User talk:Jjjulie6

Welcome!


Hello, Jjjulie6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC).

Richard K. Diran
... You wrote: this is from the San Francisco Chronicle: http://docs.newsbank.com/s/InfoWeb/aggdocs/NewsBank/0EB4F3DC01D20891/C4A791F4197B4BD28C27A2A6A0C93929?p_multi=SFCB&s_lang=en-US.Jjjulie6 (talk) 23:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The small part that was deleted under the heading "Antiquities repatriation" was unrelated and non-notable. One newspaper article does not make a person or incident notable - quite the opposite. Under page edit history was left the following valid reason: "Deleted libelous data which is non-notable, nor related to subject's notability, nor related to the section heading, and which is also not notable enough to merit a heading of its own."Rickbrown9 (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at National Museum of Myanmar. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring a final warning about inserting inappropriate material about a living person in unrelated articles, blatant POV pushing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The last two edits you made as Special:Contributions/206.209.102.122 can be found here and here, just in case you thought no one would notice you were editing while logged out. You are a single-purpose account with an agenda against this person (whose bio already contains the information in question written in a neutral way) and clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)