User talk:Jjavitt

Welcome!
Hello, Jjavitt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Attachment Order.jpeg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Attachment Order.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Attachment Order.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Attachment order.jpeg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Attachment order.jpeg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your post at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests
I have reverted your post at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests, as it is in clear and unambiguous violation of the Biographies of living persons policy. You must not under any circumstances make accusations of illegal conduct by named individuals, anywhere on Wikipedia. Doing so is liable to result in you're being blocked from editing. If you have verifiable evidence of a specific Wikipedia user account being used in ways contrary to our policies, I suggest that you raise the matter at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - but be aware that you need to provide evidence, that you must not make claims of illegal conduct, and that your own behaviour may also come under scrutiny. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm a little confused here. The lawsuits against this person are in the public record. He is being sued in public by multiple de-frauded investors and also being sued by his own lawyers. That is not an accusation. It's merely a statement of facts that can be verified from official sources. When court documents are posted to his wikipedia biography, his paid biographer removes them.

Jjavitt (talk) 06:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * It may possibly be a statement of fact that he is being sued. Unless and until it is proven in a court of law, assertions that anyone has been 'de-frauded' by anyone else don't belong on Wikipedia. Just how difficult is that to understand? AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * And as for what this supposed 'paid biographer' removed, if I'd seen it, I would have done exactly the same thing myself - again per our biographies of living persons policy. We don't cite court documents, for multiple reasons, and instead cite secondary sources - media reports etc. And your post wasn't a simple recap of court documents (which weren't properly cited anyway) - it was clearly and unambiguously written in a manner to put the subject of the biography in a bad light. To put it bluntly, if you have a beef with Abramowitz, it is no concern of ours. If reliable sources report on a relevant court case, it may possibly merit inclusion in the article, but under our terms - which require neutrality, not skewed reporting. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)