User talk:Jimsally

Hello, Jimsally, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 23:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

A goat for you!
Good luck with your writing!

JunheeD (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 

some remarks concerning your sandbox
Hai Jimsally,

sorry, I can't remember your real name. You've done a good job until now. As Wikipedia depends fully on voluntary contributions as far as the content is concerned (there are no paid editors), your help is welcome.

It is a bit of a pity that you only describe the first volume of the work. I think it would be a great enhancement if you could first at least shortly describe the whole work.

Is it perhaps a good idea to use the Template:infobox book at the beginning of the article, which creates the infobox on the right, like in An Authentic Account of an Embassy from the King of Great Britain to the Emperor of China.

Concerning the bibliographic information:

Perhaps you can start this section by using the template:cite book, like this:
 * (525 + 504 pages)

Two years later a second edition was published: etc.

online version of ed. 1869: vol. 2: https://archive.org/details/enorientimpress00adlegoog

and insert the text from "publication history" here.

The paragraph "Reception" in this form is not a real contribution to Wikipedia. There are no sources for your statements, so to my opinion this text cannot be maintained in this form. Perhaps you can change the order of your argument: a. there are no texts, containing a critical reception etc. (can you proof that? It's always difficult to proof that there is no critique) b. the book was not censored (how could you proof that?) And next: On the latter ground it may be assumed etc. Is there anything known about the second edition? Was it a reprint? Are there any differences betwee the second and first ed? If not this could be a proof of the popularity of the book in those days.

Good luck with it. --Dick Bos (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve En Orient: impressions et réminiscences
Hello, Jimsally,

Thanks for creating En Orient: impressions et réminiscences! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)