User talk:Jin law editor

Hello, Jin law editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Advice
Hi Jin. I saw your edit to Royal College Curepipe and decided to undo it because a list of best schools is a subjective judgement unless you are getting the list from a reliable source. It is important that material in Wikipedia is referenced to reliable sources, so that everything can be verified. If your list of best schools is a published list from a reliable source then you can put it back into the article. You should also add a reference so that it is clear where the list came from. It is also best to distance yourself from making value judgements, so instead of saying "X is the best Y" it is better to say "X has been ranked as the best Y by Z" where Z is a reliable source. I also had a look at your big edit to John Kennedy College. I removed a couple of parts that were not appropriate to Wikipedia but left the rest of it. There are some serious problems with that article (from before you started editing it) which I have tagged. Maybe you can help sort these out: Anyway, please don't be put off because some of your changes got undone. This isn't a bad start for somebody new to editing Wikipedia. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs references. Add references inside "ref" tags and they will automatically appear in the References section.
 * We need to remove peacock terms like "prestigious" except where they are directly supported by references. We need to keep to a neutral tone and let the facts speak for themselves.
 * We need to avoid using terms that people won't understand. I am thinking of things like "CPE system", which are not explained in the article. The best thing to do is to link to other Wikipedia articles which explain these things.