User talk:Jjx04

August 2016
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sing for Absolution, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Black Holes and Revelations, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Absolution (album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Planet Telex.  Rob van  vee  08:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It would appear you are hell bent on getting blocked again. Keep it up, your behavior will make this wish come true.  Rob  van  vee  08:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Pyramid Song. Binksternet (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Knights of Cydonia.  Rob van  vee  05:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

OK Computer genre
Hi,

Please, before making any other changes to the genre of OK Computer, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:OK_Computer#Addressing_various_changes_to_the_lead:_genre.2C_release_date.2C_etc. read this post] at the talk page.

tl;dr: Dozens of human beings have devoted hundreds of volunteer hours over years, in common purpose and cooperation, to think through issues like the album's genre, to pore over the existing source material and to think critically about the Wikipedia community's standards, to give shape to this article the way it is today. I would ask that you not trod over parts of the page as it exists just because you think the consensus achieved is wrong, and to engage with other editors and think about what the reasons might be that other users have decided to exclude genres you have listed. —BLZ · talk 18:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 123.136.112.219 (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)