User talk:JimDuncan21

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -- Scientizzle 04:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

GENITRAK
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Goodnightmush 04:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Goodnightmush 04:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on GENITRAK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Адам12901 Talk 05:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

GeniTrak
Hi, sorry about fumbling this entry. I have been a registered member of Wikipedia for some time under the logon JimDuncan and have contributed some information on other software products including MUFO. I created a new sign on today (JimDuncan21) because I had forgotten my password.

I was not aware that the site would decline a marketing document, but now that you have pointed that out to me I recognise the obvious logic and serious intent of the site to be an encyclopedia and not an advertising bulletin. Well done.

I edited the document on GeniTrak, removing the marketing statements and sticking to the proven facts. I would appreciate your review of the edited document and will accept any suggestions.

Can you reinstate the page as the basis for ongoing work in progress and i will get it right.

I have now read the pillars of wikipedia and understand the subject better

Thanks for your assistance.

(JimDuncan21 04:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC))

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GENITRAK"


 * You'll want to show the software is notable, per WP:SOFTWARE. If you are the same Jim Duncan mentioned in the article, please also read the conflict of interest guidelines.  - Aagtbdfoua 05:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: GENITRAK
Hey JimDuncan21, this is in response to your helpme on Talk:GENITRAK. Unfortunately, the article has two problems: (1) it was written like an advertisement for the product (2) the article fails to justify the notability of the software in question. Although you have removed many advertisement-like qualities from the article, the second problem remains. All articles on Wikipedia must be about notable subjects, supported by verifiable claims from reliable sources, which must be cited. If you feel that the article can be improved to satisfy these requirements by editing, please do so. If not, then the article will, unfortunately, be deleted soon. I hope this explanation helps. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 06:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)