User talk:Jimmer18

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Romero (Entertainer) (December 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Megan Romero (Entertainer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jimmer18 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hirolovesswords&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jimmer18 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 17:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Davao Eagle Online


A tag has been placed on Davao Eagle Online, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.davaoeagle.com/advertise. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 09:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmer Ariate


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jimmer Ariate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Indiuser (talk) 09:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DavaoTourism


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on DavaoTourism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright and promotion
I've deleted the page because it contained copyright violations and promotion. I figured I should explain why this happened. The copyvio is the easiest part to explain: ultimately you inserted material that has been published on another website, which makes it a copyright violation. You've claimed that you own the rights to the content, but we cannot accept your say-so about this. You would have to file a ticket through WP:ORTS to prove that you are the legal copyright holder and that you give permission for Wikipedia to use the materials on Wikipedia. Until this happens we cannot accept copyrighted materials.

However there is still an issue with promotion on the page and it's spread out throughout the page to the point where you'd essentially have to re-write the entire article to make it appear non-promotional. This is another reason why Wikipedia discourages the use of copyrighted text, because in most instances the material is written to promote the subject (in this case a paper) to the reader. There wasn't one sentence in that article that wasn't promotional. If you do choose to re-write this, you need to leave out any words or phrases like "a community blog that highlights the pride of Southern Mindanao" or "Back then, Davao Eagle was just a simple blog that aimed to become trustworthy and a reputable source of contents about Davao on the Internet." None of that is acceptable per Wikipedia's NPOV policies. (WP:NPOV)

However beyond all of that I did also notice that there was an issue of notability as a whole. The blog/website does seem to exist, but I don't see where it would pass notability guidelines per WP:NWEB. You have to show where the website has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspapers and the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Megan Romero (Entertainer) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Megan Romero (Entertainer), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Megan Romero (Entertainer)


Hello, Jimmer18. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Megan Romero".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Reach Out to the Truth 23:07, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmer Ariate (Blogger)


A tag has been placed on Jimmer Ariate (Blogger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MereTechnicality (talk) 20:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmer Ariate


A tag has been placed on Jimmer Ariate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Redirect to Wikidata"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magbuwag ta Kay
Hello Jimmer18,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Magbuwag ta Kay for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Magbuwag_ta_Kay&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Your addition to Davao Eagle has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''If you are the copyright holder and wish to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent.'' — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Davao Eagle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davao Eagle, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Davao Eagle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)