User talk:JimGreen

Welcome!


Hello, JimGreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

re Economic Inclusivism

 * And again. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Economic Inclusivism (January 2)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Economic Inclusivism


A tag has been placed on Economic Inclusivism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. freshacconci talk to me  03:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This includes using Wikipedia as a soapbox to promote your own views or agenda.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

No original research
Mr Green, I am sorry you are having trouble, but Wikipedia is not for what you want to do: publish your original ideas. The copyright issue, while important to us, could be overcome by you making a formal release; but that would not help, because the real issue is that Wikipedia does not publish original work. It is worth reading the policy WP:No original research in full, but key passages are: "'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'" "'Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.'" See also Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)