User talk:JimmerFredette32

Welcome
Hello, JimmerFredette32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Joan Crawford have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GcSwRhIc (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Joan Crawford
I reverted your recent edit, tombstones aren't what we'd consider a WP:reliable source. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Regarding the Joan Crawford article again, simply stating that you have done research on a matter as you stated in this edit summary is not a reliable source. You must cite a reliable source when making an edit to content that is likely to be challenged. Further, the subject of Crawford's date of birth has been discussed at length on the article talk page (please see Talk:Joan Crawford). For whatever reason, the community decided to state 1905 as Crawford's date of birth. As a result, you must seek a new consensus on the article talk page if you want to get the date of birth changed. Thank you.  Pinkadelica ♣  21:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Please stop changing Joan Crawford's DOB. As stated above, consensus (right or wrong) is to list 1905 as her birth date. Further, citing a random source in an edit summary as you did here is not acceptable. Please seek a new consensus on the article talk page if you feel so strongly about this matter. Continuously changing the content without first seeking a new consensus and arguing your point via edit summaries is not productive and will likely end in you being blocked as your behavior is now bordering on disruptive. Thank you.  Pinkadelica ♣  05:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)