User talk:Jim1138/Archive 5

Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues
Yes, that was a mistake (a pretty bad one). I added my support, and somehow a lot of stuff got deleted. Anyways, as you said, it was restored, and I wrote my support again, so it should be good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Activism1234 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Especially in light of the aparently malicious competitive removal of Verbal Ink

Hoooorrayyyyy, you got a barn starr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yip-hee-hooray-ha-ha!

Sorry Jim, this was the last one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakita (talk • contribs) 08:39, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Erebus haunted house
Hello Jim1138, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Erebus haunted house, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 14:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Your input is requested
Hi, I noticed you have recently edited the Jerry Macaluso article. There has been an IP that has been constantly removing "promotional" information and adamantly wants the article deleted or merged. could you please reply to their section on the talk page of the article, input from a more experienced editor will surely help. Thanks,  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 16:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings
Thanks for reverting the dodgy edits on my talk page + everyone else! Just wanted to let you know your good work isn't going unnoticed :P P0150neD   r1Ce        asian  23:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

IP
Thanks my friend!  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  23:53, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Revert
Thanks :) -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 14:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Regarding TRUSTe Page - Privacy Violation
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHMCS

WHMCS LTD: Truste user: Proof: http://www.whmcs.com/about/privacy-policy/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.102.49.66 (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Alright Jimster whats up my son? How is life treating you these days? 16:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty543 (talk • contribs)

JovanAndreano on WP:ANI
Hello.

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved : Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Thank you.

Omar-Toons (talk) 18:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy too old?
I think you misunderstand deletion policy. (And don't let me being a "mere" IP editor fool you. I'm not a newbie, so please don't treat me like one.) Nothing in the policy pages says anything about speedy deletes having an expiration based on article age. The only standards are whether or not they meet certain content criteria. Though I've been around the block, I made sure to double-check that I was using the right process before doing it. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_process and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion You'll find that none of them say a thing about pages being too old to speedy delete. I'm not going to put the tag back until you get back to me, because I'm not looking to start an edit war over something so silly. --76.180.172.75 (talk) 04:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I undid my removal of the speedy deletion template. Good luck!  Jim1138 (talk) 04:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Wow! Thank you for such a quick response. I didn't expect such speed (no pun) or such instant understanding. You should get a barnstar just for actually being open to the occasional trout! Lots and lots of people say they are but few follow through in true spirit. You seriously floored me and earned a LOT of respect in my eyes. It takes some real integrity to so quickly and simply turn about. Thank you again. You are one of the good ones. (Holy! You even caused an edit conflict revising to say it was done. Seriously, you deserve an award.) --76.180.172.75 (talk) 04:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, In STiki somehow it showed the vandalism that you fixed but showed that you caused them. I apologize.  JamisonGuestbookUserboxes   11:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Saghal
I hope I can persuade to stop this, he's making a mess, renaming computer games like Civilization because he thinks they should be spelled Civilisation, etc. Maybe you could reinforce me at his talk page. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Coleman 1RR
Please note that as Coleman's notability relates to her work on abortion and mental health issues, it falls under the Abortion-related General Sanctions, and is restricted to one revert per user per 24 hours. Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Changes on Al-Ghazali
Hi there! Have you read my comment before editing the page? Imam Al-Ghazali was an Islamic Scholar, in Islam it's forbidden taking or drawing pictures of any human beings thus, it would be rather disrespectfull from you to Him putting his picture on the wikipedia, please familiarize yourself with his works, try to understand the essence of his works that would be much beneficial to everyone, please write to me for any feedback you are most welcomed! thank you )
 * Please see wp:notcensored. Wikipedia is not an Islamic organization and is therefore not subjected to Islamic law or rules.  Please do not remove images from Wikipedia due to Islamic "laws".  Jim1138 (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * thank you Jim1138 for your reply, i totally understand that Wikipedia is not an Islamic organization, but you must understand that putting images of the people who are adherents of the Islamic faith, infringes their rights privacy, thus you cannot put their pictures without the consent of the people of Islamic faith, i hope you understand, it's you who want's to know about Imam Al-Ghazali, and it's in your interest to know more about him, but it's not permissible that you put his pictures in the public place and infringing his rights of privacy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majilis (talk • contribs) 15:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Come join the Ainu Task Force!
Greetings, saw your edits at Ainu people and thought you might like to know that we just founded the WikiProject Japan/Ainu task force. Hope to see you on the Members list! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:47, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

3RR
Note that you have exceeded this at Al-Farabi, and this is a bright-line rule. I don't think the reasons for reverting are an exception however I may fell about them, so I suggest you stay away from the article for a day. I've warned the other editor I will block them if they continue. Dougweller (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * You're welcome. I'm just an anti-vandal hack.  Please thank some real editors; they are the ones that need the appreciation!  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page... much appreciated. ... disco spinster   talk  01:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Just because there isn't a note doesn't mean its wrong.
I see you putting notes all over the place in your articles? No, you don't always put notes. I am new to Wiki so I cant put notes. http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/ultima-hora/jose-socrates-mais-1-ano-em-paris But this is a fact backed by the best selling portuguese news paper and I don't recall that just because you don't put a note you are immediately wrong or clipped out. That sort of low-life editing is typical of people that just life to be right, even when they're wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.118.126 (talk) 02:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That is a good start. Just put   Wikipedia requres sources wp:rs for credibility.  Unsourced material, especially controversial or unusual (Former PM of Portugal studying in France?!?) needs to be cited.  Or, it will likely be removed.  See wp:citing sources and wp:rs for more information.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok... now the link is there! How controversial is a prime minister going to college? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.118.126 (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

José Sócrates: 1 more year in Paris

Former Prime Minister Jose Socrates decided to stay another year in Paris, France where he is studying political science at Sciences Po Institute advances the weekly 'Sun'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.118.126 (talk) 02:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

New Section
99.121.4.72 (talk) 02:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)i am sorry for the misunderstanding. the reason for the deletion of certain sections of the article is because the content of them are harmful and misleading. i know this for sure because when i looked up the link that was attached to the part that said that smith's wife was wanted by the interpol, i found this to be incorrect since the newspaper article did not provide factual information and it is biased as the writer was once issued a restraining order by smith's wife once. i know that it was probably not your intention to post that type of information. please do not edit it with that section again since it is harmful and deceitful.

User.Lcjdoj87/sandbox
You want to read this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.237.209 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Garbage like this doesn't belong on Wikipedia.71.72.237.209 (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Refactoring comments.
Do not refactor other editors comments like you did here. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;   &copy;  22:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * How was that a refactor? I simply added.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You are correct. Read the wrong diff, a silly mistake on my part.  It was the talk page owner that refactored.  My apologies.   Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  23:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: 111.68.111.194
Hi Jim, thanks for your message... I decided to reply nonetheless. My decision to remove that reference at Nutmeg was based on the fact that I recently cleaned up behind someone leaving a number of similar reference, only to notice that someone else had removed them afterwards... describing them as random spammish additions. The removal summaries made perfect sense to me, so it was the logic I went with upon detecting ongoing activities of similar appearance. I'll be on the lookout for more of these as I surf about. Thanks for the heads up! :) -- WikHead (talk) 07:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Citing diffs in user warnings
Hi Jim1138, I noticed your intervention with the IP user editing at Lance Armstrong. I was curious, what parameters do you use to cite diffs in the user warning template? Rinkle gorge (talk) 05:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I use wp:huggle which does it automatically. However, you need wp:rollback rights to use it.  You can copy / paste the diff from the address bar.  Slow going that way.  If you want rollback rights, you need to do a certain amount of vandalism patrolling first.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. You might not know the answer to this question, but I'll ask anyways: if I were to paste the diff URL into the warning template, do you know if it would look something like this: Page ? Rinkle gorge (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think it will add anything. See: Template:Uw-vand1  You can always test things out by using the "Show preview" button instead of "Save page".  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! Rinkle gorge (talk) 21:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Rocker_(subculture)
Hello, I just delete a topic that I've done to replace it with a more complete and informative, ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisehelp (talk • contribs) 01:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeshivah College Australia
Are you an Editor for Wikipedia?

If so, I would like to discuss the page with you.

Regards,

Ortha. Ortha-doxa (talk) 01:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I am an editor along with 7 billion others. Everyone is / can be an editor. Some are more familiar with Wikipedeia than most.  It would appear that the incident at Yeshivah College, Australia is well documented and ongoing.  The issue has been discussed somewhat on talk:Yeshivah College, Australia, but never resolved.  For a comparison, look at Penn State University including (probably) talk:[[Penn State University.  I am sure that many would like for that to disappear.  The amount of information could probably be reduced, but some should stay. The opposite side of the coin is called whitewashing which tends to be a problem as well. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Jim. I am new to this... :)

Ortha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ortha-doxa (talk • contribs) 05:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Vinicius de moraes
Thanks for the source about Vinícius de Moraes, i'll try to add it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.32.179.14 (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Request for a new set of eyes
Hello! Can you take a look at this and see if you are in agreement that the article has issues with both CopyVio of this and issues with WP:WPSCH/AG? Unfortunately, I made some edits of my own, so it's difficult to engage without getting into a content dispute. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 04:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Message given.  Jim1138 (talk) 05:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Tgeairn (talk) 05:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Sceptrophasma hispidulum
Hi, I moved this article back to article space, and tidied it up a bit. It may just be a stub, but I can't imagine how any species of animal, even an insect, can fail on the notability criteria. Feel free to get back to me if you think I'm incorrect  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism
I wish to join an anti-vandalism task force, are you a person to talk to? ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not really. Have you looked at Vandalism and Recent changes patrol?  Good luck!  If you find a discussion group, let me know!  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

City University of Seattle
Thanks for noticing this very situation. I've received an OTRS request from them, and the situation is a little complicated, as some but not all of the references are usable, and the criticism is a little over-emphatically written, as often happens. But of course we are not going to remove the basic material, or de-emphasise it as far as they would like. And, as you've noticed, there is a good deal of rewriting of spam that is needed. I'm used to doing this, and I will.  DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Union Rags
75.185.211.64 is being quite persistent and pesky in hisher "contributions". I have little experience of blocking, but I think this looks like a good case. 00:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerboy1966 (talk • contribs)
 * He is on wp:aiv. Awaiting an admin to do the cleanup.  Check wp:block for more info on what and how.  Be careful before making a block request!  Please remember to sign your comments!  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wooops I never, well hardly ever, forget to sign my comments. I am someone who just writes and edits articles. Horse racing is usually a quiet backwater of wikipedia where we just get on with our hobby in a polite and co-operative way. When someone like the above IP editor pitches in I find it hard to handle, so thanks for your help.  Tigerboy1966   00:29, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Copy
The page was extensively copied from www.cbec.gov.in.(117.192.132.255 (talk) 08:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC))
 * Please leave an wp:edit summary. What I see is someone deleting good sourced content and references for no apparent reason. I am not about to take the time to figure out why it was deleted.  Suggestion an edit summary of "removed content copied from www.cbec.gov.in" would help considerably.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful
hi, so you can speak hindi also, great.thnk god at last found someone. i'll ask my doubts in hindi after all no one gonna get this 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 14:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I speak all sorts of languages :) Sometimes vandalism is obvious, sometimes I'm oblivious. Just curious, which of my reverts are you referring to?  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * "Sometimes vandalism is obvious" not getting it. can you become quite descriptive. well wishes :) 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Possessives
Thanks for looking into that. I just figured you were watching Velella's talk page. Zagal e jo^^^ 04:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Phallic McGee
Go ahead and look at the history of that article, this was long accepted fact. At someone point someone removed this... I could take photos of the DVD if you need them. 71.237.162.218 (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * wp:blp requires an exceptionally reliable source for that. You did not include one.  Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't it be the person who reverted it FROM that content be the one requiring a source? Not me.. since I am reverting their edit... ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.162.218 (talk) 03:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not if it was removed due to lack of a source. Jim1138 (talk) 03:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * How about this one ? http://askville.amazon.com/Romany-Malco-learn-play-hockey-part-Love-Guru/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=10589013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.162.218 (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A search of the page didn't show any "cum" nor "dumpster". Also, the content can be entered by anyone, so it is not considered a reliable source (as is Wikipedia). Jim1138 (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

copyright
Are you seriously intentionally restoring material that is a direct and explicit copyright violation? I'll post links there, but in the mean time, reblank the content. I'd do it myself but have already reverted that page 3 times today. I have no idea what policy to link you offhand but I'm positive that intentionally restoring copyright violations isn't acceptable. On every page I've edited, all creative content (aka the episode descriptions) has been directly cut and paste from other websites that do not operate under free licenses. 24.7.103.207 (talk) 04:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Having looked further at 3rr, removing a direct and obvious copyright violation is an exception to it. So I'm reblanking the pages, and listing them at WP:CP.  You have intentionally restored direct copyright violations, which is confusing, against policy, and generally silly - please don't do so in the future. 24.7.103.207 (talk) 04:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Please Help
Dear Jim1138, I am updating the content for Al Ahliyya Amman University and you keep reverting it. Can you please guide me to update my content within the limit of Wikipedia regulations. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAU PR (talk • contribs) 06:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey jim, I'm just deleting my own comment appartley it pissed off some people. just rather get rid of it and cause no problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwsc56 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Web access management revert
HP IceWall SSO is one of the most authentic SSO impementation and market leader in Japan.(A © 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. product) It was developed and relased in 1997 For more information please visit product website

http://h50146.www5.hp.com/products/software/security/icewall/eng/sso/

I guess this will be sufficient for you to allow me to add an entry about HP IceWall SSO in this wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by IceWall Promoter (talk • contribs)
 * Avoid doing so yourself. Your username and what you wrote above suggest a strong conflict of interest here. An article with that as its content would be quickly deleted; an edit with that content would quickly get deleted.
 * Here's what I suggest:
 * Get a new username (WP:RENAME)
 * Be ready to work with other editors to make sure the conflict of interest doesn't affect your edits. It may be best to allow another editor to do so yourself.
 * Third-party documentation is encouraged but not required.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

What is your problem?
I am posting factual information. Do you work for the government? Are you censoring me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.89.158.120 (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm still learning the ropes of comuinicating on this site. I'm writing about my edits to the "aspergers Are US" page becuase though I appreciate the justice of the previous guys 108-etc. effort to acknowdlge my involvement in the founding of teh group, I realize he is more of a reckless hacker or dare say troll like, I then realized that though my additions had no backed up sources like they should, even though they are close to the truth, I thought the better of it and deleted the whole contraversy page becuase I no longer want to be asssociated with that group and the article section contained sensitive personal data that left me vulnerable. So hence why the article is as it is now, don't undo the changes this time.

Thanks

SkipLarry100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkipLarry100 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Byron King-Noel, Viscount Ockham
Dear Jim1138, are you able to help with this page? It is being vandalised on a daily basis and keeping on top of it is becoming tiresome! Many thanks (Kazzi03 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC))
 * That probabaly is classifiable as a content dispute and lack of reliable sources. It does seem rather off-topic.  I asked the IP to discuss it in talk.  You might try starting a conversation in talk:Byron King-Noel, Viscount Ockham Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

YOU MY FRIEND ARE THE VANDAL. YOU TIRESOME TROLL. YOU HAVE INTERFERED WITH SO MANY PAGES ON WIKIPEDIA THAT YOU MUST HAVE PLENTY OF TIME ON YOU HANDS, NOT TO MENTION A POSSIBLE MENTAL CONDITION. YOU ARE SUCH A BAD MANNERED FRUSTRATING PERSON. I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH JIM WHY DON'T YOU TALK TO THE PEOPLE CONTRIBUTING ON PAGES BEFORE MAKING EDITS AND DELETIONS. ENGLISH MANNERS ARE ALWAYS BEST. MAYBE INSTEAD OF VANALISING THEIR POSTS YOU COULD OFFER CONSTRUCTIVE ADVICE. SHARON. DEPT OF MODERN HISTORY, OXFORD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.94.232 (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree Kazzi03 is a pest. He is pseudolearned and has very little to offer with real substance. He gets great gratification in posting inane articles that are of little interest (have a look at the views he gets) He also interferes with other posts and endlessly creates edits and deletions.He chats incessantly with other trolls. I agree he must have plenty of time on his hands. He is just a troublesome troll. Does this guy have any real live flesh and bone friends? Or does he just live in cyberland? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.94.232 (talk) 02:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * So, why do you keep adding that material? It does not seem relevant to the article title.  If you are a scholar, it would seem that you would be compelled to add references.  Yet you you have not done so even though information on how to do so has been added to your talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Nmate
Please help me to make Nmate stop these edits:  etc Bozo1789 (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there any doubt that "Zboril Are Descendants Of Ilona Szilágyi " is not vandalism? Bozo1789 (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Above user is an obvious sockpuppet of User:Iaaasi whose edits are possible to revert on sight under WP:BAN. I am reverting edits made by the previously confirmed socpuppets of the site-banned user Iaaasi, and Bozo1789 began restoring them one by one with which he betrayed that he is also a sockpupet of Iaaasi.--Nmate (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in defiance of a ban. By banning an editor, the community has determined that the broader problems, due to their participation, outweigh the benefits of their editing, and their edits may be reverted without any further reason. This does not mean that obviously helpful edits (such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism) must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor, but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." Bozo1789 (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons" Ada Kaleh was never part of Serbia, it is not a verifiable information, but a false one Bozo1789 (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

That is the only way to be possible to enforce WP BAN at persistent sockpuppeter, and any banned users have nothing to do with editing Wikipedia.--Nmate (talk) 09:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your battleground mentality is at an odius level, you prefer to restore vandalism "Zboril Are Descendants Of Ilona Szilágyi", just to revert me. You need a consult Bozo1789 (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Badshah Munir Bukhari
Dear Jim1138, I hope you are well. I see that you very helpfully edited the Badshah Munir Bukhari page today. I have since had to highlight issues with this page on the WP:BLPNB. I am unsure about the assertion made by another editor on the Talk Page that the unhelpful and inaccurate edits are being made by the subject himself, or whether that is even relevant. But it does seem that someone wants continuously to create an inaccurate bio. Any chance you could please have another look? Thank you very much.George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 11:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes the UofP website lists him as Mr. His book review lists him as Dr. though it does not translate well via [url=http://translate.google.com google]. Perhaps UofP should be notified?  If you want to recommend the article for deletion, I believe that you need to post here: Articles for deletion.  I don't think that it will be deleted from WP:BLPNB Probably should mention on WP:BLPNB about the deletion request as well.  I warned the IP about his error.  Thanks for taking care of that!  Jim1138 (talk) 17:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear Jim1138, thank you kindly for having a look at this. When I started editing the page recently it really did read like a fan page. It has become a lot better. But, as you say, the issue of notability still needs to be looked at. Thanks again. You are a star. Regards,George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)