User talk:Jimmycracker

Welcome!

Hello,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! '''I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal &mdash; and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my talk page.'''

Additional tips:
 * Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
 * Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.  Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
 * You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
 * If your first language isn't English, try Contributing to articles outside your native language.

Happy editing! ‡  Jarlaxle   23:04, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

ghjg
ghjghj

Food for Thought
Imagine there was an article titled "Jimmycracker" with Biographical information, Contributions, etc, and a Controversy section. In your opinion, would it make sense for the incident in which I, a notable peer, pointed out how you might possibly be using a meatpuppet account because you used "we" in relation to other comments which you did not make? What I mean is, should that incident belong in the Controversy section about you? Sure, it did happen, and maybe I even got an admin to say "well, that sounds like a violation" with the false pretense that you were actually using a meatpuppet. Should that go in the article about you as controversy even if it was looked into and no administrative action was taken? In my opinion, no, because I was wrong to make the accusation in the first place (the accusation was erroneous), and all subsequent 3rd party comments surrounding my accusation were based upon a false pretense (making them erroneous as well). I think you see what I'm getting at here with regards to the Ingraham article and the requirements of WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. --Haizum   μολὼν λαβέ 09:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC) (same comment will be posted on the respective talk page, feel free to delete here and reply there)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 00:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC).


 * Hello. I would like to commence this mediation. I prefer to work over e-mail, so I'd appreciate it if you could send me an address I can use to contact you. Thanks :) &mdash;Xyrael / 13:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The other party in this dispute would like to continue it as they feel there are some civility issues to be discussed. Would you consider going further? &mdash;Xyrael / 18:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah sure. logitechpresident@gmail.com Jimmycracker 00:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 12:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

File permission problem with File:Purple open.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Purple open.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)