User talk:Jimbrey

Copyright problems with Up the ridge
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Up the ridge, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Up the ridge appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Up the ridge has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Up the ridge and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Up the ridge with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Up the ridge.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. PTJoshua (talk) 18:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I see that the original text is available for distribution, with the condition that it should not be changed. This is a condition which wikipedia cannot accept, as anyone can edit here. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Hello Jimbrey. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Up the ridge, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

JamesBWatson (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thousand Kites


The article Thousand Kites has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article was stubbed because it was very adverty and cited only to primary sources. As it stands, it isn't a great deal of use and I'm unable to find any reliable secondary sources about it online. Time for it to go.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 06:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)