User talk:Jimdandie98

WWYO
The information you added to the WWYO page was been reverted due to lack of reliable third-party sources and because it violated WP:LINKFARM and WP:NOT. Please readd when you have reliable third party sources.

Also, it is not a good idea to create an account to continue to readd unsourced content to a page. This could be considered a violation of WP:SOCK. Thanks... Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 23:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's still in violation of WP:NOT. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 00:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your conflict of interest
Please read the guideline linked in the title of this section. Editing articles on subjects to which one is closely related is discouraged in an attempt to maintain the article's objectivity. If you have sourced (see WP:Identifying reliable sources) content that is notable (see WP:Notability), then go to the article discussion page and explain the content and sources. Let other editors add the content so that a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV) is assured for our readers. Regards  Tide  rolls  00:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Why are you continuing to edit against this project's guidelines? Do you understand that this behavior jeopardizes your editing privilege?  Tide  rolls  01:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your final warning
If you edit WWYO again without gaining consensus on the article's talk page, I will block your account.  Tide  rolls  02:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page WWYO has been reverted. Your edit here to WWYO was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/am970wwyo/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)