User talk:Jimroger

Steve Reich photo
First, you've changed the permission on the original file. It was CC licensed. What evidence do you have that it is copyright protected? Second, your revert on the Steve Reich article is based on your own changes to the photo file. Rather than starting an edit war, discuss it on the talk page and provide the evidence of copyright infringement.  freshacconci  talk talk  13:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, the file hasn't been marked for deletion. You first claimed the other photo was copyrighted. I pointed out it had a CC license. You then remove the CC license and claim in the edit summary that the file is marked for deletion. This sort of deceptive editing and deliberately incorrect edit summaries is really bad form.  freshacconci  talk talk  13:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

This was my first edit and my apologies if the rollback did not follow proper form. I am the photographer and copyright holder. The image was posted and listed with a CC license without permission (although the other photo was already available), was cropped without any indication to that effect and did not have full credit. I searched for a couple of hours through the various instruction pages to find out how to request its deletion. I marked the Commons file for deletion yesterday, nothing happened, and it seemed that making the edit directly on the Wikipedia page could be more effective, at least until the file is deleted from the Commons. The edit summaries were correct. The proof of copyright includes, among other things, LOC registration, although they have not posted it online yet. Any advice on how to proceed would be received with gratitude.Jimroger (talk) 13:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)