User talk:Jirgen666

WP:AIV is not a means of content disupte resolution
Hi ,

Thank you very much for your report at WP:AIV. However, the vandalism noticeboard is not intended for this purpose, since the reported edits have not been done in bad faith, and are thus not "vandalism".

Please have a look at WP:Dispute resolution, a detailed explanation for dealing with disputes on Wikipedia. Please note that one of the recommended options is disengaging from the dispute. In my personal opinion, this is always the best option.

Thank you very much in advance and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30002
-- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 07:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 07:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * My edits have already been vindicated by more qualified administrators who are more knowledgeable and professional at the academic topic at hand. No need to un-ban me, my work is done here.
 * If that was really the case and you weren't just stroking your ego, there wouldn't have been a need for you to post.
 * At this point, this talk page is for you to try to understand your block, appeal your block, and nothing further. If your next post is anything but understanding or appealing your block (not arguing it but admitting to the behavior and showing how you'll avoid it in the future), your talk page access will be revoked.  We don't have time for your petty attempts at mind games.  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)