User talk:Jjman1987

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Delayed onset muscle soreness shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Lead
Please read the edit summaries in the editing "History" before making new edits. You risk getting blocked if you continue. You have been reverted, and, per the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle, you should now "Discuss", not restore your content. Any restoration is de facto evidence of edit warring. There is only one R in BRD.

The major problem right now, besides edit warring, is that you are not following our formatting rules. Read WP:LEAD. You can't just dump a whole lot of content into the lead (the part before the Table of Contents). The content in the body of the article must be developed first (as has been done), and then the lead must sum it up very succinctly. Since the article is well-developed by many other editors, you should only make small edits and tweaks. Large edits may show disrespect for the work of others. We edit collaboratively here, and you may well have something good to add, but do it together with other editors who are watching the article. Start with suggestions on the talk page and we'll see if we can help you achieve your goals. Let's work together. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)