian violence in Iraq was actually a civil war
Hey dude, I just would love to tell you guys that the "Sectarian violence in Iraq (2006–07)" must be renamed to the "Iraqi Civil War (2006-08) since the civil war was going one more year and the civil war was not only between Shi'ites and sunnis, but it's also between Mahdi Army and other armies and the Iraqi government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IbrahimWeed (talk • contribs) 11:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Logo
What about the logo? Scynthian (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

British Israelism
Thanks. I presume you've noticed that the editor is "Member and secretary of the Victorian office of the Australian branch of The British-Israel-World Federation."? Doug Weller talk 09:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Doh! I should have read his talk page first. Of course you have. Doug Weller  talk 09:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That quick orange bar appearance freaked me out! I thought it was him. Yes, visited his user page. I left a comment on his talk page. See what happens. Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, why talk about me? Is there a problem? I am happy to talk and explain my intentions why I am on here representing the B.I.W.F. Scynthian (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Change on Abington Heights School District wikipedia page
Hi Jim, I am following up about one of the changes I made to the Abington Heights School District wikipedia page. To remind you, I wrote at the bottom of the general summary after the sentence "The High School Orchestra and Chorus..." that "Some of the high school's All-State alumni include Kate Glidewell (Chorus '14 '15), Joe Sileo (Band '14), Nicholas Beckish (Orchestra '15), and Richard Ling (Orchestra '15 '16)." Here are my sources: http://timesleader.com/news/4571/abington-heights-high-school-students-qualify-for-all-state-orchestra-competition http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/school-notes-5-5-2014-1.1680342 https://timesleader.com/archive/386206/news-local-news-news-152395630-two-ah-students-qualify-for-all-state-chorus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F470:22:2:10B3:3EAE:371F:4BCC (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Khun Srun
Dear Jim1138, why did you remove my last edit (Khun Srun) ? 05:16, 17 February 2017‎ Jim1138 (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (8,283 bytes) (-68)‎. . (Reverted edits by Domrey_sar (talk): Failure to cite a reliable source (HG) I wrote all the text about Khun Srun. Please check. Best regards, Domrey Sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 07:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

reason:why i removed all the contents from cpdm page
i created another page for the same since the current page is not displayed in any of the google results — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unaissait (talk • contribs) 04:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

hi jim.how to delete the previous article page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Centre_for_Product_Design_and_Manufacturing_(CPDM) delete this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unaissait (talk • contribs) 05:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * At the top line of the page, add Please, follow my request at the top of this page and sign your talk with four tildes. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Unaissait (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Editing regarding Vasundhara raje
Hello Jim,

Thanks for the response, I will keep the things in mind. I would like you to know that I have taken permission from the user to edit that content which i had taken. If possible kindly allow me to write content on Vasundhara Raje's wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishake Mehta (talk • contribs) 09:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just saying that you have permission is insufficient. You should write it in your own words. If you copy/paste it again, it will be removed. Jim1138 (talk) 09:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

That was bit rude of you brother. I will rewrite the content and then edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishake Mehta (talk • contribs) 09:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I didn't say that I would remove it. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. There are apps which scan information for copyright infringement. Please be careful. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks Brother. I will keep the guidelines in my mind. Can you tell me how to remove the content if someone wants to?
 * If someone wrote the wrong things and it is wrong, can you just help me in removing that thing?

RTS
I explained why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.178.255.63 (talk) 10:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Message
Dear Sir, we are three Italian students and we have to report it a real persecution that is implementing an Italian director, a certain Vituzzu, against the writings of a professor, which we think very much, Prof. Giovanni Bianco (defining a value quotations spam). Today has canceled its sitazioni the rule of law items, Nihilism, Costitution and Constitutional Law and economics as well as the voice on the Fascist racial laws of which she spoke. We ask the courtesy to help and protect queaste of high scientific value quotes. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.92.126.228 (talk • contribs)
 * FYI it's an Italian sockmaster I've just globally blocked, cheers! --Vituzzu (talk) 01:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Dear Lord, we ask you to reinsert the citations deleted from Sig.Vituzzu confusing serious students with sockmaster.We ask you to verify the scientific value of the quoted texts. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.41.87.220  (talk • contribs) 02:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * He's back! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Did a naughty. Jim1138 (talk) 02:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked again, but I expect him to go on goofing around for a while, then pretending to disappear then being back again...--Vituzzu (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Dear Lord, we ask you to intervene and reinsert the scientific value quotes unfairly deleted. However, last night we received a nuvo contemptuous and aggressive message sig.Vituzzu. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.41.72.2 (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the amusement! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

It's no fun, it is unasegnalazione very serious. Believe us, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.91.80.202 (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

It should be noted that the intervention of Dr. Maddalena deleted hide was genuine and there was no identity theft. This is false and Dr. lie is willing to clarify the fact, to defend the actions of the three undergraduates and scientific value of their quotations and to meet in person the sig.Vituzzu. Thank you (Please do not delete!!!)


 * You are so amusing. Please keep up the entertainment! Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What, don't like being amusing? How sad... Jim1138 (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Re: I'm disappointed with your conspiracy theory blog
Yeah, I have been busy so I have not been writing up many recently. 12th grade really gets in the way. As for the userboxes, thanks. :)  The Ninja5 Empire  ( Talk ) 11:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Editing of Luboš Motl page
Hi Jim1138, You (or someone else) have signaled the edit I made to Luboš Motl's page as possible vandalism and reverted the article to its preceding state. While I understand getting suspicious on edits on biographies of living persons I don't understand why did this suspicion survive after reading the edit. What I wrote is verifiable, and not from questionable sources, as has instead been signaled. The sources I cite, of course, are from Motl's blog, a (self-published) personal blog, but it neither is: It is a self-published source on itself. More explicitly, it is not even the author talking about his past or his purported aims, it is the author talking for himself expressing his own view.
 * 1) used as a (questionable source) on some topic of which the author is not a well-known expert;
 * 2) used as a self-published source giving information about living people different from the author.

It is not as using his page where he asserts he has always been against immigration, etc., to report that he always has; it is using his page where he asserts that he is against immigration, etc., to report that he stated he shared that view at the time of publication of his blog entry; I hope the point is clear.

What has to be verified is exactly that he stated A on his blog, so the only way to reliably source such a claim is to point to where he has said A on his blog. I can't think of something better at least.

Note that to avoid making more generic claims harder to justify on the base of the cited entries of the blog I have just reported the specific things he has said, almost with the same wording, as can be verified from the first quote I used (for what concerns gay couples).

I hope you agree with my comment, or give me reasons why you don't.

I won't try to revert the article to its preceding state and will be waiting for you or someone else to do that, since there is no reason why that bit of information had to be cancelled, in terms of unsourced material at least.

Adfghlio90 (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Spelling correction: Latter-day Saints
The correct spelling for Latter-day Saints is Latter-day Saints.

Georgeahaws (talk) 04:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

The article is named Church of Christ (Latter Day Saints). You changed the link to Church of Christ (Latter-day Saints) which is a wp:redlink and doesn't take you anywhere. That is why I reverted you. If you want to get the article renamed, I suggest you open a discussion on talk:Church of Christ (Latter Day Saints). Personally, I don't care either way. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Toontown Online edit
I made a change to the Toontown Online, and it got taken down, what i did state was true  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.202.113.209 (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Need some help :)
Hi Jim,

I would like to thank you for all the time and effort you have spent in keeping Wikipedia accurate as possible.

I see that you are a very experienced Wikipedia editor therefore, I am messaging you in the hope of getting some help/advice.

I was reading through the "Insurgency in Balochistan" and I have identified some misinformation/lies. on the fourth paragraph it states that "Baloch militants have targeted minority communities such as Hazara Shia on the basis of their religious beliefs." this is totally wrong. Baluch nationalists do not target people based on their religious beliefs. The whole paragraph is false. The Hazara community has always been targeted by radical Islamist groups such as the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Sipah-e-Sahaba both were founded in Punjab and are non Baluch organisations. These are clear facts that you can confirm by doing a simple Google search. The paragraph also does not provide any references regarding what is written in it except a timeline of the attacks on the Hazara community. The whole paragraph is aimed at defaming Baluch nationalist by portraying them as religious extremists when in fact they're quite the opposite.

I sincerely request and hope that you take the necessary actions to get rid of this misinformation.

If you require additional information please do let me know.

Thank You

Nouman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nouman Baluch (talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not sure which article you are referring to here. Would you please add a link and suggest the specific section? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Balochistan this is the link to the article. it is the fourth paragraph which i am referring to, the one that starts with "Baloch militants have targeted minority communities such as Hazara Shia on the basis of their religious beliefs." Thanks!


 * I wouldn't classify it as totally wrong since the Hazara are being targeted, just apparently not by "Baloch militants". The best way to lie is to have it mostly truthful. I would suggest that you lay out your case on talk:Insurgency in Balochistan. Use wp:reliable sources to support your points. Then, remove the erroneous content with an edit summary "removed misleading information, see talk page". This way someone else won't revert your edits (again). See wp:talk page guidelines (Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes "~" ) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I am not able to edit the page for some reason, when i make a change and try to save it the page never loads. Yes Hzaras are being targeted but this has nothing to do with baluch militants, therefore, that paragraph doesn't belong there. You can do a simple google search and you'll find who is targeting the hazara community, saying that the baluch militants target hazara is an outright lie.


 * Not sure what the problem is, but if you can't edit it, I wouldn't be able to do so either. Wikipedia does sometimes glitch. There are also wp:Edit filters which you may have inadvertently hit. Try a Help:Dummy edit Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Gelora Citramas Stadium
Hi,

I'm reverting an XfD template added from banned user: Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte. Thanks. 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Remember to check the description of the edit before reverting. Don't worry, I've made that same mistake before as well. Sky  Warrior  03:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Re: Regarding Tyreke Evans Bio
Hi, you made a mistake regarding Tyreke Evans bio. It said "traded to the Mexican Cartel in 2013"? Seems odd for an NBA player. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.208.47 (talk) 06:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Full explanation
is here visible Please, avoid baseless disqualifications--178.223.67.126 (talk) 06:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Manic Pixie Dream Girl Revert
Can you please explain why you undid this removal? It's sloppy philosophical theorizing based on very bad sources. One Tumbler blog post, which is just an opinion of a random person and two books that came out before the term was invented. Aapjes (talk) 14:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Revenge of the Sith Novel Edit
Hello Jim1138,

I'm sorry that I didn't respond sooner in respect to my ROTS novel edit. In the DVD Commentary at Chapter 40: Battle of the Heroes, Lucas confirmed that there was a continuity error during that scene. In one shot, Obi-Wan is holding Anakin's lightsaber (as evidenced by the hilt), but then in the next shot, Obi-Wan is holding his own lightsaber. If you go to http://www.geocities.ws/mrghoul_01/theduel.html, it describes the scene where Obi-Wan is seen holding Anakin's lightsaber. At http://www.geocities.ws/mrghoul_01/mustafar_images/saberhilt_comparison.jpg, you can see shot by shot comparisons where the lightsaber hilt is seen changing (from Anakin's to Obi-Wan's back to Anakin's). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jango32 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello
The Reason I Had Removed The Content Was Because It Ruined My Editing, I Can Now Deal With It and Also Add A Bit More Info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NightMarzEU (talk • contribs) 00:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

War of Chioggia edits
Hello Jim,

I attempted to add to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Chioggia and was surprised when my fiancee found my message waiting on her computer! Maybe I misunderstood the rules of providing citations for my sources. I tried to fix my citation, but I am completely unfamiliar with the technical way in which footnotes are inserted on this site. I was just trying to be helpful by contributing a little something to a resource I have used since its inception (Wikipedia overall).

I was attempting to cite this book: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Long_Twentieth_Century.html?id=cFfKtpgn4fkC

I am almost certain that I have all of the information necessary to add the proper citation (below), so what is the proper way to go about citing this source, in order to be in line with Wikipedia's policies?

[The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times Giovanni Arrighi Winner of the American Sociological Association PEWS Award (1995) for Distinguished Scholarship p.115 Verso, London UK, 1994]

Regards, A History Researcher and first-time contributor50.90.225.241 (talk) 02:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Philadelphia Union/ Doops Nickname
It's common knowledge, featured in countless merchandise, and referenced nonstop by the team, how do you even provide sources/citations for a nickname anyways. Do you even pay attention to the team and/or league? Or do you just go to random pages that were recently updated?

it was my little son ,,,,,,,,who made the edit as he saw edit option thr,,,,,,,,,,sorry bro it was very nice of you will tc for next time  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.197.220.210 (talk) 08:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Two problems:

 * Your bot doesn't understand ref escape tags and is creating red links in the References section (desktop view): https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clonaid&diff=770902378&oldid=770883272
 * Your bot thinks that when a "Criticism" section is consolidated to other sections that a large amount of criticism was removed:: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brilliant_Light_Power&diff=770902178&oldid=770880347

Sincerely, talk2siNkarma86—Expert Sectioneer of Wikipedia 22:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Sending you some WikiLove!
I apologize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.44.218 (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

my edit
Thanks for the welcome! But no, I don't feel welcome in fact, because two dudes immediately started threatening me when I joined. It's my personal goal to edit things which have anti-woman content in order to correct the historical record. I am a historian. It does history no favors to have the Bernie Bros painted as victims when they harassed thousands of women with demeaning comments. That isn't biased. It's factual. The word misogyny belongs there. Eclune (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

civil
Is it civil to threaten me with vandalism? Please let me know the bro got the same message. Eclune (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * For adding unsourced defamatory content to a wp:BLP, it would be considered quite acceptable. There is lots of wp:vandalism on Wikipedia. Unfortunately we wp:RCPers don't have enough time to spend time with attempting helping individuals. So, they get wp:templated. Please reply on your talk page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

the bernie page
Well actually-the word "perjorative" is unsourced too. That isn't considered inflammatory language but misogynistic-- an accurate term which better explains why they GOT a perjorative nickname -- is out of bounds? The paragraph is misleading and inaccurate: to describe the bros as "intense" when they routinely told women on the internet that they should be raped and murdered and left to die, called them cunts and bitches and whores because they were VOTING FOR ANOTHER CANDIDATE is exactly what misogyny IS. You are perpetuating it. Congratulations. Have a nice day. Eclune (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Stagg Chili redirected to Hormel
There is a notice that Stagg Chili should merge into Hormel. Even more so, the article on here was just too short and not so vague (the article on the Hormel website has a lot more vagueness of it), it should really merge or be deleted. Before this ever gets removed, it better be redirected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.6.187.239 (talk) 23:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * As you did not mention with an wp:edit summary as to why you removed it, I restored it. Please feel free to redirect it again, preferably with an edit summary. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Is or was?
So technically it's "is an amendment". But that's very misleading considering that it's 154 years old, and not likely to get ratified (well, it wasn't before the 11/8 disaster, anyway). So I suggest using past tense, with an explanation that it is still (technically) pending ratification. BMJ-pdx (talk) 15:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not undo your edit; SMP0328 did. The page history has the newest edits on top. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

edit to Zita Martins
Dear Jim, my name is Zita Martins and I have just edited the content of my own page!!! I would appreciate if you keep the Edits I just did as the previous version was not correct or contained information I do not want to share.

Kind regards Zita Martins zita_martins@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.95.65.30 (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Re. EHR = MAMA
What if: electron hole recombination is basically the same as matter-antimatter annihilation? Specifically the way electron holes behave as slower than electrons and more massive suggests that the same physics might apply? If so then I may just have proved by analogy that the hypothesis about antimatter being time reversed matter circa 1949 by Feynman is essentially correct.

Am working on a paper right now which outlines my hypothesis and could be a quantum leap towards a theory of everything. Also by extension this allows for antigravity to be generated on the desktop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.46 (talk) 05:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That would be original research, which we don't use. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * - you type a lot faster than I... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Salvation Ministries
The information about the church is not updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichieBest (talk • contribs) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

re: Difference feminism
Jim, I am confused as to why you said that I did not "explain fully enough" why I made the changes I made. I left extensive explanation. Unless you have substantive problems with my reasoning there, I would appreciate if you would restore my edit. Menthesanscafeine (talk) 10:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You removed 1,600+ bytes of text without any explanation in the wp:edit summary. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * the wikipedia guidelines state that if there is not enough room in an edit summary to explain the edit, the user may do so in the talk section. That is what I did. I should have left an edit summary, and I apologize for that, but it was a mistake—however, the fact remains that the edits I made are needed and adding to the quality of the article. The relevant question is do you actually have a problem with the CONTENTS of my edit? If not, you need to restore it, or I will.Menthesanscafeine (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Then please add "See talk page" on the ES. Perhaps a overly simple explanation in the ES as well. People are unlikely to scan the talk page for every unexplained edit. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 00:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Miami Dolphins 50 Greatest Players
I got your message, about the section I wanted to add to the Dolphins page about the 50 greatest Dolphins announced back in 2015.

I dont know how to include the link/reference to it, but I can provide it for you here if you would liek to do it. I think ts important to add to the page.

Heres two of them: if you want to use either or http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolphins_in_depth/2015/12/miami-dolphins-top-50-players-of-all-time.html http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolphins_in_depth/2015/12/miami-dolphins-top-50-players-of-all-time.html

Thanks. JG (75.97.200.143 (talk) 06:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC))

re: Liquid rocket propellant
Hi Jim, I just saw your comment with regard to my edit of Liquid rocket propellant. The section I removed was a word-for-word repetition of the section that appeared directly above it and was pretty clearly a mistaken insertion which should be removed. I'll try to be more explicit with edit summaries in the future. Could you re-review it and consider undoing your reversion? Or otherwise guide me on appropriate action here. I'm a newbie and am unfamiliar with the normal process here. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSovereign (talk • contribs) 06:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

C.N.Annadurai
The respective leader is a Atheist and the Orator of atheist propoganda. This is very bad that some sinister forces mentioned him as Deist. This is the mattee to condemn. Sure,I will make this big issue in Public forum and take this to the DMK exe. President M. K. Stalin ans request him to arrange patrol wing to patrol the non-sense like this.

Periyarist (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

reply
Hi, I'm Antonythasan Jesuthasan — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShobasakthiA (talk • contribs) 08:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Re: The "Jim" problem in Wikipedia(?)
"Hello Jim I added a link to one of the non-believer's webpages ... a "Stella Star Lore" woman who lives on the Tweed Volcano area of NSW, on the coast up near the Queensland Border.

She has masses of stuff.

You then re-deleted saying that was not a reliable source.

Well then how do you suggest adding to Wikipedia that not all Australian Aborigines (or others) believe in the Out of Africa theory.

I myself am an orthodox science believer and I do believe in out of Africa theory and that we arise by evolution and NOT by any form of special creation .. and also I do not believe we in any way came from any form of star people or aliens.

Yet some do believe all those alternative things and do think Australian Aborigines arose in Australia and not in Africa or anywhere else.

Even though I do not agree with them I also think it should not be censored out of existence on Wikipedia the fact that some Australian Aborigines or others do hold such "odd" or "nutty" beliefs.

But if links to anything they say will always be erased because they are stated to be "unreliable sources" -- and then linkless articles will be deleted because they have no citations the whole thing becomes Catch 22.

What is the work-around, please?

Regards, John (Geologist)

58.173.27.252 (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * If everyone's "alternate theory" where their people came from were to be added to this page, there would be no room for the topic. There has to be thousands versions or more. Perhaps it should go on creationism, one of these pages: Category:Creation myths or its own page? It is not the topic of Out of Africa I and I don't think it belongs there. If you disagree, please feel free to start a discussion on talk:Out of Africa I
 * What? You don't believe that some ancient astronaut orbiting a planet hundreds of light years away flushed their toilet and the solar wind blew the desiccated dust to our planet? i.e. panturdia? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * ^^^^ I knew it! -Roxy the dog. bark 12:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Miller Beach (also Aetna (Gary))
This is just the latest in a long series of IP's that have been changing Miller from neighborhood to community. I grew up in that area and ever since the 60s, it has been a local sentiment that Miller and Aetna are not actually a part of Gary. I'm sure these edits today are just a further part of that. This has been going on for the entirety of the 5 years I've been here and I'm pretty sure there is just one human behind it. It spread to Aetna just today, with the content being rearranged to put greater emphasis on the neighborhood's ancient history as an independent town. Can't help but think this relates to the fact that Miller and Aetna are the only two majority white neighborhoods in Gary, as all of Gary's neighborhoods (excepting downtown and the central district) were at one time independent towns. None of the IP'S have engaged and there is an open discussion on Miller's talk page. If memory serves me, you have a few more buttons to push than I. Please don't hesitate to use them and thanks for the eyes on it. John from Idegon (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Why don't you do a wp:RfPP? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Adjustments to Aton Edwards Bio
Hi Jim. I'm trying to clean up my partner Aton Edwards bio. I saw your note about a reference I left out. Could you point it out so I can look it up? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adnan Roy (talk • contribs) 07:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything that is/was tagged with . That is probably why it was removed in the first place. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok -- I'll figure this all out in the morning. Thank you Adnan Roy (talk) 07:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Sheryl Sandberg
Hey Jim, thanks for fixing the Sheryl Sandberg entry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdpedersen (talk • contribs) 07:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Each section should have its own references. Are you saying everything that was added was on that one The Hindu article? That is quite unusual. You can "reuse" references. See WP:NAMEDREFS. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Time Out citation
Hi Jim -

I amended a line in the entry on Time Out magazine, and you sent me a note asking me to cite a source. The source is me. I worked for the magazine under its editor - how do I cite that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C013:C000:CCCA:3811:DCB9:62FE (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't. Wikipedia does not use original research.  You need to cite a professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

I have already reported you colleague for mis-conduct and blaming the people who donate to this website for 'vandalising' an article. As stated, what I noticed was that the information stated was incorrect and therefore I feel its more relevant to label the current information that you are defending as vandalism.

Don't you dare lecture me on this when you are embarrassing yourself by defending false information without a source...you guys do this to lots of people and I will report you as well... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.194.62.13 (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

71.223.67.243 (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
This new information is historically accurate. I understand your duty to monitor. Dick London is my father and is sitting next to me. We have documented letters from the MLB commissioner letterhead and other docs to prove the added information. We dearly asked of you to post the new content.

71.223.67.243 (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Birthdate
Jacob is not 19 yet. Subuey (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The RS gives Jacob Barnett was born in 1998. By that, what can be said is that he is either 18 or 19. If you have RS for a valid birthdate, please change it. Jim1138 (talk) 03:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The RS also mentions the date. Subuey (talk) 01:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Then add his birthday and change the template:birth year and age to template:birth date and age. Out of curiosity, why did you do this? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subuey (talk • contribs) 03:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The edit history is very clear and admins don't have the access rights to change it. You probably did it by accident then. Anyway, please feel free to add Barnett's birth day and change the age template. Jim1138 (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * How could I have done it by accident that doesn't make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subuey (talk • contribs) 04:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, sometimes text gets selected by accident such (with a PC a shift-PgDn will do the trick) and it will be removed when the first letter is typed. From my viewing others' edits, it happens quite often. The edit made by the account "Subuey" is shown here: diff. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

What is the issue?
I'm not sure why you keep rejecting the edits. But this is great new information that needs to out there about the mite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.81.209 (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Serious safety concern
Jim, the membership information is not freely available or public. I have removed the members list from our official website, this should serve as proof that I am a member of the band. The membership list was partially old and out of date. Despite being out of date there is still a serious safety concern and by denying this edit you are putting 18 people at serious risk of attack. Please allow this edit to go through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brassfan02909 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

why i did that
Listen back when 2011 i was rooting for the bears to go into the playoffs only to lose to green bay witch i was crying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.97.210 (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I just want to let you know that I removed the canvassing notice and our discussion that you left on my talk page, since I was not "canvassing". I specifically chose Betty to join the discussion because throughout the weeks that I have been editing here, I have seen how constructive an reliable her actions are (some examples given here are reverting vandalism, warning vandals and resolving content disputes on the relevant talk page). Watching and observing all this, I decided to pick Betty because I think she would be a suitable candidate to join a Rfc on something so high-risk (such as the block message). Just letting you know. 120.155.53.171 (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

About a college
How to write a article on College College have a reliable reference website also Alom h siddiquey 05:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddiquey (talk • contribs)

who cares wikipedia doesn't even make sense im only 9 and you bein mean — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.114.8 (talk) 07:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

You are misunderstanding my edits
Please read WP:OVERLINK. It is not vandalism. Argentina Sweden (talk) 07:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Sean hannity drop out of college twice by his own admitance on his show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.98.187.59 (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

My Recent WTOG Edits Were Of Good Intention But Incorrectly-Executed
Yes, I most assuredly made mistakes in my attempts at editing the WTOG article. I wanted to cite proof (from the RabbitEars.info links) that WTOG now provides a full-market simulcast of Telemundo-affiliated WRMD-CD as a third sub-channel (and also cite the RabbitEars.info links to the two translators too) but must have made a syntax error of some kind that wiped out a significant amount of information within the article. As I frantically scrambled to correct the matter, you must have beat me to it and fixed the error yourself, erasing my notation of the third sub-channel simulcast of WRMD-CD on WTOG-DT3. When I attempted to submit my correction changes, Wikipedia wouldn't let me so when I reloaded the article on a new tab, I noticed the article had been reverted back and I had a message from you. I finally found a way to adequately-cite the existence of WTOG-DT3, as well as providing the RabbitEars.info links for the two translator stations.64.39.94.248 (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

serbian army
this is real serbian army equipment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.249.112 (talk) 10:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Mystery Diners revision response
I got your message and I didn't notice any vandalized parts while I was fixing some of the episodes. It took me most of the day to get them fixed before the revision. I don't know what was vandalized, but I might have to copy-paste the episode information from the revision that I was working on. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * My apology on wasting your time here. I really blew it. I misunderstood the IP's edits. The IP before you was adding something which seemed too bizarre. But it was accurate. I restored the previous edit on Mystery Diners. I think your edits are intact. Here is the diff between your second and first edits. Note: your first edit is on the right, not the left. It looks quite close. I'm impressed with your consistency! If I had done that, it would look like it was edited by Dr. Jeckyll then Mr. Hyde. Again, my apology. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

What does this mean?
Hello it's me again. On your user page there is a box with "Level 2" written on it, and underneath says 7.98 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot. Also on this talk page there is a rocket on the top bar with a small "2" next to it. First of all, what is "level 2"? Secondly, who is EnterpriseyBot? 120.155.53.171 (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Also when I clicked on this "rocket" I got a new edit section that looked like this:

What does this mean? 120.155.53.171 (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Why were my edits reverted
I noticed in the Online Dating Sites there were not many links to gay dating sites so I added links. Why were they inappropriate so I can know in the future?

Starnexus (talk) 06:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, several of the categories on wp:What Wikipedia is not apply: Not a means of promotion, Not a repository of links, Not a directory, Not a networking service, etc. It's best for people to use a search engine and find it on their own. If some were allowed on, probably everyone would want free publicity. On Wikipedia, such links fall under the general category of spam. It is a rather constant battle to keep spam links down to a minimum. They do leak through sometimes and are removed sooner or later. If a spam website gets added enough, it is added to the wp:spam blacklist which makes prevents linking unless specifically approved. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Ryan Braun Civil Lawsuit
Jim,

HoustonRed here. You wrote me a message in December, I just saw that you agreed that the civil lawsuit section on the Ryan Braun page did not contribute to the overall content of the article, and you stated that you would leave its disposition to me. Accordingly, I will remove the civil lawsuit section. I have attempted, through time and some more mature consideration, to find some relevance between the civil lawsuit section and the entire page as a whole. Try as I may, when reviewing the article in its entirety, combined with the substance of the civil lawsuit section, I am having great difficulty delineating precisely how the lawsuit section even is relevant to Braun himself or would provide a reader with greater insight into Braun as a person or a professional. As an observer of the "newsworthiness" of the civil lawsuit saga, I was inclined to provide contribution to the page in that regard, but upon further review, as well as your input on the issue, I find that the section has taken on a life of its own and discusses ancillary or collateral matters which are not really contributing to Braun's wikipedia page. As such, I will remove it. If there are any problems or objections, please give me a shout.

Warmest Regards, Red — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoustonRed (talk • contribs) 04:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Reuben sandwich
A message from you just popped up on Wikipedia when I opened it. In it you claim I made an inappropriate edit to the Reuben sandwich page.

I'm not a Wikipedia editor, nor does anyone use this computer besides me. I do believe you were somehow mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:4:803:0:0:0:A3 (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (Left on their talk page as well, just in case they are moving between IPs): Internet service providers assign IP addresses to their customers, and some of these are temporary. These are called dynamic IPs.  Usually, this is why some people get messages about other people's edits.  However, your IP address is static, which means that it is the IP address that you used last month.  Someone using this IP address did make an inappropriate edit last month.  It is still possible that someone is connecting to your wifi without you knowing it, but we can't really distinguish between anonymous users, just their IP addresses (see WP:BROTHER for more information).