User talk:Jitenasukhrani

Hi!
You're the social media person at Dan Murphy's now, I guess? (I noticed you referred to the company as 'we' and 'our'.)

So, in regards to your edit: this is mostly okay. You didn't properly integrate the source URL into the article code, but you did at least include it in the edit summary. I can fix that.

We would appreciate it if you were to make full disclosure of your conflict of interest. Because editing the article about your employer is a conflict of interest, even if all you're doing is updating who's the managing director.

It would also be preferred if, rather than making these edits yourself, you were to post your suggestions for edits on the article's talk page.

Thank you, and I hope you find other things that interest you as well. DS (talk) 00:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi DragonFly,
 * Thanks for sharing the information about the process that needs to be taken care of. I'll ensure that this is being following moving forward.
 * Also, we're looking to change the brand logo as it's the old one but can't find any option for that. Is this something that you'll be assisting with?
 * Thanks! Jitenasukhrani (talk) 07:56, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Give me a URL for where I can find the new logo and I'll take care of it.
 * We'll probably retain the old logo in the article for historical purposes - "Dan Murphy logo until 2022" or something - I don't suppose you'd know when that logo was first used? If not, okay, but it'd be useful information. DS (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi DragonFly,
 * Thank you so much for your quick response. Please find the link of the logo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AG0FNU2I_5sbxhkuY4iyD_Xpo_9IP_kZ/view?usp=sharing
 * You should be able to access the same as it's open for everyone.
 * Regards, Jitenasukhrani (talk) 12:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Is that the logo that is now in use, or that will be in use? If the latter, we can't use it yet. DS (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi DragonFly,
 * The shared logo is already in use on our website & everywhere in other marketing channels. So that's the latest one that we need to update in Wikipedia too. Thanks! Jitenasukhrani (talk) 12:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello Jitenasukhrani. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Dan Murphy's, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jitenasukhrani. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)