User talk:Jimpu

Korean War
The generals you are eager to post on Korean War page had limited commands over the forces. We are posting who were in charge of entire force, not limited to ROKA (Chung Il-kwon) or a corp (Paik Sun-yup). Please limit the commanders in supreme-level other wise, you will have to post more than 20 generals. Popularity and recognition are not the standard when we are talking about encyclopedia. Kadrun (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I just happened to look up English Wikipedia. There has been many cases where there has been edition. By chance I found an error about the user Kadrun. --Jimpu (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Korean War page was mess and filled out with false information prior to major edition with sources directly from the government of Republic of Korea. It seems like you are Korean, so I will try to inform you in Korean. 신성모, 이기붕, 신태영, 손원일은 6.25 전쟁 당시 육해공군을 총괄하던 국방장관입니다. 정일권은 당시 육군참모총장을 지냈으며, 전쟁 중 미국으로 파견된 후 돌아왔을 때 백선엽 장군보다 서열에서 밀린 상태였습니다. 백선엽 장군의 경우 여러 전투를 이끈 주요 장군이 맞으며 1953년 1월 한국군 최초 4성장군이 되었지만, Korean War 페이지의 개념상 전투가 아닌 전쟁의 레벨에서의 리더들을 나열하기 때문에 국방장관의 아래 또는 아에 없어야 되는 것이 마땅합니다. 그 사람의 업적이 대단하거나 다른 사람에 비해 유명하다고 해서 위에 나열하거나 하는 것은 군대에 있어서의 위계질서에 위반되는 것과 동일하기 때문입니다. 그리고 놀랍군요. 제가 에딧한 대부분의 내용은 국방부의 공식 자료 또는 관련 기업 업체의 공식 자료에서 발출한 것이 대부분인데, 이 것이 틀렸다면 어떻게 틀렸는지 알려 주시면 감사하겠습니다.Kadrun (talk) 03:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I added additional information for commanders, listing them propriately in order of command, hope you satisfy with it. Kadrun (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

My wish, is that I wish we could make a better wikipedia for all. And to English Wikipedia my edit will be better than your edit that are nice. --Jimpu (talk) 05:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You are taking everything personal, and it is not allowed in Wikipedia. If you want to edit or argue over the fact, you better bring the sources that are good enough. I have provided some information to you, some you simply ignore because you think you are better. Please provide information so I can understand why some commanders should be at the top rather than other commanders. If you think you can do much better, why don't you remove every single information in the box since I am the one who posted it. And one more word, are you history expert by any chance? Kadrun (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

If the information of wikipedia is not by specialists but by the non specialists, then I think that there is a problem. And because the majority of people on wikipedia are amateurs, there could be good points, however it would be a good idea where the specialists could get together. I think that English wikipedia, could have a reasearch strategy, and people would have to use the encyclopedia dictionary. So I edit the information about Korean War in English wikipedia. --Jimpu (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You are misunderstand what is encyclopedia. An encyclopedia, according to Webster's Dictionary, "is a work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or treats comprehensively a particular branch of knowledge usually in articles arranged alphabetically often by subject." Therefore, an eyclopedia must be exact and nearly 100% accurate on every single information, and the information must contain every information as possible. If you want to create simpler or summary version of an article, you should try simple English version of Wikipedia http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. Besides, you never gave an explanation or a reason to support your editing. If you failed to do so, and constantly undo other editor's work without a good reason, that could lead to a vandalism of knowledge in some cases. Let's go back to an original argument. Why do you list Chung Il-kwon and Paik Sun-yup on the commander and leader section, and why are they listed prior compared to Minister of Defense? Kadrun (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)