User talk:Jionpedia/Archive 7

Kahaani award list
Please go ahead and make the separate list article. I will then summarise in prose form in Kahaani.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Excellent! Thank you. I shall start a summary prose in the main article soon.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Whenever you have time, can you please include the national film awards in this list?--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Request
Hey pleasant1623! I was wondering, would you be willing to copy-edit the Imran Khan article. It recently passed GA but a veteran editor is concerned about the number of 'direct quotes' in the article. Some of them need to paraphrased. I would've done it myself, but I'm not good at it.  Gleek Vampire   &#124;  talk!  05:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

What?
I removed tour comments as I don't want to stretch the review. Also, Barfi received far better reviews than English vinglish and equally as kahaani. Well I have added that review. Don't worry but I think your way was not good to tell me what I did. I mentioned the summary on contradiction. You should know, when I posted that the film got wide critical acclaim then, you said mixed? This is contradictory and confusing. The article is in very bad position. I improved the sources, lead and casting, reception and release-soundtrack section. But, it is weak in filming and development. You should have have worked on the article, rather than telling me to do my jod nicely. Your userpage says that you want to take it to GA, but you haven't even tried to improve it. Please, let me do my work. It would be best for the article. Thank You. Prashant   talk   17:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Well done! One thing though, the number of reviews and quotes for the reception is a little excessive. Can you convert a few of them into prose?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  13:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oblivion (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Re:Barfi
Hey congrats,How have you been.I am busy these days and do not able to spend much time.Just trying to improve Ek tha Tiger now. ---zeeyanwiki discutez 15:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, Pleasant. Well, that was my work to take Barfi! to GA. Also, I'm working on reception to change the quotes into prose.  Prashant   talk   15:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Did I objected to your contributions? I wrote that as you said you'll never forget what I did by taking it to GA. I answered that. You should add that in your contribution also I appreciate your work on it. Prashant   talk   15:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hearty congratulations Pleasant! So, what's next on your article improvement list? Are you planning to take Barfi! to FA? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, so all praises are poured over you! Well, I don't want any appreciation from anyone. But, please respect my work and contribution to the article. You should include my name, whenever you get congratulatory messages. But, I guess you don't want to even mention. Prashant    talk   18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Barfi!
I'm so glad that Barfi! page has got a good article tag now. Glad because I helped expanding the casting, filming and development sections as you had requested me. Do involve me more next time for Bollywood film related articles. Arjann (talk) 11:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * These are efforts of one and all not only me and Prashant. :) Arjann (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It seems that you guys are here only to take credit for the article. But, pls stop all this. The good news is that the article is a GA now. Also, don't even think to take it to FA as of now. As, it needs, 10 times the work done on it.  Prashant   talk   16:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

FAC
Could you take a look at the FAC of Ra.One? Your input would be much appreciated. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 10:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey! How are you doing? Thanks for the cheeseburger but It seems that i don't deserve all these appreciation for my hard work that I put on the stub article development. As, some editors are involved here to pull me down. They have reassed two of my GAs. I want to ask. If anyone is very much worried on the Content on wiki, then they should himself work on article or review them. I think they are here only to waste someone's time.  Prashant   talk   18:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:White House Down.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:White House Down.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Epic poster
That is not the final poster for Epic, show me a source that says that is the final poster. Cause i have a source saying the other one is the final poster right here it says "Final One Sheet". Koala15 (talk) 19:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

That is not the final poster. How many times do i need to tell you, you just keep reverting back. Koala15 (talk) 18:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Final posters do not always have ratings, and if you keep reverting that is considered edit warring. Bottom line is that is not the final poster, and can you please stop changing it? Koala15 (talk) 14:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

General query
Hey. Hi. Hope you are fine. :) I want to ask you in positive manner that why did you remove template of album ratings from Jab Tak Hai Jaan (soundtrack) and Barfi!'s soundtrack section? Is there any rule or something that governs this? Or like can you help/tell me where is it necessary to put the template and where we mustn't? Arjann (talk) 09:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Hi jion,emm gud,Thanx.What about you?I am damn busy these days with no proper internet access. ---zeeyanwiki discutez 09:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah interested,I will be fully available from mid of june.Till then it is difficult to be here. ---zeeyanwiki discutez 09:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Jab Tak Hai Jaan
Ya..hi! Sorry, I'm not interested in JTHJ. As, the film and the article don't excite me. The film itself is one the worst films of 2012. A complete letdown and the only likeable thing was the music. Also, I don't have much time to work here. In addition, the article is in critical condition, needs more work, needs thorough copy edit, removal of fluffy information. The article is very boring as no one is interested to read only reception and box office (as the article covers only these two section ). All the best for GA. Prashant!   talk   15:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at File:Big Fish poster.jpg. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Please do not edit-war. Film Fan (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * @Film Fan:Stop providing unneccessary warning to users.Make yourself thorough with the policies first.Your revert and summaries are bogus,You want your edits done at whatever cost.I just made some appropriate change there,Do not revert it otherwise i have no option other than reporting you. ---zeeyanwiki discutez 18:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok but try to make resolution less than 10000 while multiplying dimension.It's a guideline not my views.Thanx ---zeeyanwiki  discutez 19:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 10000 pixels is a very rough guide. A little over is not a problem. It is not a strict rule. Film Fan (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)