User talk:Jjfarren

Visupedia
A template has been added to the article Visupedia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. kateshortforbob 11:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Visupedia
Visupedia, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Visupedia satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Visupedia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Visupedia during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spryde 12:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Listen
I've deleted your article on Visupedia because it doesn't yet meet our criteria for notability. Perhaps it will someday soon... but not yet.

We have to be strict about this because otherwise, people try using Wikipedia as a promotional tool. As spam.

That's not what Wikipedia is for. DS 12:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)