User talk:Jimbolilly

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, Jimbolilly, made test edits on the page John Moncur which have been reverted or removed. If you did this, please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. If Jimbolilly is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Egghead06 (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to John Moncur
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Moncur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~ Nott Nott   let's talk! contrib 18:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey there. An actual written message from me instead of a template, here on Wikipedia we don't do original research. It's one of the three main tenets if you like to call it that way. You'll have to cite the claim by providing a verifiable source that has been published - if you can't the change doesn't belong on here. Saying that in good faith, and all editors have to learn. If you insist on making the edit despite this advice, I will not revert your edit and seek an admin to resolve the conflict instead. Hope you can understand :) ~ Nott Nott   let's talk! contrib 18:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)