User talk:Jim16/Archive01

Hello Jim, could you explain why you blanked User talk:66.17.116.148? Thanks. — Mar. 12, '06 [19:04] 
 * Hello again. I just noticed [ this inappropriate message]. I've decided to give you a little while to calm down before making further edits. — Mar. 12, '06 [19:08] 

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 19:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry Jim, but you do not have full rights to your user talk page. It is considered Vandalism by wikipedia policy to blank warnings from your talk page. &rArr;   SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  22:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 22:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Removing warnings from your talk page is also considered vandalism (see: WP:Vandalism). Buchanan-H e  rmit™ .. CONTRIBS .. SPEAK!  22:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Buchanan-H e  rmit™ .. CONTRIBS .. SPEAK!  03:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Victoria Newman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Radio Kirk   talk to me  18:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Don't apologize to me, talk to User:RadioKirk. — Apr. 22, '06 [12:34] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>

Re: JIM16
''Hello, RadioKirk, this is Jim16. I would just like to apologize for all of the vandalism that I have inflicted over the past few months. It was childish, I know. I would also like to apologize for personally attacking you on your talk page. Get back to me as soon as you can. Thanks. Jim16 12:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)''
 * I appreciate that, thank you. What would you like to discuss? Radio  Kirk   talk to me  17:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey Jim
I really hope that you keep improving the Policy Debate-related articles. However, a problem with that article when I last edited it (which I believe was quite a while ago&mdash;I apologize for the tone which probably characterized my edits) was that most of it was original research because it did not cite sources. The idea that you cannot run inherency with a disadvantage is an opinion, not a fact. If you would like to add it to the article, you have to attribute it to the author who says it. There are several ways you can do this. The archives of the Rostrum are online, many people right about debate arguments as well as culture in there. You could flip through one of the several books on debate which are listed in the references section of the Policy debate article, or you could find another published source.

Also, when writing about policy debate, keep in mind that norms and "rules" vary geographically. I see from your user page that you are from South Dakota, so I intuit that you cannot read inherency with a disadvantage there. When you write about debate issues, try not to universalize one perspective rather than write from a universal point of view.

Also, if you'd really like to know how to run inherency with a disad, its quite simple. Here are several ways off the top of my head: 1) The inherency argument need not claim that the plan has been done, merely that the affirmative harm has been solved, it's more than possible that the disadvantage links to the plan but not to whatever solved the affirmative harm 2) The disadvantage could be time sensitive. Doing the plan now might link to a politics disad but when it was done 3 years ago that scenario obviously didn't exist 3) Even if inherency does contradict the disad, the affirmative has to beat the inherency argument to win the round, so they cannot simply concede it to take out this disad.

Hope this helps. If you have any more questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to contact me. savidan(talk) (e@) 15:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Stock Issue
''Hello, this is Jim16 again. I would just like to discuss how to delete an article I created (called stock issue). I wish to delete it because I now realize that there is a similar article on Wikipedia, called stock issues. Thanks. Jim16 21:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)''
 * Hello! First, let me ask, please, that you put new messages at the very bottom of my talk page; it's easier to keep track that way.
 * As for your question, it's best in this case to redirect the page rather than delete it. Remove all the content from Stock Issue and replace it with  #REDIRECT Stock issues . That way, anyone who types "Stock Issue" will end up at the correct page anyway. Hope this helps. Radio  Kirk   talk to me  21:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism to my talk page
Thank you for the reversion. :) Radio  Kirk   talk to me  03:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)