User talk:Jimwilson

Tom,

I wasn't promoting Flight77.info or the webmaster's thoughts with my edits. I was referencing the documentation from the Department of Justice that explains why the videos were being released and also the court order that promted the DOJ to act. Judicial Watch simply had a piggyback lawsuit on Flight77.info's case. The DOJ would have released the videos to anyone with a lawsuit - but it was Flight77.info's lawsuit that was senior and had been active for over a year before Judicial Watch even filed theirs. Judicial Watch was hand delivered the videos and thus could release them sooner. So they took all the credit, however couldn't explain why they were getting only the video of the impact.

It has been this inaccuracy of reporting that has fueld more conspiracy theories about why the videos were released and when.

My edit is just trying to clear up the record and I had to link to Flight77.info to support the statements.

Jim Wilson

I've copied your remarks to Talk:American Airlines Flight 77, and will reply there. Tom Harrison Talk 18:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding MedCab case: Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-09 source documents
You have received this message due to your name being attached to the above case brought by User:Jimwilson.

We regret to inform you that this case regards a policy change and not an inter-editor dispute. MedCab has no authority over Wikipedia policy, and we suggest that changes to policy be made at Village pump.

Thank you. ~Kylu ( u | t )  00:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)