User talk:Jimyen2014

Shape effect
Please read Scientific Research Publishing. That's not a proper academic journal, and until it is actually discussed in peer reviewed sources we can't use it. Dougweller (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I already checked the Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications and i found that the editorial board are popular in the field of electromagnetism. In addition i replicated the electromagnetic simulation by myself and i got similar results. Any experienced user or student can simply replicate the electromagnetic simulation. Although, the volume of the water are the same, there are variations in the Specific absorption rate SAR values absorbed by water in the containers and these values are in the range of SAR values reported in Bioinitiative Report.


 * This is a misunderstanding of how we determine reliable sources - they must be "reliably published", and SRP journals aren't. In addition, you need to read WP:NOTABILITY - basically, until this concept is discussed in other reliable sources, it shouldn't have its own article. Dougweller (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I do not agree with you, because the journal is indexed in many world class indexing services. Please check the indexing of the journal and the editorial board members from here Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications.


 * Then go to WP:RSN where you can argue your case. But also note WP:UNDUE - this is not significant until it gets picked up and discussed by clearly reliable sources. We are the encyclopaedia anyone can edit, but we do have policies and guidelines governing content. And, as you've seen, there's a fairly steep learning curve particularly in some areas. Dougweller (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shape effect


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shape effect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shape effects


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shape effects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Shape Effects Phenomenon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shape Effects Phenomenon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shape Effects Phenomenon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 14:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shape Effect


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shape Effect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 14:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shape Effects


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shape Effects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Your recent editing history at Pyramid power shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''I asked you to go to WP:RSN. You are apparently new, and I don't want to see you blocked, but that is likely if you continue to edit war against our guidelines and policies. It won't be me who blocks you, by the way.'' Dougweller (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)