User talk:Jionpedia/Archive 9

TFA for Kahaani
Hi! Sholay has been proposed for TFA on 15 August. I think we should wait more for Kahaani. May be even next year on the anniversary of Indian cinema.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Userboxes
Userboxes, eeks, can't stand the bloody things, sorry! "This user drinks coca-cola". Who could give a monkey's left testicle LOL...♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  08:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry if I didn't understand the first one, but the second one is cool. You can just message that if you want to talk to someone :D -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I like The Shining (film) idea (the first one) but dislike userboxes!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  10:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I like The Shining userbox too. It's really cool. :) -- smaro jit  HD 02:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The Kahaani one is nice too. Good job. :) -- smaro jit  HD 11:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Semi protection for Chennai Express
SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA 12:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Please make a request to semi-protect the Chennai Express.Intense flurry of IP vandalism due to recent current events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA (talk • contribs)

SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA 04:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Thanks for semi-protect the article Chennai Express. Please tell me the procedure to semi-protect an article as i am a new-bie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the barnstar!
Thanks! Pleasant for the barnstar. Also, ill start my work soon on Barfi! for FA after Chopra filmography. I will nominate Barfi! only when you will be back after your exam. Thanks for being a calm and cool-headed co-editor.— Prashant 17:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Reverting the edit
I found you reverting my edit of adding a Wikiproject India|cinema banner in the Talk:Student of the Year. May I know why?R!j!n (talk) 13:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh hello, whos this
Why you changing my reviews and words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyzhamat (talk • contribs) 07:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Whats your problem
Why you deleting my links, wikipedia is not your property and i am not doing anything wrong, like others doing i am doing the same. My links are genuine and related to articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyzhamat (talk • contribs) 07:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hi Pleasant. I know you're just helping with reverting the addition of spamlinks by Jonnyzhamat, but it is still edit warring. I want to give you a head's up to disengage before any passing admin strolls by and decides to block you over it. If he keeps going, simply take him to WP:ANEW.  Ish dar  ian  07:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, Ishdarian's comments are incorrect. Adding WP:SPAM to articles is a form of vandalism, as stated in WP:Vandalism. Reverting spam is never edit warring, and should be done as many times as necessary to stop the editor. You can even report a persistent spammer to WP:AIV, which is much faster and easier than WP:ANEW. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * My apologies, and thank you for the correction, Qwyrxian. Keep up the good work, Pleasant!  Ish dar  ian  11:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

A note about your postings to the Guild of Copy Editors' Requests page
Hi there! Thanks for posting copy edit requests to the Guild of Copy Editors' Requests page. In the fine print at the top of the page, we ask that individuals limit their requests to no more than three articles on the page at any time, so that everyone can have a chance to make requests. Can you please remove two of your five requests? When any of your three articles have been copy edited, you are welcome to post additional articles. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Chennai Express collections
People are complaining about collections again, as happens when any SRK film releases, do I've added the same clause that was reached upon in a consensus. Basically reporting the Taran collections and whatnot just like the JTHJ page. Hopefully people will stop complaining now.

While Box Office India stated that the film netted inr 292500000, trade analyst Taran Adarsh and the producers, UTV, claimed it reached a 13-percent higher figure, about inr 331200000, during its opening day thus making it the highest opening day of all time. There was debate over the various sources but several news organizations like ABP News, The Times of India and The Business Standard verified the claim of the producers.

This ok? Ashermadan (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, take a look at my talk page. Some guy keeps on asking me to add stuff. Ashermadan (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Chennai Express Collections
Yeah, we added the same little clause to the Jab Tak Hai Jaan talk page and people were happy. So I think this will work. Plus, we already have user and admin consensus over adding clauses like this so it's not an issue. Glad we figured this out! Ashermadan (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Shoot Me Now
We need better protection over the page. Even more restrictive editing. Do something! I might kill myself. I don't think I can handle more trolls. Ashermadan (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Another troll. Now there's some guy named Filodster going against out clause decision. Please talk to him and tell him to stop this. He's a notorious Salman fans who regularly trolls pages. Ashermadan (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Why so hurry?
Hey Pleasant! I think the article needs a considerable work. I will add more information to Production, introduce a themes and influences for Barfi! It has much more informatrion on the Bonus DVD. So, please Db author that archieve page as the article needs expansion. Then, a thorough copy-edit and then followed by its PR. I think it would be ready by the end of this year and will be nominated after that. That much information for a film article is very small. I was collecting several sources also and i got a large number of sources. So, it would be easy to expand. The articles needs to be very solid, if you want to pass it in first attempt, which is currently not. Thanks!— Prashant 18:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Try to understand bud, it's not a right time as you can't expand and review at same time. Also, it will take sometime to expand it. It should be widely covered, but the article is still not ready. I don't know what is the problem? You should have deleted it as it needs a copy-edit first after expansion. Hope you'll understand. You and me both want to pass FA at first attempt. Right? But, it needs 5 times more work.— Prashant 11:08, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Bud!!— Prashant 13:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Reviewing
Have you ever reviewed a GA article Pleasant? I'd be happy to review your articles and vice versa.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  10:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Sure, let me know when you think it's ready for GA and I'll review it. Perhaps you could review Lilian Faithfull for me? It's about as comprehensive as it can be, not much to go on with her, but it's short and sweet.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  11:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you so much, Pleasant. :) -- smaro jit  HD 11:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)