User talk:Jjocisme

Image:Katie Cassidy -77.png
You recently uploaded Image:Katie Cassidy -77.png and tagged it as being licensed under the GFDL, but the source website does not state this. Are you the creator of this image? --- RockMFR 01:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Katie Cassidy -77.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Katie Cassidy -77.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --- RockMFR 23:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sasha Vujacic in Beverly Hills.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sasha Vujacic in Beverly Hills.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW ( Talk ) 14:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Sasha Vujacic in Beverly Hills.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sasha Vujacic in Beverly Hills.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW ( Talk ) 14:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)