User talk:JimmyBucketslolol

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Liberty High School (Oregon). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Well, you falsely claimed you were only messing around on your talk page when you know full well, apparently, that you were vandalising Liberty High School (Oregon). --Yamla (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, I was aware,but you must understand I am confused because I had already been warned shortly after making that edit on Liberty High School (Oregon), so i assumed me making a joke on my talk page is what caused the block. I am sorry if you thought i was trying to hide the vandalism, i wasn't i just simply thought i had already been warned for that so i figured there was no need to address it. All i'm asking for is a second chance (I full well understand what I did to constitute a block and why Wikipedia see's this user as a threat of disruption) I personally think Wikipedia is a great site where i get a lot of my information and i don't want to be stripped of the right to contribute (positively) because of my past stupidity. if you still see error in this request please notify me, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBucketslolol (talk • contribs)
 * What contributions do you wish to make? Your reply does not need to be an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

I just want to be able to help any way I can. I wont go actively seeking typos or false facts to correct but if I do see one I want to be able to correct it and if I get this whole editing thing down maybe even contribute sections to articles that i'm knowledgeable on. because as stated previously i use Wikipedia a lot.

this is fair but i do have a question. is there anyway i can find out all the weird symbols and whatnot editors use in their edits because it all looks pretty confusing and i cant find any YouTube videos on it


 * Help:Wikitext will tell you all you need to know there, but you'll still need to suggest a specific positive edit you'd want to make. RedPanda25 15:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

You forgot to tell us what edit you'd make and you forgot to provide a source that meets WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

i need help on how to link a website but if im correct this should give the website ill be getting the citations from but if that doesnt work then here is the website i will use for esports news https://clashroyale.com/blog/esports/ and here is the website ill be using for other topics such as clan war updates and so on or this https://clashroyale.com/blog/release-notes/clan-wars-2-is-here.html please get back to me if i forgot to address one of the problems you asked me to.
 * That source is generally unsuitable because it is a primary source. WP:RS goes into more detail on this (and look, it's a bit of a subtle point). --Yamla (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

there is only one other source that covers CRL esports https://esports.clashroyale.com/finals/en
 * If there are no sources that satisfy WP:RS, you should not add the content to the article. Note again, though, primary sources (like the one you are using) are acceptable in limited circumstances; see specifically, WP:RSPRIMARY. In general, though, they should be avoided. --Yamla (talk) 19:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

i feel like when speaking about updates though having the game developers tell you what they added firsthand is best maybe primary sources aren't the best for certain topics but personally hearing firsthand what the game developers have added to their game is most reliable. but regarding the esports league info ill have to just pass on that topic. but as you can see in the clash royale page card info is not cited very well and i have a great secondary source to cite the card info for clash royale that has no relation to Supercell (video game company) or the clash royale company. https://www.deckshop.pro/card/list
 * Which part of WP:RS do you think deckshop.pro matches? A reliable primary source? Reliable secondary source? Reliable tertiary source? Unreliable source? --Yamla (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

assuming wikipedia is allowing a site similar to deckshop.pro where the information is set up in a more ease-of use way heavily relying on pictures to convey information along with text then i would say that deckshop is a reliable secondary source
 * I'm very sure that site wouldn't be considered reliable at Wikipedia. However, frankly I think this is evidence that JimmyBucketslolol is trying, making an effort to get there. I've previously reviewed an unblock request and declined it. To the next reviewing admin, you should consider that I think Jimmy is getting better. Not to the point that I'm immediately comfortable pushing for an unblock, but considerably better than when I declined the last unblock. --Yamla (talk) 20:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

thank you for noticing my efforts to prove im sorry for my past actions but for now im probably going to take a break from this unblock madness and just focus on school thank you though

it's been a while but you guys told me to give an article i could improve and i found one; Rainbow Six Siege uses the old names for the in-game game modes. even though its small i could change it to be what they are now.