User talk:Jjaldridge 2009

Unspecified source for Image:Bud-light-otter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bud-light-otter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- M s c h e l 13:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of If I were Reincarnated as an Otter
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on If I were Reincarnated as an Otter, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because If I were Reincarnated as an Otter provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting If I were Reincarnated as an Otter, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate If I were Reincarnated as an Otter itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please don't vandalise my user page again. Canley 15:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as If I were Reincarnated as an Otter, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wildthing61476 17:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to If I were Reincarnated as an Otter, you will be blocked from editing. Wildthing61476 18:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, do not vandalize my User page. Wildthing61476 18:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It's not rocket science
from the speedy delete tag - " but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." kthnxbai--Speed Air Man 18:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for the following reason; Please see our blocking policy for more information. —  Xy 7  18:19, 29 May 2007
 * persistent vandalism.

Image copyright problem with Image:Bud-light-otter.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Bud-light-otter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Maxwell Peterson
A tag has been placed on Maxwell Peterson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)