User talk:Jitumoni1995

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jitumoni1995. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 17:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Pooja Hegde
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KhaasBanda (talk • contribs) 06:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Pooja Hegde. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 16:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Michael Ferreira
Please do not add defamatory content that violates our policy on biographies of living people. This is not acceptable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Michael Ferreira
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did  at Michael Ferreira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labe ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Qnet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Qnet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Qnet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Qnet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on QNet; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Some of your edits may be acceptable. Some of them are clearly unacceptable per Wikipedia policy. It's not practical to tease them out, so I've reverted your edits wholesale.
 * What I suggest is that you request edits, one at a time, on the article's talk page. Be specific about what you want to change and what source backs up the claims. If other editors agree, we can assist you with changing the article, but you should not change the article until you get that consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * And for reference, this is a prime example of text that should not be written in Wikipedia's voice. —C.Fred (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)