User talk:JimmyCrow

Block
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for edit warring (yet again). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 06:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. You may not edit while logged out for the duration of your block. Accordingly, I've reset the runtime of your block to start from today. If you do so again, your block may be extended beyond 1 month. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ferran Jutglà, you may be blocked from editing. BRDude70 ( talk ) 13:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adama Traoré (footballer, born 1996). Nehme1499 22:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RossButsy (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. RossButsy (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello JimmyCrow. The complaint about you is at WP:AN3. You are risking a block for long term edit warring on football articles. There may still be time for you to reply to the complaint and agree to wait for consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Constant edit warring on a variety of articles, many previous blocks. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. Your edit history shows non-stop reverting of others. EdJohnston (talk) 23:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)