User talk:JimmyButler/Archive 25

Teacher review
Mr. Butler i know it may be a little late for this but if you would teacher review the Royal Tern i would greatly appreciate it. --Captain kirkintosh (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Another Teacher Review, I had Davis look it over as well. I put it up for peer review and its been up for almost 2 weeks.... I'm just curious if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. Especially with the Peer Review. Stanfordbound 14 (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Use the power of the orange bar. Leave messages on user talk pages and ask them to go to the Peer Review.  That gets results much better than relying on some "system".  People appreciate direct requests and the squeeky wheel gets the oil.  Good luck.TCO (talk) 14:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Let yesterday be forever remembered...
We were on the front page yesterday! Today%27s_featured_article/January_4,_2012  00:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you see the loggerhead attracted a song parody, apparently with the article as a source. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Someone in class caught that yesterday and shared. Always nice to know your efforts are viewed. If you take a look at the traffic on that page I'm sure it is a significant number of viewers. Congratulations. I will email Tim and let him know. --JimmyButler (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Teacher Review
Will you please review Gambusia affinis? Patvac-chs (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Banker horse
Please see User_talk:Dana_boomer. Pumpkin Sky  talk  01:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

We're doing it
Hey Jimmy, remember me from a few years ago? We're finally doing an AP Biology Wikipedia project in Maine! Check out the new projects at: WP:APBAPST. It's far less ambitious than your project, but I've already got some good results - it's image based rather than article based. Good Times, Earthdirt (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

_ :-)

Hi There, welcome aboard. Again :) David D. (Talk) 22:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

And welcome (back) from me too. You did some RReally gRReat woRRk, and I'm looking forward to seeing you in action once again. I'd suggest a more random selection of articles, though, and not getting too stressed replicating all your efforts in just the one place. I find that attending to a batch of articles on English grammar is a great de-stressing strategy! Snalwibma (talk) 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

wb :)--Filll (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Good to make contact again. One day I'll revisit IntrotoEvo properly, read the whole thing with fresh eyes, see what it looks like, think about how it might be improved - and probably do nothing! But it's pretty good as it is. Congratulations to you, above all people. I notice that our friend A******** has made zero edits since 31 Jan. I presume it was a one-purpose sock of some sort. Meanwhile, I'm pretty busy IRL and just glancing at WP once in a while. Snalwibma (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Glad to see you punch in ... even if it’s only a glancing blow. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I couldn't find anywhere to put this so I'm just dumping this here. Your initiative is so very cool and I have immense respect for the idea. Not only is it fantastic in giving back contributions and teaching people to share knowledge in a community collaborative environment, but you're teaching the scientific method (fact checking, writing .etc). Good job Genjix (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:APBiology2010FA
Template:APBiology2010FA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 13:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:APBiology2009FA
Template:APBiology2009FA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Random question
I have been wondering what happened to the effort of wikipedia to get schools involved because it seemed like a great idea at the time and led to some great content but it seems to have died out. I remember you had a lot of success in creating great articles with your high school class, and I was wondering your thoughts on why that effort to get educators, universities, and high schools involved didn't go better. Also, thanks for all your hard work to make this a better encyclopedia and for sharing knowledge. I really appreciate it! Remember (talk) 11:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I responded to you on my talk page (talk) since you archived this. Long story short: Thanks for your efforts and your explanation. Remember (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)