User talk:Jjjimg

Your submission at Articles for creation
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mrmatiko (talk) 13:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Godfrey Poku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mrmatiko (talk) 08:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Nomination of Godfrey Poku for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godfrey Poku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Godfrey Poku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk  10:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Robbie Willmott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; The Earwig   (talk)  19:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Godfrey Poku


The article Godfrey Poku has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 10:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Robbie Willmott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robbie Willmott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robbie Willmott (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Ushau97. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ushau97 talk  contribs 12:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2015–16 UEFA Champions League, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237&#160;(talk) 20:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, biography of living persons
Sideswipe9th (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Question
It looks like you are mostly interested in British footballers. After being away from Wikipedia for 4 years, you come back to argue about putting the name of an alleged mass murderer on the page for the town where he lived. Why? Help me understand why this is important to you. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I know, having an interest in British footballers must make me a monster in your eyes. I understand now. I used to think Wikipedia was about facts, that's all. Incidentally I'm British. Jjjimg (talk) 17:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't care if you like football or not. It's just what you used to edit. I'm just trying understand what your interest is in this one page about a small town in a different country from yours. If read WP:BLP you will understand why that person can't be added to that page. So that's not happening, but I want to know why you think it's important. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh right, likes football, must be a racist. That offends me. Stop sending me messages. Jjjimg (talk) 17:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I think what PA is saying is that since you're heavily invested in editing that page, which is kinda different from your usual interests. Regarding "I'm just trying understand what your interest is in this one page about a small town in a different country from yours", he's already explained that "I want to know why you think it's important." I don't think there's any attacking here, so perhaps we shouldn't assume intent so quickly. Cheers. Firestar464 (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)